Imaging and prostate cancer chemoprevention: Current diagnosis and future directions

被引:3
|
作者
Littrup, PJ
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Karmanos Canc Inst, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiol, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Dept Urol, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00954-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Identifying appropriate patients as targets for prostate cancer chemoprevention is a daunting task due to the multiple known and unknown factors contributing to patients' risk profiles. Confirmation of the extent and location of early prostate cancers, as well as prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), also requires improved image guidance of biopsy to contain costs. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in conjunction with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and digital rectal examination (DRE) have been the front-line tests for early prostate cancer. Although advances in MRI continue to improve its accuracy, limited availability and higher costs preclude its widespread use for chemoprevention trials. Improved biopsy risk assessment has been achieved by categorizing TRUS grayscale and vascular findings for each biopsy region. In addition, concomitant suspicious TRUS findings also improved cancer yield per biopsy, as well as the amount and grade of tumor per core. However, TRUS remains operator dependent despite advancements in grayscale and vascular imaging. Additional risk parameters are needed to better localize small disease foci and improve the overall diagnostic performance while containing costs. Future work may improve the specificity of tissue characterization to produce reliable noninvasive biomarkers for monitoring chemoprevention responses of early prostate cancer or PIN. (C) 2001, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 123
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chemoprevention of prostate cancer: Current status and future directions
    Lieberman, R
    CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 2002, 21 (3-4) : 297 - 309
  • [2] Chemoprevention in Prostate Cancer: Current Perspective and Future Directions
    Rivero, J. Ricardo, Jr.
    Thompson, Ian M., Jr.
    Liss, Michael A.
    Kaushik, Dharam
    COLD SPRING HARBOR PERSPECTIVES IN MEDICINE, 2018, 8 (10):
  • [3] Chemoprevention of Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions
    Ronald Lieberman
    Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 2002, 21 : 297 - 309
  • [4] Breast cancer chemoprevention: Current status and future directions
    Wickerham, DL
    Tan-Chiu, E
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2001, 28 (03) : 253 - 259
  • [5] Lung cancer chemoprevention: current status and future directions
    Mao, Jenny T.
    Durvasula, Ravi
    CURRENT PULMONOLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 1 (01) : 9 - 20
  • [6] Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: Current Approachesand Future Directions
    Waseem Khaliq
    Kala Visvanathan
    Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 2012, 1 (1) : 33 - 41
  • [7] Current and future status of prostate cancer chemoprevention
    Fujimoto, Naohiro
    Nomura, Masayoshi
    Matsumoto, Tetsuro
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2006, 6 (01) : 59 - 71
  • [8] Lung cancer chemoprevention: current status and future directions
    Jenny T. Mao
    Ravi Durvasula
    Current Respiratory Care Reports, 2012, 1 (1): : 9 - 20
  • [9] Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: Current Approaches and Future Directions
    Khaliq, Waseem
    Visvanathan, Kala
    CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 1 (01): : 33 - 41
  • [10] Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer chemoprevention: Current status and future directions for agent development
    Lieberman, R
    UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (2A) : 83 - 90