Dynamic benefit-cost analysis for controlling perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium):: A case study

被引:5
|
作者
Eiswerth, ME
Singletary, L
Zimmerman, JR
Johnson, WS
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Econ, Whitewater, WI 53190 USA
[2] Univ Nevada Cooperat Extens, Lyon Cty Off, Yerington, NV 89447 USA
[3] Univ Nevada, Dept Resource Econ, Reno, NV 89557 USA
关键词
economic externality; economic impacts; economic threshold; GIS; GPS; invasive species; invasive weeds; normative species;
D O I
10.1614/WT-04-136R
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Perennial pepperweed, found throughout the western United States, reduces biodiversity and causes economic losses in the form of control costs as well as decreased quantity and quality of agricultural yields. The future stream of net benefits of weed management and the future point in time at which they will have accumulated enough to equal total management costs were estimated under different land-use and expansion rate scenarios. Benefits and costs were calculated in present value terms by applying a rate of discount to future values. On land used solely for grazing, the total economic returns from management did not equal total costs until 15 yr after initial treatment. However, on land used for grazing plus hay harvest, cumulative benefits equaled and began to exceed cumulative costs after 4 to 5 yr. The costs and benefits of management efforts were also estimated for a landowner, who controls an adjacent infestation before it spreads. This landowner benefited economically from weed management in as little as 5 to 6 yr, highlighting the importance of cooperative efforts to control nearby weed infestations.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 243
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Benefit-cost analysis of freeway service patrol programs: methodology and case study
    Chou, C.
    Miller-Hooks, E.
    Promisel, I.
    Advances in Transportation Studies, 2010, (20): : 81 - 96
  • [42] COST BIAS IN BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS - COMMENT
    STOBER, WJ
    FALK, LH
    EKELUND, RB
    SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1968, 34 (04) : 563 - 568
  • [43] BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS OF FAMILY PLANNING
    BLUMSTEIN, A
    CASSIDY, RG
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 1973, 7 (02) : 151 - 160
  • [44] Performance Bond Benefit-Cost Analysis
    Myers, Lorena
    Najafi, Fazil T.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2011, (2228) : 3 - 10
  • [45] IMPROVING ACCURACY OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
    BORDMAN, SL
    IEEE SPECTRUM, 1973, 10 (09) : 72 - 76
  • [46] How (Not) to Lie with Benefit-Cost Analysis
    Farrow, Scott
    ECONOMISTS VOICE, 2013, 10 (01): : 45 - 50
  • [47] Principles and Standards for Benefit-Cost Analysis
    Kumru, Cagri S.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2014, 58 (04) : 622 - 624
  • [48] Benefit-Cost Analysis of Increased Trade: An Order-of-Magnitude Estimate of the Benefit-Cost Ratio
    Feyrer, James
    Tyazhelnikov, Vladimir
    Aleman-Castilla, Benjamin
    Wong, Brad
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2023, 14 : 108 - 135
  • [49] CONVENTION AND LIMITATION IN BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
    HAMMOND, RJ
    NATURAL RESOURCES JOURNAL, 1966, 6 (02) : 195 - 222
  • [50] BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS AND TRADE POLICIES
    DASGUPTA, P
    STIGLITZ, JE
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1974, 82 (01) : 1 - 33