Flow Cytometry Panel-Reactive Antibody Screening of Anti-HLA Antibodies in the Waiting List Significantly Reduces the Occurrence of Acute Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

被引:1
|
作者
Dedinska, I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mackova, N. [4 ]
Machalekova, K. [5 ]
Miklusica, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Palkoci, B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Flalova, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cellar, M. [6 ]
Galajda, P. [3 ,7 ]
Mokan, M. [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Martin, Surgery Clin, Kollarova 2, Martin 03601, Slovakia
[2] Univ Hosp Martin, Transplant Ctr, Kollarova 2, Martin 03601, Slovakia
[3] Comenius Univ, Jessenius Fac Med, Martin, Slovakia
[4] Martinske Ctr Immunol, Martin, Slovakia
[5] BB Biocyt, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia
[6] Slovak Med Univ, FD Roosevelts Fac Hosp Banska Bystrica, Internal Clin 2, Dept Transplant Nephrol, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia
[7] Univ Hosp Martin, Clin Internal Med 1, Martin, Slovakia
关键词
GRAFT FAILURE; CLASS-I; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; RECIPIENTS; ASSAY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.04.016
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction. The presence of preformed HLA-reactive antibodies in recipient serum before transplantation has long been recognized as a prominent risk factor for a generally worse graft outcome. Screening and identification of HLA antibodies can be used to stratify patients into high-and low-risk categories. Materials and methods. We determined patients' anti-HLA antibodies using flow cytometry panel-reactive antibody (flowPRA) screening, specifying more than 5% after positive screening. According to the results of the screening test, patients were allocated to the induction immunosuppressive protocol according to the actual immunologic risk. Results. In the group of 78 patients, screening with flowPRA of anti-HLA antibodies was done twice a year. Patients were divided into 2 groups of immunologic risk (low or medium), and we chose the induction immunosuppressive protocol according to the risk. Stratification of the risk was correct, because the only predictor for development of acute rejection in the monitored period of 12 months was delayed graft function (odds ratio 33.2501; 95% confidence interval 10.0095-110.4508; P < .0001). The occurrence of acute rejection upon implementing the screening was reduced in our transplant center from 44% to 19% (P < .0001). No difference was recorded in the 12-month survival of grafts and patients according to the applied induction immunosuppressive protocol. Conclusion. We confirmed significantly reduced occurrence of acute rejection in the follow-up period of 12 months by using individualized induction according to flowPRA screening of anti-HLA antibodies. FIowPRA screening represents a suitable alternative for screening and specification of anti-HLA antibodies in case the Luminex methodology is unavailable.
引用
收藏
页码:1719 / 1723
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FLOWPRA SCREENING OF ANTIHLA ANTIBODIES IN THE WAITING LIST SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCES THE OCCURRENCE OF ACUTE REJECTION AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
    Dedinska, Ivana
    Laca, L'Udovit
    Miklusica, Juraj
    Kovacikova, Lea
    Galajda, Peter
    Mokan, Marian
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 30 : 471 - 471
  • [2] FlowPRA Screening of antiHLA Antibodies in the Waiting List Significantly Reduces the Occurrence of Acute Rejection after Kidney Transplantation
    Dedinska, Ivana
    Miklusica, Juraj
    Mackova, Nadezda
    Kovacikova, Lea
    Laca, Ludovit
    Galajda, Peter
    Mokan, Marian
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 102 : S573 - S573
  • [3] Pretransplant Kinetics of Anti-HLA Antibodies in Patients on the Waiting List for Kidney Transplantation
    Togninalli, Matteo
    Yoneoka, Daisuke
    Kolios, Antonios G. A.
    Borgwardt, Karsten
    Nilsson, Jakob
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 30 (11): : 2262 - 2274
  • [4] DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF ANTI-HLA ANTIBODIES IN PATIENTS ON THE WAITING LIST FOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
    Bonaca, Orjeta
    Plesec, Eva
    Rotar, Katja
    Vidan-Jeras, Blanka
    HLA, 2018, 91 (05) : 370 - 370
  • [5] INFLUENCE ON SUCCESS OF KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION OF PRE-EXISTING ANTI-HLA ANTIBODIES WITH DIFFERENT VALUES OF CALCULATED PANEL-REACTIVE ANTIBODY (CPRA)
    Gracheva, Liudmila
    Charlamova, Leolla
    Petrova, Larisa
    Rumiantcev, Aleksandr
    Khalikova, Diana
    Valov, Aleksei
    Bologov, Andrei
    Molchanova, Elena
    Stolyarevich, Ekaterina
    TISSUE ANTIGENS, 2015, 85 (05): : 410 - 410
  • [6] HLA PHENOTYPES AND PANEL-REACTIVE ANTIBODIES (PRA) OF THE CROATIAN ESRD PATIENTS ON THE WAITING LIST FOR CADAVERIC TRANSPLANTATION
    Batarelo, Mirica
    Palfi, Biserka
    Martinez, Natalija
    Salamunovic, Sanja
    Grubic, Zorana
    Zunec, Renata
    TISSUE ANTIGENS, 2015, 85 (05): : 429 - 429
  • [7] Flow cytometry and panel reactive antibody methods for detecting anti-HLA class-1 antibodies
    Aghaeipour, M.
    VOX SANGUINIS, 2006, 91 : 102 - 102
  • [8] Impact of anti-HLA antibodies screening techniques on waiting time on the waiting list and kidney transplant outcomes
    Lopez-Perez, Juan
    Villanego, Florentino
    Mazuecos, Auxiliadora
    Nieto, Antonio
    TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY, 2025, 90
  • [9] Effect of panel-reactive antibody positivity on graft rejection before or after kidney transplantation
    Lee, KW
    Kim, SJ
    Lee, DS
    Lee, HH
    Joh, JW
    Lee, SK
    Oh, HY
    Kim, DJ
    Kim, YG
    Huh, WS
    Oh, WI
    Lee, BB
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (07) : 2009 - 2010
  • [10] Detection of anti-HLA antibody by flow-cytometric panel reactive antibody in kidney transplant recipient with frequent episodes of acute rejection
    Masutani, Kohsuke
    Fujisaki, Akiko
    Yamada, Shunsuke
    Noguchi, Hideko
    Okabe, Yasuhiro
    Kitada, Hidehisa
    Sugitani, Atsushi
    Katafuchi, Ritsuko
    Tsuruya, Kazuhiko
    Tanaka, Masao
    Iida, Mitsuo
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 22 : 36 - 41