Elucidation of material removal mechanism in float polishing

被引:12
|
作者
Beaucamp, Anthony T. H. [1 ]
Nagai, Kotaro [1 ]
Hirayama, Tomoko [1 ]
Okada, Mutsumi [2 ]
Suzuki, Hirofumi [2 ]
Namba, Yoshiharu [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Dept Microengn, Kyoto, Japan
[2] Chubu Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Kasugai, Aichi, Japan
关键词
Float polishing; Computational fluid dynamics; Molecular dynamics; Atomic removal; Atomic transfer; SURFACE; ULTRASMOOTH; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.10.004
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Float polishing (FP) is a non-contact polishing method in which a thin layer of fluid is maintained between the workpiece and precision lap by hydrodynamic pressure effect. While it is known to consistently produce atomically flat surfaces with little or no sub-surface damage, the characteristics of polishing fluid flow and material removal have not been studied in-depth. In this research, the underlying mechanism in FP is investigated by means of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. It is revealed that a fluid gap few microns in height is generated by the wedge effect of slurry. The near wall flow condition is further investigated by direct observation and tracing of cavitation bubbles. Abrasive particle trajectory tracing is carried out with a well calibrated CFD model, and suggests that single abrasive particles move almost parallel to the workpiece surface at a relative speed of around 0.5 mm/s. Next, single abrasive particle interactions with the surface of a Ni crystal are simulated by MD to predict the required conditions in terms of kinetic energy for effective smoothing of the surface. Finally, it is concluded that the material removal mechanism in FP is dependent on a minimum size of nano-abrasive agglomerates of several 100 nm, and the existence of two types of smoothing phenomena: atomic removal and atomic transfer.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 434
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Material Removal Rate of Metal Polishing Process
    Jeng, Yeau-Ren
    Huang, Pay-Yau
    ADVANCED TRIBOLOGY, 2009, : 1013 - +
  • [42] Modeling of material removal in dynamic deterministic polishing
    Ri Pan
    Yajun Zhang
    Cong Cao
    Ming Sun
    Zhenzhong Wang
    Yunfeng Peng
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 81 : 1631 - 1642
  • [43] Modeling of material removal in dynamic deterministic polishing
    Pan, Ri
    Zhang, Yajun
    Cao, Cong
    Sun, Ming
    Wang, Zhenzhong
    Peng, Yunfeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 81 (9-12): : 1631 - 1642
  • [44] Optimization of the material removal in fluid jet polishing
    Fang, Hui
    Guo, Peiji
    Yu, Jingchi
    OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 45 (05)
  • [45] An investigation of material removal in polishing with fixed abrasives
    Zhang, L
    Tam, HY
    Yuan, CM
    Chen, YP
    Zhou, ZD
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE, 2002, 216 (01) : 103 - 112
  • [46] Modeling of a polishing tool to simulate material removal
    Guiot, Anthony
    Pattofatto, Stephane
    Tournier, Christophe
    Mathieu, Luc
    MODELLING OF MACHINING OPERATIONS, 2011, 223 : 754 - +
  • [47] Material Removal Rate in Polishing Polymethylmethacrylate Parts
    Filatov, Yu. D.
    JOURNAL OF SUPERHARD MATERIALS, 2024, 46 (03) : 212 - 220
  • [48] Magnetic float polishing of ceramics
    Raghunandan, M.
    Umehara, N.
    Noori-Khajavi, A.
    Komanduri, R.
    Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 1997, 119 (04):
  • [49] Magnetic float polishing of ceramics
    Raghunandan, M
    Umehara, N
    NooriKhajavi, A
    Komanduri, R
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1997, 119 (4A): : 520 - 528
  • [50] Effect of gradient polishing depth on material removal mechanism of silicon wafer polishing by silicon dioxide abrasive based on molecular dynamics
    Le, Jianbo
    Liu, Juan
    Mei, Miao
    Chen, Hu
    Jiang, Hong
    Yu, Dongling
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2025, 141 : 746 - 759