Cost-benefit analysis of the polypill in the primary prevention of myocardial infarction and stroke

被引:22
|
作者
Wald, Nicholas J. [1 ]
Luteijn, Johannes Michiel [1 ]
Morris, Joan K. [1 ]
Taylor, David [2 ]
Oppenheimer, Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Barts & London Sch Med & Dent, Wolfson Inst Prevent Med, London EC1M 6BQ, England
[2] UCL, Sch Pharm, BMA Tavistock House, London WC1H 9JP, England
[3] Univ Oxford Christ Church, Oxford OX1 1DP, England
关键词
Cost-benefit analysis; Polypill; Primary prevention; Cardiovascular diseases; Stroke; Myocardial infarction; PRESSURE-LOWERING DRUGS; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; BLOOD-PRESSURE; METAANALYSIS; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1007/s10654-016-0122-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The primary prevention of cardiovascular disease is a public health priority. To assess the costs and benefits of a Polypill Prevention Programme using a daily 4-component polypill from age 50 in the UK, we determined the life years gained without a first myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke, together with the total service cost (or saving) and the net cost (or saving) per year of life gained without a first MI or stroke. This was estimated on the basis of a 50 % uptake and a previously published 83 % treatment adherence. The total years of life gained without a first MI or stroke in a mature programme is 990,000 each year in the UK. If the cost of the Polypill Prevention Programme were A 1 pound per person per day, the total cost would be A 4.76 pound bn and, given the savings (at 2014 prices) of A 2.65 pound bn arising from the disease prevented, there would be a net cost of A 2.11 pound bn representing a net cost per year of life gained without a first MI or stroke of A 2120 pound. The results are robust to sensitivity analyses. A national Polypill Prevention Programme would have a substantial effect in preventing MIs and strokes and be cost-effective.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 426
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Rethinking cost-benefit analysis
    Adler, MD
    Posner, EA
    YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1999, 109 (02): : 165 - +
  • [42] The discipline of cost-benefit analysis
    Sen, A
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2000, 29 (02): : 931 - 952
  • [43] Humanizing Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Sunstein, Cass R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RISK REGULATION, 2011, 2 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [44] Pediatric cost-benefit analysis
    Schulze-Gattermann, H
    Illg, A
    Lesinski-Schiedat, A
    Schoenermark, M
    Bertram, B
    Lenarz, T
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2003, 82 (05) : 322 - 329
  • [45] Equity in cost-benefit analysis
    Hahn, Robert W.
    SCIENCE, 2021, 372 (6541) : 439 - 439
  • [46] Cost-benefit analysis is the key
    Kelnar, CJH
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2000, 83 (02) : 176 - 177
  • [47] Cost-benefit analysis and population
    Broome, J
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2000, 29 (02): : 953 - 970
  • [48] Is cost-benefit analysis for everyone?
    Sunstein, CR
    ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW, 2001, 53 (01) : 299 - 314
  • [49] Acetylsalicylic acid for the prevention of primary myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke
    Samorodskaya, I. V.
    Bolotova, E. V.
    Boytsov, S. A.
    TERAPEVTICHESKII ARKHIV, 2015, 87 (09) : 91 - 96
  • [50] Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Atkinson, Giles
    Mourato, Susana
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2008, 33 : 317 - 344