Disparities between the Demand for On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems and Treatment Options for Septage

被引:1
|
作者
Capps, Krista A. [6 ,7 ]
Gaur, Nandita [1 ]
Callahan, Timothy [2 ]
Orrego, Alexandra [3 ]
Bloyer, David [4 ]
Higgs, Keith [5 ]
Johnson, Daniel [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Georgia Dept Publ Hlth, Environm Hlth Sect, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[3] Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning Dist, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[4] Athens Clarke Cty Environm Serv, Athens, GA 30601 USA
[5] Douglasville Douglas Cty Water & Sewer Author, Wastewater Operat, Douglasville, GA 30134 USA
[6] Univ Georgia, Odum Sch Ecol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[7] Univ Georgia, Savannah River Ecol Lab, Athens, GA 30602 USA
来源
ACS ES&T WATER | 2021年 / 1卷 / 10期
关键词
wastewater; water treatment; septic; on-site wastewater treatment; septage; illegal waste disposal; decentralized wastewater treatment; underserved communities; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1021/acsestwater.1c00221
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
On-site wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) are essential parts of wastewater treatment infrastructure throughout the world. In the United States, OWTS serve between 20% and 25% of homes in the country. Though access to septage treatment appears to be a ubiquitous problem in the United States, this issue has received relatively little attention. Here, we examined county-level estimates of the number of OWTS and treatment options in the state of Georgia in the United States. We also used municipal and regional data collected from wastewater treatment facilities to highlight relationships among treatment options for septage disposal, the cost of septage treatment, and the amount of septage delivered to receiving plants. We conservatively estimate the state should generate at least 932000 gallons per day (GPD) but has the capacity to treat only 500000-650000 GPD. More than 70% of counties in the state do not support municipal treatment options for septage. The data we report at the municipal and regional levels highlight negative relationships between the amount of septage delivered to treatment facilities and the price of treatment. Local and state agencies must develop policies and generate the funding needed to manage the entire life cycle of wastewater generated within their jurisdictional boundaries.
引用
收藏
页码:2251 / 2258
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Contested Factors for Sustainability: Construction and Management of Household On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems
    Kaminsky, Jessica
    Javernick-Will, Amy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 139 (12)
  • [22] A Comparison of Gravity Distribution Devices Used in On-Site Domestic Wastewater Treatment Systems
    T. Patel
    N. O’Luanaigh
    L. W. Gill
    [J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2008, 191 : 55 - 69
  • [23] A Review of On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems in Western Australia from 1997 to 2011
    Gunady, Maria
    Shishkina, Natalia
    Tan, Henry
    Rodriguez, Clemencia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 2015
  • [24] Evaluation of sampling methods for monitoring effluent phosphorus for on-site wastewater treatment systems
    Johannessen, Erik
    Eikum, Arild Schanke
    Krogstad, Tore
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 65 (11) : 2049 - 2054
  • [25] Factors affecting the performance and risks to human health of on-site wastewater treatment systems
    Levett, K. J.
    Vanderzalm, J. L.
    Page, D. W.
    Dillon, P. J.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 62 (07) : 1499 - 1509
  • [26] Cost Optimization of Wastewater and Septage Treatment Process
    Karolinczak, Beata
    Milaszewski, Rafal
    Dabrowski, Wojciech
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (23)
  • [27] Treatment efficiency of package plants for on-site wastewater treatment in cold climates
    Vidal, Brenda
    Kinnunen, Juho
    Hedstrom, Annelie
    Heiderscheidt, Elisangela
    Rossi, Pekka
    Herrmann, Inga
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 342
  • [28] Alternative on-site sewage treatment systems
    Christopherson, SH
    [J]. BIOCYCLE, 2001, 42 (09) : 30 - 33
  • [29] Soil-based assessment of site suitability for on-site wastewater treatment systems: A comparison of Georgia and Missouri systems
    Miles, RJ
    West, LT
    [J]. ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 62 - 70
  • [30] Upflow Evapotranspiration System for the Treatment of On-Site Wastewater Effluent
    Curneen, Sean
    Gill, Laurence
    [J]. WATER, 2015, 7 (05): : 2037 - 2059