Flow interruption effects on intake rate and rill erosion in two soils

Efficiency of surface irrigation is often low because of poor infiltration uniformity, resulting from relatively long periods of infiltration at the upstream end and short periods of infiltration infiltration at the downstream end of the held, Surge irrigation, the intermittent supply of water to furrows, generally reduces soil intake rate (IR) and improves moisture uniformity over the entire held, However, IR reduction varies from one irrigation scheme to another, depends on soil and water properties, and is difficult to predict. A laboratory study using miniflumes was designed to investigate the effect of interrupted flow on In and soil loss from short rills, Two soils differing in their textures, a silt loam (Calcic Haploxeralf) derived from loess and a clay soil (Typic Haploxerert), were studied. Intake rate in the clay soil was greater than that in the silt loam. Therefore, different inflow rates were applied to the two soils to achieve similar runoff now rates from the two soils. Cumulative infiltration decreased from 646 mt in continuous flow to 539 mt in interrupted now for the silt loam and from 1142 to 1068 mt, in the clay soil. Interrupted now also reduced cumulative soil loss by 84% in the clay soil but had only a small effect on soil loss From the silt loam. However, when now rate was increased from 80 to 320 mt min(-1), interrupted now reduced soil loss in the silt loam as much as in the clay soil. Consolidation of the soil surface and formation of cohesive forces between soil particles of the silt loam with unstable structure during now interruption was suggested as the explanation for the effect of flow interruption on intake rate and soil detachment. These results need to be verified in field experiments.