Imaging and prostate cancer chemoprevention: Current diagnosis and future directions

被引:3
|
作者
Littrup, PJ
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Karmanos Canc Inst, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiol, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Dept Urol, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00954-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Identifying appropriate patients as targets for prostate cancer chemoprevention is a daunting task due to the multiple known and unknown factors contributing to patients' risk profiles. Confirmation of the extent and location of early prostate cancers, as well as prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), also requires improved image guidance of biopsy to contain costs. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in conjunction with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and digital rectal examination (DRE) have been the front-line tests for early prostate cancer. Although advances in MRI continue to improve its accuracy, limited availability and higher costs preclude its widespread use for chemoprevention trials. Improved biopsy risk assessment has been achieved by categorizing TRUS grayscale and vascular findings for each biopsy region. In addition, concomitant suspicious TRUS findings also improved cancer yield per biopsy, as well as the amount and grade of tumor per core. However, TRUS remains operator dependent despite advancements in grayscale and vascular imaging. Additional risk parameters are needed to better localize small disease foci and improve the overall diagnostic performance while containing costs. Future work may improve the specificity of tissue characterization to produce reliable noninvasive biomarkers for monitoring chemoprevention responses of early prostate cancer or PIN. (C) 2001, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 123
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Screening for Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions
    Gershman, Boris
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2015, 1 (02): : 147 - 148
  • [22] Gene therapy of prostate cancer: current and future directions
    Mabjeesh, NJ
    Zhong, H
    Simons, JW
    ENDOCRINE-RELATED CANCER, 2002, 9 (02) : 115 - 139
  • [23] Statins and breast cancer: Future directions in chemoprevention
    Santa-Maria C.A.
    Stearns V.
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2013, 5 (3) : 161 - 169
  • [24] Cancer chemoprevention: lessons learned and future directions
    D E Brenner
    A J Gescher
    British Journal of Cancer, 2005, 93 : 735 - 739
  • [25] Cancer chemoprevention: lessons learned and future directions
    Brenner, DE
    Gescher, AJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 93 (07) : 735 - 739
  • [26] Errors in cancer diagnosis: Current understanding and future directions
    Singh, Hardeep
    Sethi, Saurabh
    Raber, Martin
    Petersen, Laura A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (31) : 5009 - 5018
  • [27] Imaging of Cancer Immunotherapy: Current Approaches and Future Directions
    Nishino, Mizuki
    Hatabu, Hiroto
    Hodi, F. Stephen
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 290 (01) : 9 - 22
  • [28] Imaging prostate cancer: Current and future applications
    El-Gabry, EA
    Halpern, EJ
    Strup, SE
    Gomella, LG
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2001, 15 (03): : 325 - 336
  • [29] Current prospects for the chemoprevention of prostate cancer
    Kirby, Roger
    McNicholas, Tom
    Fitzpatrick, John
    TRENDS IN UROLOGY & MENS HEALTH, 2011, 2 (02) : 32 - 34
  • [30] Current standards and future directions for prostate cancer radiation therapy
    Pinkawa, Michael
    Schoth, Felix
    Boehmer, Dirk
    Hatiboglu, Gencay
    Sharabi, Andrew
    Song, Danny
    Eble, Michael J.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2013, 13 (01) : 75 - 88