Fidelity score for ATR performance modeling

被引:2
|
作者
Blasch, E [1 ]
Lavely, E [1 ]
Ross, T [1 ]
机构
[1] USAF, Res Lab, Sensors Directorate, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
关键词
performance modeling; fidelity score; SAR; ATR;
D O I
10.1117/12.604254
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Automatic target recognition (ATR) performance modeling is dependent on model complexity, training data, and test analysis. In order to compare different ATR algorithms, we develop a fidelity score that characterizes the quality of different algorithms to meet real-world conditions. For instance, a higher fidelity ATR performance model (PM) is robust over many operating conditions (sensors, targets, environments). An ATR model that is run for one terrain, might not be applicable for all terrains, yet its operating manual clarifies its range of applicability. In this paper, we discuss a fidelity score that captures the performance application of ATR models and can be extended to different sensors over many operating conditions. The modeling quantification testing can be used as a fidelity score, validation metric, or guidance for model improvements. The goal is to provide a framework to instantiate a high fidelity model that captures theoretical, simulated, experimental, and real world data performance for use in a dynamic sensor manager.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 394
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modeling ATR processes to predict their performance by using invariance, robustness and self-refusal approach
    Kovalerchuk, Boris
    FUSION: 2009 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION FUSION, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 1139 - 1146
  • [22] Physiological fidelity or model parsimony? The relative performance of reverse-toxicokinetic modeling approaches
    Rowland, Michael A.
    Perkins, Edward J.
    Mayo, Michael L.
    BMC SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2017, 11
  • [23] BIM Cloud Score: Building Information Model and Modeling Performance Benchmarking
    Liu, Rui
    Du, Jing
    Issa, Raja R. A.
    Giel, Brittany
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 143 (04)
  • [24] Asymptotic performance of ATR in infrared images
    Ceritoglu, C
    Bitouk, D
    Miller, MI
    Schmitt, HA
    AUTOMATIC TARGET RECOGNITION XIII, 2003, 5094 : 109 - 118
  • [25] Infrared animal modeling for training ATR algorithms
    Johansson, Tommy
    Fagerstrom, Jan
    Karlsson, Mikael
    Linderhed, Anna
    Persson, Andreas
    UNMANNED-UNATTENDED SENSORS AND SENSOR NETWORKS VII, 2010, 7833
  • [26] Operating condition modeling for ATR fusion assessment
    Kahler, Bart
    Blasch, Erik
    Goodwon, Lloyd
    MULTISENSOR, MULTISOURCE INFORMATION FUSION: ARCHITECTURES, ALGORITHMS, AND APPLICATIONS 2007, 2007, 6571
  • [27] The Influence of Multipath on Ship ATR Performance
    Schimpf, Hartmut
    AUTOMATIC TARGET RECOGNITION XXI, 2011, 8049
  • [28] Confidence intervals for ATR performance metrics
    Ross, TD
    ALGORITHMS FOR SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR IMAGERY VIII, 2001, 4382 : 318 - 329
  • [29] Signal to clutter measurement and ATR performance
    Sims, SRF
    AUTOMATIC TARGET RECOGNITION VIII, 1998, 3371 : 398 - 403
  • [30] High Fidelity Optical Modeling for the TMT
    Nissly, Carl
    Seo, Byoung-Joon
    Troy, Mitchell
    Angeli, George
    Cho, Myung
    Ellerbroek, Brent
    Piatrou, Piotr
    Roberts, Lewis C., Jr.
    Shelton, J. Chris
    Wang, Lianqi
    INTEGRATED MODELING OF COMPLEX OPTOMECHANICAL SYSTEMS, 2011, 8336