Cost-effectiveness of Aducanumab and Donanemab for Early Alzheimer Disease in the US

被引:59
|
作者
Ross, Eric L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Weinberg, Marc S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Arnold, Steven E. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] McLean Hosp, Dept Psychiat, 115 Mill St, Belmont, MA 02178 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
TASK-FORCE; DEMENTIA; HEALTH; CARE; PROGRESSION; MORTALITY; SCORES;
D O I
10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0315
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE Several anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies have been developed for slowing the progression of Alzheimer disease (AD). Among the furthest developed are aducanumab, which received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration in 2021, and donanemab, which is currently undergoing phase 3 trials. The cost-effectiveness of these treatments has not been established. Objectives To estimate the cost-effectiveness of aducanumab and donanemab relative to standard care for early AD in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants A decision analytic model was used to estimate the lifetime health and economic outcomes of adults with early AD, from US healthcare sector and societal perspectives. Simulated patients had a mean (SD) age of 75.2 (5.5) years; 65% had mild cognitive impairment and 35% had mild dementia. Analyses were conducted from April 6, 2021, to January 20, 2022. Interventions Standard care, aducanumab (selected inputs including disease progression hazard ratio [HR] of 0.89 [95% CI, 0.63-1.15], annual price of $28 000, and twice-yearly monitoring with magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] of the brain), or donanemab (selected inputs including disease progression HR of 0.68 [95% CI, 0.44-0.99], annual price of $28 000, and twice-yearly monitoring with MRI of the brain and amyloid positron emission tomography [PET] monitoring). Donanemab was switched to placebo after substantial amyloid reduction on PET imaging, which occurred in 27% of patients at 6 months and 55% of patients at 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs); costs, in 2020 US dollars; incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs); and value-based prices, defined as the maximum price at which a treatment would be cost-effective given a cost-effectiveness threshold of ICER of $150 000/QALY. Results Lifetime QALYs increased by 0.133 with aducanumab and 0.408 with donanemab. Total health care sector and societal costs increased by $130 100 and $127 800, respectively, with aducanumab and by $78 700 and $71 600, respectively, with donanemab, driven largely by drug costs ($119 000 for aducanumab and $44 600 for donanemab). Health care sector and societal ICERs relative to standard care were $981 000/QALY and $964 000/QALY, respectively, for aducanumab and $193 000/QALY and $176 000/QALY, respectively, for donanemab. In sensitivity analysis, aducanumab's value-based price remained less than $50 000/y, even when assuming a 90% reduction in disease progression. Donanemab's value-based price surpassed $50 000/y once its efficacy exceeded 50%. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that at current expected prices, neither aducanumab nor donanemab would be cost-effective for early AD in the US. Donanemab's dosing scheme, in which patients suspend treatment on achieving substantial amyloid reductions, may provide a rubric by which sufficiently effective anti-amyloid antibody treatments could be cost-effective even when priced comparably to other biologics.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 487
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-effectiveness of cerebrospinal biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease
    Spencer A. W. Lee
    Luciano A. Sposato
    Vladimir Hachinski
    Lauren E. Cipriano
    Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, 9
  • [22] Use of Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease-Reply
    Evans, Cynthia D.
    Sims, John R.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 330 (23): : 2304 - 2305
  • [23] Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of the Pharmacological Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia
    Versijpt, Jan
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2014, 42 : S19 - S25
  • [24] TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 4: Topline Study Results Directly Comparing Donanemab to Aducanumab on Amyloid Lowering in Early, Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease
    Salloway, Stephen
    Lee, Elly
    Papka, Michelle
    Pain, Andrew
    Oru, Ena
    Ferguson, Margaret B.
    Wang, Hong
    Case, Michael
    Lu, Ming
    Collins, Emily C.
    Brooks, Dawn A.
    Sims, John
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2023, 9 : S67 - S67
  • [25] Pravastatin cost-effectiveness for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the US
    Hay, JW
    Yuan, Y
    Ford, I
    McGuire, A
    Shepherd, J
    CIRCULATION, 1997, 96 (08) : 1017 - 1017
  • [26] Assessing cost-effectiveness of early intervention in Alzheimer's disease: An open-source modeling framework
    Green, Colin
    Handels, Ron
    Gustavsson, Anders
    Wimo, Anders
    Winblad, Bengt
    Skoldunger, Anders
    Jonsson, Linus
    ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2019, 15 (10) : 1309 - 1321
  • [27] Cost-Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging with a New Contrast Agent for the Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease
    Biasutti, Maria
    Dufour, Natacha
    Ferroud, Clotilde
    Dab, William
    Temime, Laura
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [28] Cost-Effectiveness of the Use of Biomarkers in Cerebrospinal Fluid for Alzheimer's Disease
    Valcarcel-Nazco, Cristina
    Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth
    Luis Molinuevo, Jose
    Mar, Javier
    Castilla, Ivan
    Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2014, 42 (03) : 777 - 788
  • [29] Health utilities in Alzheimer’s disease and implications for cost-effectiveness analysis
    Peter J. Neumann
    PharmacoEconomics, 2005, 23 : 537 - 541
  • [30] Deep brain stimulation for Alzheimer disease: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis
    Keyvan Mirsaeedi-Farahani
    C. H. Halpern
    G. H. Baltuch
    D. A. Wolk
    S. C. Stein
    Journal of Neurology, 2015, 262 : 1191 - 1197