Human-Automation Interaction for Autonomous Ships: Decision Support for Remote Operators

被引:6
|
作者
Porathe, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.12716/1001.15.03.03
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
At NTNU in Norway an 8-year research project has been established to (among other things) research the interaction between humans and unmanned, autonomous ships. The human will become even more important when ship operator will be located remotely in shore control centers ashore. This concept paper will take a closer look on remote decision-making by operators monitoring several ships. How can interface design help them to get quickly into-the-loop when something unexpected suddenly happens? I will in this paper suggest keeping a copy of the AI expert-system controlling the ship, updated and running in parallel in the control center to keep the operator's situation awareness during short communication glitches. Also, to design a "quickly-getting-into-the-loop-display" which automatically will appear in an alarm situation, allowing the operator just-in-time and simple-to-understand information. I will also stress the important of the concept automation transparency.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 515
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A TENTATIVE MODEL FOR ANALYSIS OF HUMAN-AUTOMATION INTERACTION IN CONTROL ROOMS
    Andersson, Jonas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 11TH BIENNIAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING SYSTEMS DESIGN AND ANALYSIS, 2012, VOL 2, 2012, : 813 - 820
  • [32] Human-Automation Interaction Strategies and Models for Life Science Applications
    Kaber, David B.
    Stoll, Norbert
    Thurow, Kerstin
    Green, Rebecca S.
    Kim, Sang-Hwan
    Mosaly, Prithima
    HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN MANUFACTURING, 2009, 19 (06): : 601 - 621
  • [33] Introducton to the Special Issue on Human-Automation Interaction in Aerospace Systems
    Feigh, Karen M.
    van Paassen, M. M.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2015, 12 (07): : 429 - 430
  • [34] The effect of distractor modality and processing code on human-automation interaction
    Rachel R. Phillips
    Poornima Madhavan
    Cognition, Technology & Work, 2011, 13 : 233 - 244
  • [35] Preface to the Special Issue on Advancing Models of Human-Automation Interaction
    Roth, Emilie M.
    Pritchett, Amy R.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2018, 12 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [36] Human-Automation Interaction in Self-Organizing Sociotechnical Systems
    Naikar, Neelam
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2018, 12 (01) : 62 - 66
  • [37] Using Formal Verification to Evaluate Human-Automation Interaction: A Review
    Bolton, Matthew L.
    Bass, Ellen J.
    Siminiceanu, Radu I.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2013, 43 (03): : 488 - 503
  • [38] Human-Automation Interaction Through Shared and Traded Control Applications
    Marcano, Mauricio
    Diaz, Sergio
    Perez, Joshue
    Castellano, Andrea
    Landini, Elisa
    Tango, Fabio
    Burgio, Paolo
    INTELLIGENT HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 2020, 2020, 1131 : 653 - 659
  • [39] The MPC elucidator: A case study in the design for human-automation interaction
    Guerlain, S
    Jamieson, GA
    Bullemer, P
    Blair, R
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2002, 32 (01): : 25 - 40
  • [40] The Human-Automation Behavioral Interaction Task (HABIT) analysis framework
    Baird, Isabelle
    Fendley, Mary E.
    Warren, Rik
    Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing, 2022, 32 (06): : 452 - 461