Representing default knowledge in biomedical ontologies: application to the integration of anatomy and phenotype ontologies

被引:28
|
作者
Hoehndorf, Robert [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Loebe, Frank [2 ,3 ]
Kelso, Janet [1 ]
Herre, Heinrich [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Evolutionary Anthropol, Dept Evolutionary Genet, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, IMISE, D-04107 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Leipzig, Inst Informat, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2105-8-377
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Current efforts within the biomedical ontology community focus on achieving interoperability between various biomedical ontologies that cover a range of diverse domains. Achieving this interoperability will contribute to the creation of a rich knowledge base that can be used for querying, as well as generating and testing novel hypotheses. The OBO Foundry principles, as applied to a number of biomedical ontologies, are designed to facilitate this interoperability. However, semantic extensions are required to meet the OBO Foundry interoperability goals. Inconsistencies may arise when ontologies of properties - mostly phenotype ontologies - are combined with ontologies taking a canonical view of a domain - such as many anatomical ontologies. Currently, there is no support for a correct and consistent integration of such ontologies. Results: We have developed a methodology for accurately representing canonical domain ontologies within the OBO Foundry. This is achieved by adding an extension to the semantics for relationships in the biomedical ontologies that allows for treating canonical information as default. Conclusions drawn from default knowledge may be revoked when additional information becomes available. We show how this extension can be used to achieve interoperability between ontologies, and further allows for the inclusion of more knowledge within them. We apply the formalism to ontologies of mouse anatomy and mammalian phenotypes in order to demonstrate the approach. Conclusion: Biomedical ontologies require a new class of relations that can be used in conjunction with default knowledge, thereby extending those currently in use. The inclusion of default knowledge is necessary in order to ensure interoperability between ontologies.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implicit Knowledge Discovery in Biomedical Ontologies: Computing Interesting Relatednesses
    Bai, Tian
    Gong, Leiguang
    Kulikowski, Casimir A.
    Huang, Lan
    PROCEEDINGS 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE, 2015, : 497 - 502
  • [22] Knowledge Platform to use BioMedical Semantic WEBs individually: Bridging Gene Ontologies and Clinical Ontologies at individual site
    Nakaya, Jun
    Shimizu, Tetsuo
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2006, 6 (2A): : 1 - 9
  • [23] The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration
    Barry Smith
    Michael Ashburner
    Cornelius Rosse
    Jonathan Bard
    William Bug
    Werner Ceusters
    Louis J Goldberg
    Karen Eilbeck
    Amelia Ireland
    Christopher J Mungall
    Neocles Leontis
    Philippe Rocca-Serra
    Alan Ruttenberg
    Susanna-Assunta Sansone
    Richard H Scheuermann
    Nigam Shah
    Patricia L Whetzel
    Suzanna Lewis
    Nature Biotechnology, 2007, 25 : 1251 - 1255
  • [24] Multi-level conceptual modeling for biomedical data and ontologies integration
    Elmasri, Ramez
    Fu, Jack
    Ji, Feng
    TWENTIETH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-BASED MEDICAL SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 589 - +
  • [25] The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration
    Smith, Barry
    Ashburner, Michael
    Rosse, Cornelius
    Bard, Jonathan
    Bug, William
    Ceusters, Werner
    Goldberg, Louis J.
    Eilbeck, Karen
    Ireland, Amelia
    Mungall, Christopher J.
    Leontis, Neocles
    Rocca-Serra, Philippe
    Ruttenberg, Alan
    Sansone, Susanna-Assunta
    Scheuermann, Richard H.
    Shah, Nigam
    Whetzel, Patricia L.
    Lewis, Suzanna
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2007, 25 (11) : 1251 - 1255
  • [26] Automatic generation of integration and preprocessing ontologies for biomedical sources in a distributed scenario
    Anguita, Alberto
    Perez-Rey, David
    Crespo, Jose
    Maojo, Victor
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-BASED MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2008, : 336 - 341
  • [27] Interdisciplinary perspectives on the development, integration, and application of cognitive ontologies
    Hastings, Janna
    Frishkoff, Gwen A.
    Smith, Barry
    Jensen, Mark
    Poldrack, Russell A.
    Lomax, Jane
    Bandrowski, Anita
    Imam, Fahim
    Turner, Jessica A.
    Martone, Maryann E.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS, 2014, 8
  • [28] Knowledge Modelling and Fuzzy Ontologies Integration for Classical and Industrial Archaeologies
    Cui, Cassia De Lian
    Simeone, Davide
    Cursi, Stefano
    Fioravanti, Antonio
    Curra, Edoardo
    ECAADE 2023 DIGITAL DESIGN RECONSIDERED, VOL 1, 2023, : 861 - 870
  • [29] Knowledge Zone: A Public Repository of Peer-Reviewed Biomedical Ontologies
    Supekar, Kaustubh
    Rubin, Daniel
    Noy, Natasha
    Musen, Mark
    MEDINFO 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH WORLD CONGRESS ON HEALTH (MEDICAL) INFORMATICS, PTS 1 AND 2: BUILDING SUSTAINABLE HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2007, 129 : 812 - +
  • [30] Using ontologies to improve knowledge integration in Software Engineering Environments
    Falbo, RD
    de Menezes, CS
    da Rocha, ARC
    WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS: ISAS '98, 1998, : 296 - 303