Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making

被引:142
|
作者
Ataei, Younes [1 ]
Mahmoudi, Amin [2 ]
Feylizadeh, Mohammad Reza [3 ]
Li, Deng-Feng [4 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Shiraz Branch, Young Researchers & Elite Club, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Dept Construct & Real Estate, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Shiraz Branch, Dept Ind Engn, Shiraz, Iran
[4] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Management & Econ, Chengdu 611731, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multiple Attribute Decision-Making; Group Decision-Making; Ordinal Priority Approach; ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; MCDM METHODS; SELECTION; AGGREGATION; NORMALIZATION; JUDGMENTS; RANKING; WEIGHT; TOPSIS; MADM;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105893
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The current study aims to present a new method called Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making (MADM). This method can be used in individual or group decision-making (GDM). In the case of GDM, through this method, we first determine the experts and their priorities. The priority of experts may be determined based on their experience and/or knowledge. After prioritization of the experts, the attributes are prioritized by each expert. Meanwhile, each expert ranks the alternatives based on each attribute, and the sub-attributes if any. Ultimately, by solving the presented linear programming model of this method, the weights of the attributes, alternatives, experts, and sub-attributes would be obtained simultaneously. A significant advantage of the proposed method is that it does not make use of pairwise comparison matrix, decision-making matrix (no need for numerical input), normalization methods, averaging methods for aggregating the opinions of experts (in GDM) and linguistic variables. Another advantage of this method is the possibility for experts to only comment on the attributes and alternatives for which they have sufficient knowledge and experience. The validity of the proposed model has been evaluated using several group and individual instances. Finally, the proposed method has been compared with other methods such as AHP, BWM, TOPSIS, VIKOR, PROMETHEE and QUALIFLEX. Based on comparisons among the weights and ranks using Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients, the proposed method has an applicable performance compared with other methods. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Making selection using multiple attribute decision-making with intuitionistic fuzzy sets
    Tyagi, Sanjay Kumar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE-OPERATIONS & LOGISTICS, 2018, 5 (02) : 149 - 160
  • [42] Large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) for performance measurement of healthcare construction projects: Ordinal Priority Approach
    Mahmoudi, Amin
    Abbasi, Mehdi
    Yuan, Jingfeng
    Li, Lingzhi
    APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 52 (12) : 13781 - 13802
  • [43] Priority degrees for hesitant fuzzy sets: Application to multiple attribute decision making
    Lan, Jibin
    Jin, Ruifang
    Zheng, Zhaoyi
    Hu, Mingming
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 4 : 67 - 73
  • [44] Intelligent decision-making technology for wargame by integrating three-way multiple attribute decision-making and SAC
    Peng L.
    Sun Y.
    Xue Y.
    Zhou X.
    Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46 (07): : 2310 - 2322
  • [45] Multiple attribute group decision-making method based on extended bipolar fuzzy MABAC approach
    Jana, Chiranjibe
    COMPUTATIONAL & APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2021, 40 (06):
  • [46] Multiple-attribute decision-making approach for an energy-efficient facility layout design
    Lei Yang
    Jochen Deuse
    Pingyu Jiang
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013, 66 : 795 - 807
  • [47] A Hybrid Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Approach for Evaluating Weapon Systems under Fuzzy Environment
    Yang, Shanliang
    Wang, Song
    Xu, Xiao
    Li, Ge
    2014 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY (FSKD), 2014, : 204 - 210
  • [48] Multiple-attribute decision-making approach for an energy-efficient facility layout design
    Yang, Lei
    Deuse, Jochen
    Jiang, Pingyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 66 (5-8): : 795 - 807
  • [49] Am method for multiple-attribute decision-making with incomplete attribute weight information
    Zhang, Y
    Fan, ZP
    Yu, CH
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2: MODERN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND INNOVATION IN ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT, 2005, : 645 - 648
  • [50] Multiple attribute decision-making approach based on dual hesitant fuzzy Frank aggregation operators
    Tang, Xiaoan
    Yang, Shanlin
    Pedrycz, Witold
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 68 : 525 - 547