Bureaucratic corruption, environmental policy and inbound USFDI: theory and evidence

被引:173
|
作者
Fredriksson, PG
List, JA
Millimet, DL
机构
[1] So Methodist Univ, Dept Econ, Dallas, TX 75275 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Econ, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
political economy; corruption; foreign direct investment; firm location; environmental regulations; pollution haven;
D O I
10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00016-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Previous studies have proposed that equilibrium capital flows are affected by environmental regulations-the commonly coined 'pollution haven' hypothesis. We revisit this issue by treating environmental policies as endogenous and allowing governmental corruption to influence foreign direct investment patterns. Via these two simple extensions, we are able to provide a much richer model of international capital flows. The theoretical model presumes that the effect of corruption on FDI operates via two channels: corruption affects capital flows through its impact on environmental policy stringency and due to greater theft of public funds earmarked for public spending. We empirically examine the implications of the model using US state-level panel data from four industrial sectors over the period 1977-1987. Empirical results suggest environmental policy and corruption both play a significant role in determining the spatial allocation of inbound US FDI. In addition, the estimated effect of environmental policy is found to depend critically on exogeneity assumptions. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1407 / 1430
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Corruption and Investment: Theory and Evidence from China
    Zheng, Bingyong
    Xiao, Junji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2020, 175 : 40 - 54
  • [42] Does environmental policy stringency discourage inbound tourism in the G7 countries? Evidence from panel quantile regression
    Durani, Farah
    Cong, Phan The
    Syed, Qasim Raza
    Apergis, Nicholas
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (06) : 15109 - 15123
  • [43] Governance regimes, corruption and growth: Theory and evidence
    Aidt, Toke
    Dutta, Jayasri
    Sena, Vania
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2008, 36 (02) : 195 - 220
  • [44] Pollution, shadow economy and corruption: Theory and evidence
    Biswas, Amit K.
    Farzanegan, Mohammad Reza
    Thum, Marcel
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 75 : 114 - 125
  • [45] The effect of particularism on corruption: Theory and empirical evidence
    Rotondi, Valentina
    Stanca, Luca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 51 : 219 - 235
  • [46] Environmental policy-making: From party competition to bureaucratic politics?
    Reitan, M
    Stigen, IM
    [J]. TIDSSKRIFT FOR SAMFUNNSFORSKNING, 2000, 41 (03): : 405 - 434
  • [47] Structuring Bureaucratic Performance? Assessing the Policy Impact of Environmental Agency Design
    Woods, Neal D.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (17)
  • [48] Corruption, agency costs and dividend policy: International evidence
    Quoc Trung Tran
    [J]. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 76 : 325 - 334
  • [49] Local corruption and dividend policy: Evidence from Vietnam
    Tran, Quoc Trung
    [J]. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2021, 70 : 195 - 205
  • [50] Local corruption and dividend policy: Evidence from China
    Dong, Bin
    Chen, Yizi
    Fan, Cunbin
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 47