Soil erosion-prone area identification using multi-criteria decision analysis in Ethiopian highlands

被引:20
|
作者
Andualem, Tesfa Gebrie [1 ]
Hagos, Yonas Gebresilasie [1 ]
Kefale, Ayenew [1 ]
Zelalem, Belaynesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Debre Tabor Univ, Dept Hydraul & Water Resources Engn, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
关键词
Ribb watershed; Soil erosion; MCDA; GIS; Pair-wise comparison; HOTSPOTS; GIS;
D O I
10.1007/s40808-020-00757-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Soil erosion is a very complex natural process that refers to the detachment and transportation of topsoil from the land surface by natural agents like water, wind, and others. This process has an effect on the environment including loss of soil fertility, reduction of water bodies' depth (lakes, ponds, reservoirs, etc.), increase in water turbidity, flood hazard problems, etc. Identifying the erosion hotspot areas using different techniques is an essential tool for sustainable natural resources management. This study focusses on the mapping of soil erosion-prone areas of Ribb watershed, Upper Blue Nile, Ethiopia. This study aimed to identify the erosion of hotspot areas for the setting of effective soil and conservation strategies. Different soil erosion contributing factors, viz. Slope, land use, soil, rainfall, and stream power index, were integrated on ArcGIS 10.3 environment for determining the erosion-prone areas. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) technique was used to develop erosion hotspot areas using thematic layers pair-wise comparison tool. The weights for each thematic layer and feature were decided based on the expert's judgment and review of the literature. Hence, the results of soil erosion map showed very high, high, moderate, low, and very low vulnerability to erosion with areal coverage of 7.04%, 20.40%, 17.60%, 32.01%, and 22.95%, respectively. The findings of this study will help decision-makers to plan and carry out effective soil and water conservation practices in highly vulnerable areas to soil erosion. MCDA was found as a basic tool for determining erosion-prone areas coupled with GIS. The spatial distribution map indicated that most of the erosion-prone areas were found in northern, eastern, and northeastern parts of the watershed due to the steep slope and agricultural practice which needs integrated soil and water conservation practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1407 / 1418
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Stakeholder involvement in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Praveen Thokala
    Guruprasad Madhavan
    [J]. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 16
  • [42] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS IN ONCOLOGY: AN OVERVIEW
    Adunlin, G.
    Diaby, V
    Montero, A.
    Xiao, H.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A184 - A184
  • [43] Potential Nondominance in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Podinovski, Vladislav
    Nelyubin, Andrey
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2024, 23 (03) : 1401 - 1422
  • [44] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Boris Yatsalo
    Vladimir Didenko
    Sergey Gritsyuk
    Terry Sullivan
    [J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2015, 8 : 467 - 489
  • [45] Identifying Soil Erosion-Prone Areas in the Wadi Haly Catchment, Saudi Arabia Using Morphometric Analysis and Watershed Features
    Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh
    11421, Saudi Arabia
    [J]. Appl. Sci., 23
  • [46] Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis
    Durbach, Ian N.
    Stewart, Theodor J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 223 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [47] Modeling the context in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Labreuche, Christophe
    [J]. NEW DIMENSIONS IN FUZZY LOGIC AND RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 303 - 310
  • [48] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Didenko, Vladimir
    Gritsyuk, Sergey
    Sullivan, Terry
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2015, 8 (03) : 467 - 489
  • [49] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison
    Zlaugotne, Beate
    Zihare, Lauma
    Balode, Lauma
    Kalnbalkite, Antra
    Khabdullin, Aset
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 24 (01) : 454 - 471
  • [50] Potential Influencers Identification Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods
    Gandhi, Meera
    Muruganantham, A.
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT TRENDS IN COMPUTING 2015 (ICRTC-2015), 2015, 57 : 1179 - 1188