Methodology and instrumentation for testing the weak equivalence principle in stratospheric free fall

被引:21
|
作者
Iafolla, V [1 ]
Nozzoli, S
Lorenzini, EC
Milyukov, V
机构
[1] CNR, Ist Fis Spazio Interplanetario, I-00133 Rome, Italy
[2] Harvard Smithsonian Ctr Astrophys, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Sternberg Astron Inst, Moscow 119899, Russia
来源
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS | 1998年 / 69卷 / 12期
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.1149261
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
The use of the GiZero free-fall facility for testing the weak equivalence principle is discussed in this article. GiZero consists of a vacuum capsule, released from a balloon at an altitude of 40 km, which shields an experimental apparatus free falling inside the capsule itself. The expected residual acceleration external to the detector is 10(-12) g (with g the Earth's gravitational acceleration) for the 30 s free fall. A common-mode rejection factor of about 10(-4) reduces the residual noise differential output to only 10(-16) g. The gravity detector is a differential accelerometer with two test masses with coincident center of masses (i.e., zero baseline) with capacitive pick ups. Preparatory experiments have been conducted in the laboratory with a precursor detector by measuring controlled gravity signals, at low frequency, and by observing the Luni-Solar tides. The estimated accuracy in testing the weak equivalence principle, with a 95% confidence level, is 5 x 10(-15) in a 30 s free fall. When compared to orbital free-fall experiments, the GiZero experiment can be considered as a valid compromise which is able to satisfy the requirement for improving significantly the experimental accuracy in testing the equivalence principle with a substantial lower cost, the ability to recover the detector and to repeat the experiment at relatively short time intervals. (C) 1998 American Institute of Physics. [S0034-6748(98)00412-2].
引用
收藏
页码:4146 / 4151
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Metric fluctuations and the weak equivalence principle
    Goeklue, Ertan
    Laemmerzahl, Claus
    CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2008, 25 (10)
  • [32] Weak equivalence principle in quantum space
    Gnatenko, Kh. P.
    Tkachuk, V. M.
    FRONTIERS IN ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2022, 9
  • [33] A NEW TEST OF THE WEAK EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE
    PUSCH, GD
    GENERAL RELATIVITY AND GRAVITATION, 1987, 19 (03) : 225 - 231
  • [34] Galaxy satellites and the weak equivalence principle
    Keselman, Jose Ariel
    Nusser, Adi
    Peebles, P. J. E.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2009, 80 (06):
  • [35] Quantal Definition of the Weak Equivalence Principle
    Camacho, A.
    Camacho-Guardia, Arturo
    PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS OF GRAVITATION, 2009, 1122 : 209 - +
  • [36] Electrostatic Positioning System for a free fall test at drop tower Bremen and an overview of tests for the Weak Equivalence Principle in past, present and future
    Sondag, Andrea
    Dittus, Hansjoerg
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2016, 58 (04) : 644 - 677
  • [37] TESTING THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE WITH NEUTRINOS
    MINAKATA, H
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS B, 1995, : 303 - 307
  • [38] Testing the equivalence principle on a trampoline
    Reasenberg, RD
    Phillips, JD
    CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2001, 18 (13) : 2435 - 2445
  • [39] Testing the Weak Equivalence Principle Using Optical and Near-infrared Crab Pulses
    Leung, Calvin
    Hui, Beili
    Harris, Sophia
    Brown, Amy
    Gallicchio, Jason
    Nguyen, Hien
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 861 (01):
  • [40] Seismic noise effect on equivalence principle test using free-fall interferometry
    Zhou, ZB
    Luo, J
    Yan, Q
    Zhang, YZ
    Nie, YX
    CHINESE PHYSICS LETTERS, 2001, 18 (01): : 10 - 12