PSMA PET predicts metastasis-free survival in the setting of salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy

被引:7
|
作者
Wenzel, Mike [1 ,2 ]
Hussein, Rada [3 ]
Maurer, Tobias [3 ,4 ]
Karakiewicz, Pierre, I [2 ]
Tilki, Derya [3 ,4 ]
Graefen, Markus [3 ]
Wuernschimmel, Christoph [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Urol, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Montreal, Div Urol, Canc Prognost & Hlth Outcomes Unit, Hlth Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin Prostate Canc Ctr, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
PSMA PET; Prostate cancer; Salvage radiotherapy; Radical prostatectomy; Metastasis-free survival; ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY; MEN; RADIATION; OUTCOMES; THERAPY; PHASE-3; CANCER; PSA;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.06.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: To evaluate the impact of PSMA PET (prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography) findings prior to salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP) on metastasis-free survival (MFS). Patients and methods: Between 01/2012 and 12/2018, 1,599 patients received SRT for biochemical recurrence after RP at our institution. Five-year MFS of "positive PSMA PET" (n = 49) vs. "negative PSMA PET" (n = 106) vs. "no PSMA PET" (n = 1,599) prior to SRT was determined. For all time to event analyses, uni- and multivariable Cox's proportional hazards models and univariable Kaplan-Meier analyses were applied, with a significance threshold of P < 0.05. Further 4:1 propensity score matching for patient, cancer and treatment characteristics was performed to account for residual differences between groups. Results: Of PSMA PET patients, 106 patients exhibited "negative PSMA PET" (68.4%) and 49 exhibited "positive PSMA PET" (31.6%). Median PSA at recurrence did not differ between groups (0.2 ng/ml; P= 0.4). After 4:1 propensity score matching, 5-year MFS between "no PSMA PET" and "negative PSMA PET" was 94.4 vs. 93.0%, respectively (P = 0.8). For "no PSMA PET" versus "positive PSMA PET", 5-year MFS was significantly lower in "positive PSMA PET" (92.3 vs. 48.5%, respectively P < 0.0001). Finally, "positive PSMA PET" was independently associated with worse MFS compared to "no PSMA PET" after multivariable adjustment in the overall cohort (HR 13.8, CI 7.5-25.2, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Locoregional positive PSMA PET findings in recurrent patients after RP are highly predictive of worse MFS in the setting of SRT. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7.e1 / 7.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and salvage radiotherapy in patients with very low PSA after radical prostatectomy
    Farolfi, A.
    Calderoni, L.
    Vara, G.
    Perez Lopez, B.
    Lambertini, A.
    Cervati, V.
    Siepe, G.
    Morganti, G.
    Castellucci, P.
    Fanti, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 : S538 - S538
  • [32] Hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy
    Bulychkin, P.
    Tkachev, S.
    Mikhailova, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S625 - S625
  • [33] Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy
    Höcht, S
    Wiegel, T
    Schostak, M
    Hinkelbein, W
    ONKOLOGIE, 2002, 25 (03): : 201 - 206
  • [34] Early Salvage Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy
    Parker, Christopher
    Catton, Charles
    Sydes, Matthew R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (03) : E45 - E45
  • [35] Adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy
    Bortolato, B.
    Zanni, D.
    Botturi, M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 : 83 - 83
  • [36] MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY PREDICTS SALVAGE RADIOTHERAPY OUTCOMES FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Sharma, Vidit
    Nehra, Avinash
    Colicchia, Michele
    Westerman, Mary E.
    Froemming, Adam T.
    Mynderse, Lance A.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E1363 - E1364
  • [37] Toxicity of PSMA-PET-based Salvage Radiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated Boost for Patients with Recurrence of Prostate Cancer after radical Prostatectomy
    Vogel, M. M. E.
    Kessel, K. A.
    Eiber, M.
    Gschwend, J. E.
    Combs, S. E.
    Schiller, K.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2020, 196 (SUPPL 1) : S160 - S160
  • [38] Predictors of improved biochemical progression free survival for salvage prostate bed radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy.
    Wright, Emma Grace
    Challapalli, Amarnath
    White, Paul
    Persad, Rajendra
    Masson, Susan
    Kirk, Hannah
    Hilman, Serena
    Koupparis, Anthony
    Rowe, Edward
    Bahl, Amit
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (06)
  • [39] Metastasis-Free Survival and Patterns of Distant Metastatic Disease After Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-PET)-Guided Salvage Radiation Therapy in Recurrent or Persistent Prostate Cancer After Prostatectomy
    Zamboglou, Constantinos
    Strouthos, Iosif
    Sahlmann, Joerg
    Farolfi, Andrea
    Serani, Francesca
    Medici, Federica
    Cavallini, Letizia
    Morganti, Alessio Guiseppe
    Trapp, Christian
    Koerber, Stefan A.
    Peeken, Jan C.
    Vogel, Marco M. E.
    Schiller, Kilian
    Combs, Stephanie E.
    Eiber, Matthias
    Vrachimis, Alexis
    Ferentinos, Konstantinos
    Spohn, Simon K. B.
    Kirste, Simon
    Gratzke, Christian
    Ruf, Juri
    Grosu, Anca-Ligia
    Ceci, Francesco
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    Miksch, Jonathan
    Kroeze, Stephanie
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Lanzafame, Helena
    Fanti, Stefano
    Hruby, George
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Emmett, Louise
    Schmidt-Hegemann, Nina Sophie
    Henkenberens, Christoph
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 113 (05): : 1015 - 1024
  • [40] Predictive value of 68GA-PSMA PET/CT in men with biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy, undergoing salvage radiotherapy
    Serani, F.
    Lanzafame, H.
    Farolfi, A.
    Malizia, C.
    Mei, R.
    Medici, F.
    Aluisio, G.
    Fanti, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (SUPPL 1) : S443 - S443