Phased array magnetic resonance imaging for staging clinically localized prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Borre, M [1 ]
Lundorf, E
Marcussen, N
Langkilde, NC
Wolf, H
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Ctr MRI, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Inst Pathol, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Patients suffering from intra-capsular prostate cancer (T1 - 2, N0, M0) are potential candidates for curative treatment by radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. Curative intended therapy is frequently associated with substantial side effects, which makes accuracy of preoperative staging important. However, up to 40% of the patients with clinically localized disease turn out to be under-staged and should not have been subjected to curative surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the value of preoperative phased array MRI staging in patients who are candidates for radical prostatectomy. Material and methods. Ninety-five potential candidates for radical prostatectomy suspected of suffering from clinical prostate cancer underwent pre-diagnostic and pre-operative staging by magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI). The results were compared with the postoperative pathological findings including evidence of extra-capsular extension (ECE) of the tumor. The MRI results were not taken into consideration when staging the patients preoperatively or offering treatment. Radical prostatectomy was performed within a few weeks after MRI. Results. In 48 patients the diagnostic biopsy did not detect carcinoma but benign hyperplasia of the prostate (BPH), while 9 patients had T3 disease. Thirty-eight patients had clinically localized prostate cancer and underwent radical prostatectomy. In 16 cases (42%) ECE was postoperatively proven by the pathologist, while only 22 (58%) of the patients suffered from true localized prostate cancer. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI detecting ECE were 24% and 86% respectively, while the positive and negative predictive value of MRI with regard to ECE were only 57% and 61% respectively. Conclusions. Phased array MRI did not in its present form provide the necessary accuracy in preoperative staging in clinically localized prostate cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 592
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prediction of pathological tumor volume in clinically localized prostate cancer: value of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging
    Riccardo Lencioni
    Ilario Menchi
    Alessandro Paolicchi
    Marco Carini
    Andrea Amorosi
    Carlo Bartolozzi
    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 1997, 5 : 117 - 121
  • [42] Can Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Prostate Needle Biopsy, or Their Combination Predict the Laterality of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer? REPLY
    Jeong, Chang Wook
    Kwak, Cheol
    UROLOGY, 2012, 79 (06) : 1327 - 1328
  • [43] Local staging of prostate cancer: endorectal coil versus pelvic phased array MR imaging
    Renard-Penna, Raphaele
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2009, 19 (04): : F114 - F117
  • [44] Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer
    Park, Byung Kwan
    Kim, Bohyun
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Kwon, Ghee Young
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2007, 31 (04) : 534 - 538
  • [45] MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN DIAGNOSIS, STAGING AND RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Villeirs, G. M.
    De Visschere, P. J.
    Fonteyne, V. H.
    Lumen, N.
    De Meerleer, G. O.
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2010, 65 (06): : 371 - 376
  • [46] The role of 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in staging prostate cancer
    Johnston, Richard
    Wong, Lih-Ming
    Warren, Anne
    Shah, Nimish
    Neal, David
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 83 (04) : 234 - 238
  • [47] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Ingole, Sarang M.
    Mehta, Rajeev U.
    Kazi, Zubair N.
    Bhuyar, Rutuja, V
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2021, 31 (01): : 65 - 77
  • [48] The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Delineating Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Chamie, Karim
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    Finley, David S.
    Tan, Nelly
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Raman, Steven S.
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Reiter, Robert E.
    UROLOGY, 2014, 83 (02) : 369 - 375
  • [49] Improving the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    De Visschere, Pieter
    JOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 102 (01):
  • [50] THE EFFECTS OF THE TIME PERIOD BETWEEN BIOPSY AND DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING ON CANCER STAGING IN LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
    Dickinson, Louise
    Ahmed, Hashim Uddin
    Moore, Caroline
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex
    Allen, Clare
    Emberton, Mark
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (01) : 131 - 132