A nontraditional assessment framework for formal kinship homes

被引:0
|
作者
Scannapieco, M
Hegar, RL
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
This article presents a framework for assessing kinship homes that differs from traditional family foster home evaluation. Because kinship care families and situations are usually quite different from those of other prospective foster parents, distinctive criteria for approving placement of children in kinship homes are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 582
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Assessment of nontraditional students in organic chemistry
    Barrows, Russell
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 249
  • [33] ASSESSMENT OF TRADITIONAL AND NONTRADITIONAL SOURCE IMPACTS
    HARRISON, PR
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION, 1980, 30 (09): : 981 - 981
  • [34] A FORMAL FRAMEWORK FOR AUTHENTICATION
    BOYD, C
    LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1992, 648 : 273 - 292
  • [35] A Formal Framework for Adaptation
    Amja, Anne Marie
    Obaid, Abdel
    Mili, Hafedh
    Jarir, Zahi
    UBIQUITOUS NETWORKING, UNET 2017, 2017, 10542 : 81 - 94
  • [36] A Formal Framework for Stringology
    Mhaskar, Neerja
    Soltys, Michael
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE PRAGUE STRINGOLOGY CONFERENCE 2015, 2015, : 90 - 103
  • [37] A formal framework for Stringology
    Soltys, Michael
    Mhaskar, Neerja
    DISCRETE APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2020, 274 (274) : 141 - 151
  • [38] A formal framework of UML
    Zhou, J
    Ma, YL
    Li, W
    Wu, ZL
    SERP'04: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, : 151 - 157
  • [39] THE FORMAL FRAMEWORK FOR DOP
    Popela, Pavel
    Matousek, Radomil
    Sklenar, Jaroslav
    MENDEL 2008, 2008, : 235 - 240
  • [40] A Four-Nation Comparison of Kinship Care in the UK: The Relationship between Formal Kinship Care and Deprivation
    McCartan, Claire
    Bunting, Lisa
    Bywaters, Paul
    Davidson, Gavin
    Elliott, Martin
    Hooper, Jade
    SOCIAL POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 17 (04) : 619 - 635