Exploration of Teammate Trust and Interaction Dynamics in Human-Autonomy Teaming

被引:24
|
作者
Demir, Mustafa [1 ]
McNeese, Nathan J. [2 ]
Gorman, Jaime C. [3 ]
Cooke, Nancy J. [1 ]
Myers, Christopher W. [4 ]
Grimm, David A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Human Syst Engn, Ira A Fulton Sch Engn, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Human Ctr Comp, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Ind Psychol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[4] Agents Branch, Cognit Sci, Models, Dayton, OH 45433 USA
[5] Georgia Inst Technol, Engn Psychol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
Automation; Task analysis; Navigation; Autonomous agents; Training; Particle measurements; Monitoring; Artificial intelligence; dynamical systems; team coordination; trust; unmanned air vehicle systems; RECURRENCE PLOTS; AUTOMATION; PERFORMANCE; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1109/THMS.2021.3115058
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This article considers human-autonomy teams (HATs) in which two human team members interact and collaborate with an autonomous teammate to achieve a common task while dealing with unexpected technological failures that were imposed either in automation or autonomy. A Wizard of Oz methodology is used to simulate the autonomous teammate. One of the critical aspects of HAT performance is the trust that develops over time as team members interact with each other in a dynamic task environment. For this reason, it is important to examine the dynamic nature of teammate trust through real-time measures of team interactions. This article examines team interaction and trust to understand better how they change under automation and autonomy failures. Thus, we address two research questions: 1) How does trust in HATs evolve over time?; and 2) How is the relationship between team interaction and trust impacted by the failures? We hypothesize that trust in HATs will decrease as autonomy failures increase. We also hypothesize that team interaction would be related to the development of trust and recovery from the failures. The results implicate three general trends: 1) team interaction dynamics are linked to the development of trust in HATs; 2) trust in the autonomous teammate is only associated with recovery from autonomy failures; 3) team interaction dynamics are related to both automation and autonomy failure recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 705
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Observable and Attention-Directing BDI Agents for Human-Autonomy Teaming
    Archibald, Blair
    Calder, Muffy
    Sevegnani, Michele
    Xu, Mengwei
    ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021, (348): : 167 - 175
  • [42] Are Teammate Trust and Confidence Dissociable in Risk Intensive Human Machine Teaming?
    Blitch, John G.
    Skinner, Anna D.
    HUMAN SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, IHSED2018, 2019, 876 : 699 - 704
  • [43] A conceptual model of team dynamical behaviors and performance in human-autonomy teaming
    Demir, Mustafa
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    Amazeen, Polemnia G.
    COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2018, 52 : 497 - 507
  • [44] EXPLICIT CONTINGENCY PLANNING FOR IMPROVED HUMAN-AUTONOMY TEAMING IN DECISION SUPPORT
    Brinton, Chris
    Fernandes, Alicia
    Kaler, Curt
    2020 INTEGRATED COMMUNICATIONS NAVIGATION AND SURVEILLANCE CONFERENCE (ICNS), 2020,
  • [45] Human-Autonomy Teaming Patterns in the Command and Control of Teams of Autonomous Systems
    Lange, Douglas S.
    Gutzwiller, Robert S.
    ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS, (EPCE 2016), 2016, 9736 : 179 - 188
  • [46] Modeling operator self-assessment in human-autonomy teaming settings
    Cummings, Mary L.
    Li, Songpo
    Zhu, Haibei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2022, 157
  • [47] Sub-patterns for Human-Autonomy Teaming: Variations on a Delegation Theme
    Miller, Christopher A.
    ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS, (EPCE 2016), 2016, 9736 : 198 - 210
  • [48] Human-autonomy Teaming: Need for a guiding team-based framework?
    O'Neill, Thomas A.
    Flathmann, Christopher
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Salas, Eduardo
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2023, 146
  • [49] Training and Verbal Communications in Human-Autonomy Teaming Under Degraded Conditions
    Johnson, Craig J.
    Demir, Mustafa
    Zabala, Garrett M.
    He, Hongbei
    Grimm, David A.
    Radigan, Cody
    Wolff, Alexandra T.
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Gorman, Jamie C.
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE AND COMPUTATIONAL ASPECTS OF SITUATION MANAGEMENT (IEEE COGSIMA), 2020, : 53 - 58
  • [50] Unmanned vehicle plan comparison visualizations for effective human-autonomy teaming
    Behymer, Kyle J.
    Mersch, Elizabeth M.
    Ruff, Heath A.
    Calhoun, Gloria L.
    Spriggs, Sarah E.
    6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS (AHFE 2015) AND THE AFFILIATED CONFERENCES, AHFE 2015, 2015, 3 : 1022 - 1029