Primary cerebral lymphoma and glioblastoma multiforme: Differences in diffusion characteristics evaluated with diffusion tensor imaging

被引:159
|
作者
Toh, C. -H. [1 ]
Castillo, M. [3 ]
Wong, A. M. -C. [1 ]
Wei, K. -C. [2 ]
Wong, H. -F. [1 ]
Ng, S. -H. [1 ]
Wan, Y. -L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Imaging & Intervent, Tao Yuan 333, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Tao Yuan 333, Taiwan
[3] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A0872
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Differentiating between primary cerebral lymphoma and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) based on conventional MR imaging sequences may be impossible. Our hypothesis was that there are significant differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) between lymphoma and GBM, which will allow for differentiation between them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative diffusion tenser imaging (DTI) was performed in 10 patients with lymphoma and 10 patients with GBM. Regions of interest were placed in only solid-enhancing tumor areas and the contralateral normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) to measure the FA and ADC values. The differences in FA and ADC between lymphoma and GBM, as well as between solid-enhancing areas of each tumor type and contralateral NAWM, were analyzed statistically. Cutoff values of FA, FA ratio, ADC, and ADC ratio for distinguishing lymphomas from GBMs were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: FA and ADC values of lymphoma were significantly decreased compared with NAWM. Mean FA, FA ratio, ADC (X 10(-3) mm(2)/s), and ADC ratios were 0.140 +/- 0.024, 0.25 +/- 0.04, 0.630 +/- 0.155, and 0.83 +/- 0.14 for lymphoma, respectively, and 0.229 +/- 0.069, 0.40 +/- 0.12, 0.963 +/- 0.119, and 1.26 +/- 0.13 for GBM, respectively. All of the values were significantly different between lymphomas and GBM. Cutoff values to differentiate lymphomas from GBM were 0.192 for FA, 0.33 for FA ratio, 0.818 for ADC, and 1.06 for ADC ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The FA and ADC of primary cerebral lymphoma were significantly lower than those of GBM. DTI is able to differentiate lymphomas from GBM.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 475
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] LONGITUDINAL DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING IN THE PRIMARY PROGRESSIVE APHASIAS
    Mahoney, Colin J.
    Simpson, Ivor J. A.
    Nicholas, Jennifer M.
    Rohrer, Jonathan D.
    Warren, Jason D.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 89 (06): : E10 - E10
  • [42] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging
    Raya J.G.
    Current Radiology Reports, 2 (3)
  • [43] THREE PATTERNS OF MIRROR MOVEMENTS OF THE HAND IN HEMIPLEGIC CEREBRAL PALSY EVALUATED BY FUNCTIONAL MRI AND DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING
    Onuma, A.
    Wakusawa, K.
    Oishi, T.
    Takeo, K.
    Munakata, M.
    CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 36 : 99 - 99
  • [44] Integrative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Radiogenomic Network Analysis of Glioblastoma multiforme
    Heiland, Dieter Henrik
    Simon-Gabriel, Carl Philipp
    Demerath, Theo
    Haaker, Gerrit
    Pfeifer, Dietmar
    Kellner, Elias
    Kiselev, Valerij G.
    Staszewski, Ori
    Urbach, Horst
    Weyerbrock, Astrid
    Mader, Irina
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [45] Prediction of Glioblastoma Multiforme Response to Bevacizumab Treatment Using Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging
    Abadi, Ehsan
    Soltanian-Zadeh, Hamid
    Scarpace, Lisa
    Mikkelsen, Tom
    2015 22ND IRANIAN CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (ICBME), 2015, : 314 - 318
  • [46] Integrative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Radiogenomic Network Analysis of Glioblastoma multiforme
    Dieter Henrik Heiland
    Carl Philipp Simon-Gabriel
    Theo Demerath
    Gerrit Haaker
    Dietmar Pfeifer
    Elias Kellner
    Valerij G. Kiselev
    Ori Staszewski
    Horst Urbach
    Astrid Weyerbrock
    Irina Mader
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [47] Biocomputing: numerical simulation of glioblastoma growth using diffusion tensor imaging
    Bondiau, Pierre-Yves
    Clatz, Olivier
    Sermesant, Maxime
    Marcy, Pierre-Yves
    Delingette, Herve
    Frenay, Marc
    Ayache, Nicholas
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (04): : 879 - 893
  • [48] DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING DRIVEN GROWTH MODELING FOR TARGET DEFINITION IN GLIOBLASTOMA
    Kallehauge, Jesper Foldsted
    Guldberg, Trine Lignell
    Harboll, Anja
    Jensen, Morten Bjorn
    Lukacova, Slavka
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 19 : 221 - 221
  • [49] Diffusion tensor imaging of the corticospinal tracts after cerebral hemispherectomy
    Wakamoto, H
    Eluvathinga, T
    Makki, M
    Behen, ME
    Juhasz, C
    Muzik, O
    Sentil, S
    Chugani, DC
    Chugani, HT
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2005, 58 : S94 - S94
  • [50] VOXELWISE ANALYSIS OF CEREBRAL DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING IN PRION DISEASES
    Porter, M. C.
    Hyare, H.
    De Vita, E.
    Thompson, A.
    Lukic, A.
    Yousry, T.
    Rudge, P.
    Mead, S.
    Collinge, J.
    Thornton, J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 83 (03):