Hand position affects saccadic reaction times in monkeys and humans

被引:12
|
作者
Thura, David
Boussaoud, Driss
Meunier, Martine
机构
[1] CNRS, Inst Neurosci Cognit Mediterranee, Unite Mixte Rech 6193, Marseille, France
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
关键词
D O I
10.1152/jn.01271.2007
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In daily life, activities requiring the hand and eye to work separately are as frequent as activities requiring tight eye-hand coordination, and we effortlessly switch from one type of activity to the other. Such flexibility is unlikely to be achieved without each effector "knowing" where the other one is at all times, even when it is static. Here, we provide behavioral evidence that the mere position of the static hand affects one eye movement parameter: saccadic reaction time. Two monkeys were trained and 11 humans instructed to perform nondelayed or delayed visually guided saccades to either a right or a left target while holding their hand at a location either near or far from the eye target. From trial to trial, target locations and hand positions varied pseudorandomly. Subjects were tested both when they could and when they could not see their hand. The main findings are 1) the presence of the static hand in the workspace did affect saccade initiation; 2) this interaction persisted when the hand was invisible; 3) it was strongly influenced by the delay duration: hand-target proximity retarded immediate saccades, whereas it could hasten delayed saccades; and 4) this held true both for humans and for each of the two monkeys. We propose that both visual and nonvisual hand position signals are used by the primates' oculomotor system for the planning and execution of saccades, and that this may result in a hand-eye competition for spatial attentional resources that explains the delay-dependent reversal observed.
引用
收藏
页码:2194 / 2202
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing the manipulative potentials of monkeys, apes and humans from hand proportions: implications for hand evolution
    Liu, Ming-Jin
    Xiong, Cai-Hua
    Hu, Di
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 283 (1843)
  • [42] Slowed Saccadic Reaction Times in Seemingly Normal Parts of Glaucomatous Visual Fields
    Thepass, Gijs
    Lemij, Hans G.
    Vermeer, Koenraad A.
    van der Steen, Johannes
    Pel, Johan J. M.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [43] Processing emotional stimuli: Comparison of saccadic and manual-choice reaction times
    Bannerman, R. L.
    Milders, M.
    Sahraie, A.
    PERCEPTION, 2007, 36 : 34 - 34
  • [44] A "Gap Effect" on Stop Signal Reaction Times in a Human Saccadic Countermanding Task
    Stevenson, Scott A.
    Elsley, James K.
    Corneil, Brian D.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 101 (02) : 580 - 590
  • [45] Saccadic Reaction Times to Audiovisual Stimuli Show Effects of Oscillatory Phase Reset
    Diederich, Adele
    Schomburg, Annette
    Colonius, Hans
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (10):
  • [46] SACCADIC AND MANUAL REACTION-TIMES TO STIMULI INITIATED BY EYE OR FINGER MOVEMENTS
    GRAEFE, TM
    VAUGHAN, J
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1978, 11 (02) : 97 - 99
  • [47] DEVELOPMENT OF ATTENTIONAL DISENGAGEMENT REVEALED IN SACCADIC REACTION-TIMES IN YOUNG INFANTS
    MATSUZAWA, M
    SHIMOJO, S
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1995, 36 (04) : S596 - S596
  • [48] FACILITATION OF REACTION-TIMES WITH GAP PARADIGM - COMPARISON OF MANUAL AND SACCADIC RESPONSES
    IWASAKI, S
    ERGONOMICS, 1990, 33 (06) : 833 - 850
  • [49] Decisional space modulates visual categorization - Evidence from saccadic reaction times
    Ramon, Meike
    Sokhn, Nayla
    Caldara, Roberto
    COGNITION, 2019, 186 : 42 - 49
  • [50] Effects of warning signals on saccadic reaction times and event-related potentials
    Spantekow, A
    Krappmann, P
    Everling, S
    Flohr, H
    CURRENT OCULOMOTOR RESEARCH: PHYSIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS, 1999, : 85 - 87