Architectural vs. structural constraints in urban multi-hazard safety assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Georgescu, E. [1 ]
Gociman, C. [2 ]
Craifaleanu, I [3 ,4 ]
Florescu, T. [2 ]
Georgescu, M. [2 ]
Moscu, C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Res & Dev URBAN INCERC, Bucharest, Romania
[2] Ion Mincu Univ Architecture & Urban Planning, Bucharest, Romania
[3] Tech Univ Civil Engn Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
[4] NIRD URBAN INCERC, Bucharest, Romania
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The Romanian great Vrancea earthquakes and other hazards affect large areas where heritage buildings and communities are at risk. Although the legal and technical framework exists since over a decade, the damage extent and the life safety of communities to multiple threats are not evaluated, as large data bases, sophisticated software and budgets are required. The lack of interdisciplinary university curricula and of simplified risk assessment methods, to be jointly understood and applied by architects, urban planners and structural engineers, as well as by authorities and citizens, represent additional critical constraints. The necessary approaches are at the borderline between architecture, urban planning and structural or earthquake engineering. The study of a protected area in Bucharest, presented in the paper, aims to ensure a secure habitat patrimony, using a multi-criteria evaluation of: cultural identity and functional value of buildings and materials, exposure to multiple hazards, vulnerability assessment and mapping, for alternative impact scenarios, using current data.
引用
收藏
页码:1302 / 1309
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Urban Resources Selection and Allocation for Emergency Shelters: In a Multi-Hazard Environment
    Chen, Wei
    Zhai, Guofang
    Ren, Chongqiang
    Shi, Yijun
    Zhang, Jianxin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (06):
  • [42] Post-Mining Multi-Hazard Assessment for Sustainable Development
    Al Heib, Mohamed Marwan
    Franck, Christian
    Djizanne, Hippolyte
    Degas, Marie
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [43] Quantitative multi-hazard risk assessment with vulnerability surface and hazard joint return period
    Ming, Xiaodong
    Xu, Wei
    Li, Ying
    Du, Juan
    Liu, Baoyin
    Shi, Peijun
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2015, 29 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [44] Toward a framework for systemic multi-hazard and multi-risk assessment and management
    Hochrainer-Stigler, Stefan
    Trogrlic, Robert Sakic
    Reiter, Karina
    Ward, Philip J.
    de Ruiter, Marleen C.
    Duncan, Melanie J.
    Torresan, Silvia
    Ciurean, Roxana
    Mysiak, Jaroslav
    Stuparu, Dana
    Gottardo, Stefania
    ISCIENCE, 2023, 26 (05)
  • [45] Quantitative multi-hazard risk assessment with vulnerability surface and hazard joint return period
    Xiaodong Ming
    Wei Xu
    Ying Li
    Juan Du
    Baoyin Liu
    Peijun Shi
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2015, 29 : 35 - 44
  • [46] The Coastal Hazard Wheel system for coastal multi-hazard assessment & management in a changing climate
    Lars Rosendahl Appelquist
    Kirsten Halsnæs
    Journal of Coastal Conservation, 2015, 19 : 157 - 179
  • [47] Mountain specific multi-hazard risk management framework (MSMRMF): Assessment and mitigation of multi-hazard and climate change risk in the Indian Himalayan Region
    Sekhri, Simran
    Kumar, Praveen
    Fuerst, Christine
    Pandey, Rajiv
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 118
  • [48] The Coastal Hazard Wheel system for coastal multi-hazard assessment & management in a changing climate
    Appelquist, Lars Rosendahl
    Halsnaes, Kirsten
    JOURNAL OF COASTAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 19 (02) : 157 - 179
  • [49] Multi-hazard stochastic response assessment of base-isolated buildings
    Zelleke, Daniel H.
    Matsagar, Vasant A.
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2024, 20 (03) : 301 - 325
  • [50] Life-cycle multi-hazard risk assessment of highway bridges
    Dong, Y.
    Frangopol, D. M.
    MAINTENANCE, MONITORING, SAFETY, RISK AND RESILIENCE OF BRIDGES AND BRIDGE NETWORKS, 2016, : 147 - 147