Challenges Hindering Widespread Adoption of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery

被引:4
|
作者
Goldberg, Jacob L. [1 ]
Hartl, Roger [1 ]
Elowitz, Eric [1 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med, NewYork Presbyterian Hosp, Dept Neurol Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Acceptance; Challenges; Cost; Minimally invasive spinal surgery; Training; LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; SCREW PLACEMENT; PEDICLE SCREWS; THORACIC SPINE; FLUOROSCOPY; NAVIGATION; COMPLICATIONS; ACCURACY; METAANALYSIS; MINIMUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.129
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) techniques offer several beneficial prospects and are being increasingly requested by patients. However, these techniques have not been uniformly adopted by spinal surgeons, and they remain controversial among some. Several barriers have prevented widespread adoption of MISS. These include concerns regarding high start-up costs, limited evidence base, and lack of surgeon training. In addition, the unique approaches involved in MISS expose spinal surgeons to unfamiliar anatomy. Further, while MISS can address a growing spectrum of spinal pathology, some conditions, as well as complications encountered during MISS procedures, require open surgery. This requires surgeons to not only acquire the new and specialized MISS skillset but also maintain their ability to perform open surgery. These factors present challenges common to developing and innovative surgical techniques. Here, we review the barriers preventing wider adoption of MISS and present a framework to promote the safe and effective growth of MISS.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 232
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimally invasive spine surgery in spinal infections
    Verdu-Lopez, Francisco
    Vanaclocha-Vanaclocha, Vicente
    Mayorga-Villa, Juan D.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 61 (03) : 303 - 315
  • [22] Spinal Biologics in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Surgery
    Chang, Kevin Y.
    Hsu, Wellington K.
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY, 2018, 2018
  • [23] Anesthesia for minimally invasive cranial and spinal surgery
    Schubert, A
    Deogaonkar, A
    Lotto, M
    Niezgoda, J
    Luciano, M
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 18 (01) : 47 - 56
  • [24] Minimally Invasive Surgery for Spinal Metastasis: A Review
    Flynn, Scott C.
    Eli, Ilyas M.
    Ghogawala, Zoher
    Yew, Andrew Y.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 159 : E32 - E39
  • [26] Augmented reality for minimally invasive spinal surgery
    Avrumova, Fedan
    Lebl, Darren R.
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 9
  • [27] Spinal metastasis: The rise of minimally invasive surgery
    McCabe, Fergus J.
    Jadaan, Mutaz M.
    Byrne, Fergus
    Devitt, Aiden T.
    McCabe, John P.
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2022, 20 (05): : 328 - 333
  • [28] Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal trauma
    Walker, Corey T.
    Xu, David S.
    Godzik, Jakub
    Turner, Jay D.
    Uribe, Juan S.
    Smith, William D.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (06)
  • [29] Minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery Response
    Wang, Michael Y.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 18 (01) : 3 - 3
  • [30] Review: Complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery
    Perez-Cruet, MJ
    Fessler, RG
    Perin, NI
    NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (05) : S26 - S36