The role of public participation in public health initiatives: An analysis of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

被引:5
|
作者
Montini, T. [1 ]
George, A. [2 ]
Martin-Mollard, M. [3 ]
Bero, L. A. [4 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Coll Nursing, New York, NY USA
[2] CIRA, Project Parivartan, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India
[3] San Jose State Univ, Sch Social Work, San Jose, CA 95192 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Pharm, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
public participation; NGO advocacy; tobacco control; POLICY; PRIORITIES;
D O I
10.1080/17441690802164391
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This is a content analysis of 489 written documents and 142 hearing testimonies, submitted to the World Health Organisation (WHO), regarding the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) during the comment period of 2000. Our aim was to consider the benefits and limitations of inviting public participation. We found that, overall, those who offered commentary were in support of the FCTC and any ensuing treaty, especially if it protected children. The minority who opposed the treaty argued that restrictions on tobacco trade would further damage the economies of poor nations that are financially dependent upon tobacco. The FCTC that was adopted at the World Health Assembly in May 2003 addressed many of the concerns raised by the public in written commentary and hearing testimony: children and youth; advertising and sponsorship; tobacco product labelling; second-hand smoke; taxes; smuggling; liability; tobacco product regulation; and the involvement of non-government organisations (NGOs). We conclude that the benefits of public participation in public health policy formation are numerous, including levelling the playing field for public health activists and NGOs, building the expertise of advocates that can be generalised to other public health efforts, giving the political process legitimacy and credibility, as well as coalition building and grassroots momentum.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 61
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
    DeVita, VT
    [J]. NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2005, 2 (04): : 171 - 171
  • [32] The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
    Braillon, Alain
    [J]. LANCET, 2016, 387 (10031): : 1907 - 1907
  • [33] The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
    Salgado, RV
    [J]. SALUD PUBLICA DE MEXICO, 2003, 45 (03): : 153 - 154
  • [34] Framework convention on tobacco control
    Slater, EE
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (07): : 537 - 537
  • [35] The framework convention on tobacco control
    Corrêa, LFD
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2002, 80 (12) : 924 - 924
  • [36] Public health initiatives
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2007, 107 (10) : 1720 - 1720
  • [37] WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: adherence and establishment in Latin America
    Portes, Leonardo Henriques
    Machado, Cristiani Vieira
    [J]. REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 38 (05): : 370 - 379
  • [38] The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control - time for a civil society equivalent?
    Daube, Mike
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2020, 30 (03):
  • [39] Smokeless Tobacco Supply Chain in South Asia: A Comparative Analysis Using the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
    Siddiqi, Kamran
    Scammell, Katy
    Huque, Rumana
    Khan, Amina
    Baral, Sushil
    Ali, Shehzad
    Watt, Ian
    [J]. NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (04) : 424 - 430
  • [40] WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in China: barriers, challenges and recommendations
    Hu, Teh-Wei
    Lee, Anita H.
    Mao, Zhengzhong
    [J]. GLOBAL HEALTH PROMOTION, 2013, 20 (04) : 13 - 22