共 35 条
Stakeholder perspectives of the sociotechnical requirements of a telehealth wheelchair assessment service in Aotearoa/New Zealand: A qualitative analysis
被引:6
|作者:
Graham, Fiona
[1
]
Boland, Pauline
[2
,3
]
Jones, Bernadette
[1
]
Wallace, Sally
[4
]
Taylor, William
[1
]
Desha, Laura
[1
]
Maggo, Jasjot
[1
]
McKerchar, Christina
[5
]
Grainger, Rebecca
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Med, 23a Mein St, Wellington, New Zealand
[2] Univ Limerick, Sch Allied Hlth, Hlth Res Inst, Limerick, Ireland
[3] Univ Limerick, Aging Res Ctr, Hlth Res Inst, Limerick, Ireland
[4] Enable New Zealand, Christchurch, New Zealand
[5] Univ Otago, Dept Populat Hlth, Christchurch, New Zealand
关键词:
Maori;
seating;
telehealth;
telerehabilitation;
videoconferencing;
wheelchairs;
INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY;
ACCEPTANCE;
EQUITY;
D O I:
10.1111/1440-1630.12790
中图分类号:
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号:
100215 ;
摘要:
Introduction Telehealth is widely proposed to improve access and equity in provision of rehabilitation, including wheelchair assessment, yet the design requirements of telehealth wheelchair assessment that will be accepted and utilised at scale are unclear. Service design that addresses the existing inequities in outcomes for indigenous populations, such as Maori will be critical. The aim of this study was to examine the design requirements of a telehealth wheelchair assessment service from the perspectives of key stakeholders such as wheelchair users and their families, including indigenous (Maori) and health professionals including occupational therapist, and physiotherapist assessors and technicians. Methods Within a wider mixed methods design, inductive thematic analysis was applied to focus group and interview data from 23 assessors (19 occupational therapists and four physiotherapist assessors, one of whom was Maori) and 19 wheelchair users (three of whom were Maori). Results Eight themes were discerned with the final three themes emphasising the experiences of particular concern to Maori: (1) At the mercy of the system; (2) The hurdle of technology; (3) More efficient for all; (4) Lost information and connection; (5) Rights and the right way forward; (6) Cultural safety; (7) Whanaungatanga (relationship building); and (8) Summative disadvantage for Tangata whaikaha (Maori with disabilities). Themes reflected a recognition of risks and uncertainty associated with tele-delivered assessment. Conversely, advantages in access, equity, and professional competency were reimagined. Perspectives of Maori included both risks and advantages as perceived by Maori. Conclusion Substantial dissatisfaction with current wheelchair assessment services among wheelchair users provides context to the impetus for a successful design of a telehealth assessment service. Training in conducting telehealth wheelchair assessment is essential incorporating culturally safe communication practices and support of wheelchair user autonomy while identifying solutions that achieve wheelchair user goals.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 289
页数:11
相关论文