Tumour burden and efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors

被引:185
|
作者
Dall'Olio, Filippo G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Marabelle, Aurelien [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Caramella, Caroline [7 ]
Garcia, Camilo [8 ,9 ]
Aldea, Mihaela [1 ]
Chaput, Nathalie [10 ,11 ]
Robert, Caroline [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Besse, Benjamin [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Gustave Roussy, Dept Canc Med, Villejuif, France
[2] IRCCS Azienda Osped Univ Bologna, Div Med Oncol, Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Specialized Expt & Diagnost Med, Bologna, Italy
[4] Gustave Roussy, Drug Dev Dept, Villejuif, France
[5] Univ Paris Saclay, Fac Med, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[6] Gustave Roussy, INSERM, Villejuif, France
[7] Hop Marie Lannelongue, Dept Radiol, Le Plessis Robinson, France
[8] Inst Gustave Roussy, Dept Nucl Med & Endocrine Oncol, Villejuif, France
[9] Univ Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
[10] Gustave Roussy, Lab Immunomonitoring Oncol, Villejuif, France
[11] Univ Paris Saclay, Fac Pharm, Chatenay Malabry, France
关键词
T-CELL EXHAUSTION; LACTATE-DEHYDROGENASE LDH; LUNG-CANCER PATIENTS; SERUM INTERLEUKIN-8; TREATMENT RESPONSE; MELANOMA PATIENTS; LYMPHOCYTE RATIO; CLINICAL BENEFIT; MEK INHIBITION; PD-1; BLOCKADE;
D O I
10.1038/s41571-021-00564-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A high tumour burden has long been associated with inferior outcomes on traditional cancer therapies and emerging evidence suggests that tumour burden is particularly relevant for patients receiving immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Here, the authors summarize the available clinical and preclinical evidence for the role of tumour burden in determining the outcomes of patients receiving immune-checkpoint inhibitors and highlight areas that are likely to be of future research interest in this emerging area. Accumulating evidence suggests that a high tumour burden has a negative effect on anticancer immunity. The concept of tumour burden, simply defined as the total amount of cancer in the body, in contrast to molecular tumour burden, is often poorly understood by the wider medical community; nonetheless, a possible role exists in defining the optimal treatment strategy for many patients. Historically, tumour burden has been assessed using imaging. In particular, CT scans have been used to evaluate both the number and size of metastases as well as the number of organs involved. These methods are now often complemented by metabolic tumour burden, measured using the more recently developed 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]-fluoro-d-glucose (FDG)-PET/CT. Serum-based biomarkers, such as lactate dehydrogenase, can also reflect tumour burden and are often also correlated with a poor response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Other circulating markers (such as circulating free tumour DNA and/or circulating tumour cells) are also attracting research interest as surrogate markers of tumour burden. In this Review, we summarize evidence supporting the utility of tumour burden as a biomarker to guide the use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors. We also describe data and provide perspective on the various tools used for tumour burden assessment, with a particular emphasis on future therapeutic strategies that might address the issue of inferior outcomes among patients with cancer with a high tumour burden.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 90
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gastrointestinal Adverse Events Induced by Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors
    Yanai, Shunichi
    Toya, Yosuke
    Sugai, Tamotsu
    Matsumoto, Takayuki
    DIGESTION, 2021, 102 (06) : 965 - 973
  • [32] Neuro-ophthalmic Complications of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors
    Mukharesh, Loulwah
    Chwalisz, Bart K.
    SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 36 (04) : 241 - 249
  • [33] Economic sustainability of immune-checkpoint inhibitors: the looming threat
    Vivek Verma
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2018, 15 : 721 - 722
  • [34] Diabetes therapy burden as proxy of impairment of immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy
    Cortellini, A.
    Mallardo, D.
    Cleary, S.
    Bersanelli, M.
    Santini, D.
    Tucci, M. G.
    Russo, A.
    Rastelli, F.
    Filetti, M.
    Gelibter, A. J.
    Marconcini, R.
    Chiari, R.
    Grossi, F.
    De Tursi, M.
    Queirolo, P.
    Zoratto, F.
    Tanda, E. T.
    Porzio, G.
    Ascierto, P. A.
    Pinato, D. J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S834 - S834
  • [35] Are immune-checkpoint inhibitors immunosuppressive to hepatitis B virus?
    Lau, George
    Yu, Ming-Lung
    Wong, Grace
    Thompson, Alexander
    HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 16 (02) : 482 - 483
  • [36] A reality check of the accelerated approval of immune-checkpoint inhibitors
    Gill, Jennifer
    Prasad, Vinay
    NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 16 (11) : 656 - 658
  • [37] PREDICTIVE BIOMARKERS FOR IMMUNE-CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS: LOST OR FOUND?
    Penault-Llorca, Frederique
    BREAST, 2021, 59 : S27 - S28
  • [38] Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes in the era of immune-checkpoint inhibitors
    Francesc Graus
    Josep Dalmau
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2019, 16 : 535 - 548
  • [39] Autoantibody Development under Treatment with Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors
    de Moel, Emma C.
    Rozeman, Elisa A.
    Kapiteijn, Ellen H.
    Verdegaal, Els M. E.
    Grummels, Annette
    Bakker, Jaap A.
    Huizinga, Tom W. J.
    Haanen, John B.
    Toes, Rene E. M.
    van der Woude, Diane
    CANCER IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2019, 7 (01) : 6 - 11
  • [40] Incorporating Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors into Systemic Therapy of NSCLC
    Champiat, Stephane
    Ileana, Ecaterina
    Giaccone, Giuseppe
    Besse, Benjamin
    Mountzios, Giannis
    Eggermont, Alexander
    Soria, Jean-Charles
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9 (02) : 144 - 153