Seismic analysis of two-way asymmetric building systems under bi-directional seismic ground motions

被引:59
|
作者
Lin, Jui-Liang [1 ]
Tsai, Keh-Chyuan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Res Earthquake Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
来源
关键词
asymmetric building; modal analysis; modal stick; torsional effect; bi-directional ground motions; eccentricity;
D O I
10.1002/eqe.759
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
An approximation approach of seismic analysis of two-way asymmetric building systems under bidirectional seismic ground motions is proposed. The procedures of uncoupled modal response history analysis (UMRHA) are extended to two-way asymmetric buildings simultaneously excited by two horizontal components of ground motion. Constructing the relationships of two-way base shears versus two-way roof translations and base torque versus roof rotation in ADRS format for a two-way asymmetric building, each modal pushover curve bifurcates into three curves in an inelastic state. A three-degree-of-freedom (3DOF) modal stick is developed to simulate the modal pushover curve with the stated bifurcating characteristic. It requires the calculation of the synthetic earthquake and angle beta. It is confirmed that the 3DOF modal stick is consistent with single-degree-of-freedom modal stick in an elastic state. A two-way asymmetric three-story building was analyzed by UMRHA procedure incorporating the proposed 3DOF modal sticks. The analytical results are compared with those obtained from nonlinear response history analysis. It is shown that the 3DOF modal sticks are more rational and effective in dealing with the assessment of two-way asymmetric building systems under two-directional seismic ground motions. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 328
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of angle of incidence on seismic demands for inelastic single-storey structures subjected to bi-directional ground motions
    Rigato, Antonio B.
    Medina, Ricalrdo A.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2007, 29 (10) : 2593 - 2601
  • [22] Seismic response of the secondary piping system under bi-directional earthquake
    Kamble V.
    Bharti S.D.
    Shrimali M.K.
    Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2021, 22 (6) : 1221 - 1234
  • [23] Parameters affecting the seismic response of buildings under bi-directional excitation
    Fontara, Ioanna-Kleoniki M.
    Kostinakis, Konstantinos G.
    Manoukas, Grigorios E.
    Athanatopoulou, Asimina M.
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2015, 53 (05) : 957 - 979
  • [24] Floor response characteristics of NPP auxiliary building subjected to bi-directional ground motions
    Thusa, Bidhek
    Nguyen, Duy-Duan
    Azad, Md Samdani
    Lee, Tae-Hyung
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 57 (08)
  • [25] Simplified seismic analysis of flexibly supported two-way asymmetric-plan buildings
    Halabian, Amir M.
    Teymoorian, Ehsan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-STRUCTURES AND BUILDINGS, 2021, 174 (01) : 28 - 40
  • [26] Seismic fragility analysis of a reinforced concrete building under different natural ground motions
    Guneyisi, E. M.
    Altay, G.
    PROTECTION OF HISTORICAL BUILDINGS - PROHITECH 09, VOL 1 AND 2, 2009, : 1489 - +
  • [27] SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF ASYMMETRIC BUILDING FOUNDATION SYSTEMS
    SIVAKUMARAN, KS
    LIN, MS
    KARASUDHI, P
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1992, 43 (06) : 1091 - 1103
  • [28] Simplified seismic analysis of asymmetric building systems
    Lin, Jui-Liang
    Tsai, Keh-Chyuan
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2007, 36 (04): : 459 - 479
  • [29] Bi-Directional Beamforming and its Capacity Scaling in Pairwise Two-Way Communications
    Ju, Hyungsik
    Kim, Dongkyu
    Poor, H. Vincent
    Hong, Daesik
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 11 (01) : 346 - 357
  • [30] Prediction of peak seismic response of asymmetric buildings under bi-directional horizontal ground motion using equivalent SDOF model and its applicability
    Fujii, Kenji
    Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 2014, 79 (706): : 1783 - 1793