FAMCDM: A fusion approach of MCDM methods to rank multiclass classification algorithms

被引:174
|
作者
Peng, Yi [1 ]
Kou, Gang [1 ]
Wang, Guoxun [1 ]
Shi, Yong [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Management & Econ, Chengdu 610054, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Nebraska, Coll Informat Sci & Technol, Omaha, NE 68182 USA
[3] CAS Res Ctr Fictitious Econ & Data Sci, Beijing 100080, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multicriteria; Decision making; Ranking; Multiclass classification; TOPSIS; VIKOR; PROMETHEE; WSM; DECISION-MAKING; CRITERIA; TOPSIS; OPTIMALITY; FRAMEWORK; BANKS; VIKOR; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2011.01.009
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Various methods and algorithms have been developed for multiclass classification problems in recent years. How to select an effective algorithm for a multiclass classification task is an important yet difficult issue. Since the multiclass algorithm selection normally involves more than one criterion, such as accuracy and computation time, the selection process can be modeled as a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problem. While the evaluations of algorithms provided by different MCDM methods are in agreement sometimes, there are situations where MCDM methods generate very different results. To resolve this disagreement and help decision makers pick the most suitable classifier(s), this paper proposes a fusion approach to produce a weighted compatible MCDM ranking of multiclass classification algorithms. Several multiclass datasets from different domains are used in the experimental study to test the proposed fusion approach. The results prove that MCDM methods are useful tools for evaluating multiclass classification algorithms and the fusion approach is capable of identifying a compromised solution when different MCDM methods generate conflicting rankings. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 689
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Rankıng Districts of Çanakkale in Terms of Rangeland Quality by Fuzzy MCDM Methods
    Zeynep Gökkuş
    Sevil Şentürk
    Fırat Alatürk
    Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 2023, 28 : 636 - 663
  • [32] Evaluation of an automatic dry eye test using MCDM methods and rank correlation
    Peteiro-Barral, Diego
    Remeseiro, Beatriz
    Mendez, Rebeca
    Penedo, Manuel G.
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2017, 55 (04) : 527 - 536
  • [33] Evaluation of an automatic dry eye test using MCDM methods and rank correlation
    Diego Peteiro-Barral
    Beatriz Remeseiro
    Rebeca Méndez
    Manuel G. Penedo
    Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2017, 55 : 527 - 536
  • [34] Early Classification of Time Series: Cost-based multiclass Algorithms
    Zafar, Paul-Emile
    Achenchabe, Youssef
    Bondu, Alexis
    Cornuejols, Antoine
    Lemaire, Vincent
    2021 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE AND ADVANCED ANALYTICS (DSAA), 2021,
  • [35] Multiclass Classification of EEG Signal Using a Probabilistic Approach
    Venate, Salini
    Sunny, T. D.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TRENDS IN ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICETEST - 2015), 2016, 24 : 1002 - 1007
  • [36] Multiclass genetic programming based approach for classification of intrusions
    Gp, Sunitha
    D'Souza, Rio
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED AND THEORETICAL COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICATCCT), 2017, : 74 - 78
  • [38] A GP Based Approach to the Classification of Multiclass Microarray Datasets
    Xu, Chun-Gui
    Liu, Kun-Hong
    ADVANCED INTELLIGENT COMPUTING THEORIES AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS: WITH ASPECTS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2008, 5227 : 340 - 346
  • [39] Evaluation of clustering algorithms for financial risk analysis using MCDM methods
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    Wang, Guoxun
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 275 : 1 - 12
  • [40] An Advance Boosting Approach for Multiclass Dry Bean Classification
    Nayak J.
    Dash P.B.
    Naik B.
    Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 2023, 16 (02) : 107 - 115