Performance of Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm for first trimester preeclampsia screening in an indigenous south Asian population

被引:10
|
作者
Prasad, Smriti [1 ]
Sahota, Daljit Singh [2 ]
Vanamail, P. [3 ]
Sharma, Akshatha
Arora, Saloni
Kaul, Anita [4 ]
机构
[1] Indraprastha Apollo Hosp, New Delhi, India
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Prince Wales Hosp, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, New Delhi, India
[4] Indraprastha Apollo Hosp, Apollo Ctr Fetal Med, New Delhi, India
关键词
Pre-eclampsia; South Asian; Screening; 1st trimester; Uterine artery Pulsatility index; Mean arterial pressure; Placental growth factor; Pregnancy associated plasma protein-a; HIGH-RISK; PREGNANCIES; PRESSURE; ASPIRIN;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-021-04283-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background To evaluate the performance of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) preterm preeclampsia (PE) screening algorithm in an indigenous South Asian population. Methods This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted in a tertiary maternal fetal unit in Delhi, India over 2 years. The study population comprised of 1863 women carrying a singleton pregnancy and of South Asian ethnicity who were screened for preterm pre-eclampsia (PE) between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation using Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), transvaginal Mean Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index (UtAPI) and biochemical markers - Pregnancy Associated Plasma Protein-A (PAPP-A) and Placental Growth Factor.. Absolutemeasurements of noted biomarkers were converted to multiples of the expected gestational median (MoMS) which were then used to estimate risk for preterm PE < 37 weeks using Astraia software. Women with preterm PE risk of >= 1:100 was classified as as high risk. Detection rates (DR) at 10% false positive rate were calculated after adjusting for prophylactic aspirin use (either 75 or 150 mg). Results The incidence of PE and preterm PE were 3.17% (59/1863) and 1.34% (25/1863) respectively. PAPP-A and PlGF MoM distribution medians were 0.86 and 0.87 MoM and significantly deviated from 1 MoM. 431 (23.1%) women had a risk of >= 1:100, 75 (17.8%) of who received aspirin. Unadjusted DR using >= 1:100 threshold was 76%.Estimated DRs for a fixed 10% FPR ranged from 52.5 to 80% depending on biomarker combination after recentering MoMs and adjusting for aspirin use. Conclusion The FMF algorithm whilst performing satisfactorily could still be further improved to ensure that biophysical and biochemical markers are correctly adjusted for indigenous South Asian women.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The need for implementation of first trimester screening for preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction in low resource settings
    Lakshmy, Selvaraj
    Ziyaulla, Thasleem
    Rose, Nity
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (24): : 4082 - 4089
  • [22] Comparison of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction screenings at first trimester in a high-risk population
    Romero Infante, Ximena Carolina
    Uriel, Montserrat
    Porras Ramirez, Alexandra
    Rincon Franco, Sara
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 47 (02) : 765 - 773
  • [23] Evaluation of screening performance of first trimester competing risk prediction model for small for gestational age in Asian population
    Nguyen-Hoang, L.
    Papastefanou, I.
    Sahota, D. S.
    Wah, Y.
    Pooh, R. K.
    Zheng, M.
    Ma, R.
    Chaiyasit, N.
    Tokunaka, M.
    Shaw, S.
    Seshadri, S.
    Choolani, M.
    Panchalee, T.
    Yapan, P.
    Sim, W.
    Sekizawa, A.
    Saito, S.
    Poon, L. C.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 : 82 - 82
  • [24] Construction of prediction model for fetal growth restriction during first trimester in an Asian population
    Zheng, C.
    Ji, C.
    Wang, B.
    Zhang, J.
    He, Q.
    Ma, J.
    Yang, Z.
    Pan, Q.
    Sun, L.
    Sun, N.
    Ling, C.
    Lin, G.
    Deng, X.
    Yin, L.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 63 (03) : 321 - 330
  • [25] Screening for fetal abnormalities in the first trimester of pregnancy: What is the performance of ultrasound diagnosis?
    Prodan, Natalia Carmen
    Kagan, Karl Oliver
    Hoopmann, Markus
    GYNAKOLOGE, 2021, 54 (08): : 532 - 539
  • [26] First trimester fetal nuchal translucency: Problems with screening the general population 1 and 2
    Braithwaite, JM
    Economides, DL
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1995, 102 (12): : 1018 - 1019
  • [27] First-trimester screening for chromosomal abnormalities by fetal nuchal translucency in a Brazilian population
    Brizot, ML
    Carvalho, MHB
    Liao, AW
    Reis, NSV
    Armbruster-Moraes, E
    Zugaib, M
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 18 (06) : 652 - 655
  • [28] First-trimester screening for aneuploidy with fetal nuchal translucency in a United States population
    Chasen, ST
    Sharma, G
    Kalish, RB
    Chervenak, FA
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 22 (02) : 149 - 151
  • [29] Performance of a first-trimester screening of preeclampsia in a routine care low-risk setting
    Scazzocchio, Elena
    Figueras, Francesc
    Crispi, Fatima
    Meler, Eva
    Masoller, Narcs
    Mula, Raquel
    Gratacos, Eduard
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (03) : 203.e1 - 203.e10
  • [30] First trimester combined screening for preeclampsia and small for gestational age - a single centre experience and validation of the FMF screening algorithm
    Beatrice, Mosimann
    Chantal, Pfiffner
    Sofia, Amylidi-Mohr
    Lorenz, Risch
    Daniel, Surbek
    Luigi, Raio
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2017, 147 : w14498