Performance of Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm for first trimester preeclampsia screening in an indigenous south Asian population

被引:10
|
作者
Prasad, Smriti [1 ]
Sahota, Daljit Singh [2 ]
Vanamail, P. [3 ]
Sharma, Akshatha
Arora, Saloni
Kaul, Anita [4 ]
机构
[1] Indraprastha Apollo Hosp, New Delhi, India
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Prince Wales Hosp, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, New Delhi, India
[4] Indraprastha Apollo Hosp, Apollo Ctr Fetal Med, New Delhi, India
关键词
Pre-eclampsia; South Asian; Screening; 1st trimester; Uterine artery Pulsatility index; Mean arterial pressure; Placental growth factor; Pregnancy associated plasma protein-a; HIGH-RISK; PREGNANCIES; PRESSURE; ASPIRIN;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-021-04283-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background To evaluate the performance of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) preterm preeclampsia (PE) screening algorithm in an indigenous South Asian population. Methods This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted in a tertiary maternal fetal unit in Delhi, India over 2 years. The study population comprised of 1863 women carrying a singleton pregnancy and of South Asian ethnicity who were screened for preterm pre-eclampsia (PE) between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation using Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), transvaginal Mean Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index (UtAPI) and biochemical markers - Pregnancy Associated Plasma Protein-A (PAPP-A) and Placental Growth Factor.. Absolutemeasurements of noted biomarkers were converted to multiples of the expected gestational median (MoMS) which were then used to estimate risk for preterm PE < 37 weeks using Astraia software. Women with preterm PE risk of >= 1:100 was classified as as high risk. Detection rates (DR) at 10% false positive rate were calculated after adjusting for prophylactic aspirin use (either 75 or 150 mg). Results The incidence of PE and preterm PE were 3.17% (59/1863) and 1.34% (25/1863) respectively. PAPP-A and PlGF MoM distribution medians were 0.86 and 0.87 MoM and significantly deviated from 1 MoM. 431 (23.1%) women had a risk of >= 1:100, 75 (17.8%) of who received aspirin. Unadjusted DR using >= 1:100 threshold was 76%.Estimated DRs for a fixed 10% FPR ranged from 52.5 to 80% depending on biomarker combination after recentering MoMs and adjusting for aspirin use. Conclusion The FMF algorithm whilst performing satisfactorily could still be further improved to ensure that biophysical and biochemical markers are correctly adjusted for indigenous South Asian women.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance of Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm for first trimester preeclampsia screening in an indigenous south Asian population
    Smriti Prasad
    Daljit Singh Sahota
    P. Vanamail
    Akshatha Sharma
    Saloni Arora
    Anita Kaul
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21
  • [2] Screening and prevention of preeclampsia using the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm
    Loussert, Lola
    Dupuis, Ninon
    Hamdi, Safouane M.
    Guerby, Paul
    Vayssiere, Christophe
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2025, 53 (02): : 76 - 80
  • [3] First Trimester Screening for Preeclampsia: An Asian Perspective
    Moungmaithong Sakita
    Wang Xueqin
    Tai Angela S.T.
    Feng Qiaoli
    Sahota Daljit
    Leung Tak Yeung
    Poon Liona C.
    母胎医学杂志(英文), 2021, 03 (02) : 116 - 123
  • [4] First Trimester Screening for Preeclampsia: An Asian Perspective
    Moungmaithong, Sakita
    Wang, Xueqin
    Tai, Angela S. T.
    Feng, Qiaoli
    Sahota, Daljit
    Leung, Tak Yeung
    Poon, Liona C.
    MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE, 2021, 3 (02) : 116 - 123
  • [5] First-trimester Combined Screening Test for Aneuploidies in Brazilian Unselected Pregnancies: Diagnostic Performance of Fetal Medicine Foundation Algorithm
    Abi Abib, Laila Pinheiro
    Moreira de Sa, Renato Augusto
    Peixoto-Filho, Fernando Maia
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2018, 40 (07): : 384 - 389
  • [6] Prospective evaluation of screening performance of first-trimester prediction models for preterm preeclampsia in an Asian population
    Chaemsaithong, Piya
    Pooh, Ritsuko K.
    Zheng, Mingming
    Ma, Runmei
    Chaiyasit, Noppadol
    Tokunaka, Mayumi
    Shaw, Steven W.
    Seshadri, Suresh
    Choolani, Mahesh
    Wataganara, Tuangsit
    Yeo, George S. H.
    Wright, Alan
    Leung, Wing Cheong
    Sekizawa, Akihiko
    Hu, Yali
    Naruse, Katsuhiko
    Saito, Shigeru
    Sahota, Daljit
    Leung, Tak Yeung
    Poon, Liona C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 221 (06)
  • [7] External validation of the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm for the prediction of preeclampsia in a Brazilian population
    de Castro Rezende, Karina Bilda
    Ledo Alves da Cunha, Antnio Jose
    Amim Junior, Joffre
    Bornia, Rita Guerios
    PREGNANCY HYPERTENSION-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH, 2019, 17 : 64 - 68
  • [8] Validation of Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm for prediction of pre-eclampsia in the first trimester in an unselected Brazilian population
    Rago Lobo, Guilherme Antonio
    Nowak, Paulo Martin
    Panigassi, Ana Paula
    Felipe Lima, Angelia Iara
    Araujo Junior, Edward
    Machado Nardozza, Luciano Marcondes
    Silva Pares, David Baptista
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (02): : 286 - 292
  • [9] Performance of the FMF First-Trimester Preeclampsia-Screening Algorithm in a High-Risk Population in The Netherlands
    Zwertbroek, Eva F.
    Groen, Henk
    Fontanella, Federica
    Maggio, Luana
    Marchi, Laura
    Bilardo, Caterina M.
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2021, 48 (02) : 103 - 111
  • [10] First-Trimester Combined Multimarker Prospective Study for the Detection of Pregnancies at a High Risk of Developing Preeclampsia Using the Fetal Medicine Foundation-Algorithm
    Guizani, Meriem
    Valsamis, Joseph
    Dutemeyer, Vivien
    Kang, Xin
    Ceccoti, Vera
    Khalife, Joe
    Duiella, Silvia F.
    Blavier, Frederic
    Faraca, Alessandra
    Cos, Teresa
    Jani, Jacques C.
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2018, 43 (04) : 266 - 273