Combined ureterorenoscopy and shockwave lithotripsy for large renal stone burden: An alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

被引:17
|
作者
Hafron, J [1 ]
Fogarty, JD [1 ]
Boczko, J [1 ]
Hoenig, DM [1 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2005.19.464
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the feasibility and initial outcomes of a combination of ureterorenoscopy (URS) using holmium laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWIL) in a single outpatient session for the treatment of large renal stone burdens in patients refusing or unsuitable for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Patients and Methods: Fourteen patients with a mean age of 52.7 years (range 34-81 years) having a mean stone burden of 847 mm 2 (range 58 mm(2)-1850 mm(2)) were treated with combined URS laser lithotripsy and SWL as an alternative to PCNL. The SWL (mean 2800 shockwaves) was performed using the Storz Modulith SL-X, and flexible URS with holmium laser lithotripsy was performed either during or following SWL. Results: Ninety-three percent of the patients (13/14) were treated successfully on an outpatient basis. Two patients were rendered stone free after the initial procedure alone (14%). Overall, including secondary outpatient treatment with a second session of URS alone (N = 7) URS and SWL (N = 1), SWL (N = 1), or oral alkalinization therapy (N = 1), the stone-free rate was 76.9% (10113). One patient was excluded secondary to death from unrelated causes after the initial procedure, and the success rate (residual fragments < 4 mm) was 84.6% (11/13). The two treatment failures included one patient who required a third URS procedure and one patient who developed urosepsis necessitating nephrostomy-tube placement who underwent subsequent PCNL. Conclusions: In comparison with traditional approaches using PCNL and second-look nephroscopy, single-session combined URS and SWL with a second outpatient procedure may offer equivalent results with decreased morbidity in carefully selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 468
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones
    Resorlu, Berkan
    Unsal, Ali
    Ziypak, Tevfik
    Diri, Akif
    Atis, Gokhan
    Guven, Selcuk
    Sancaktutar, Ahmet Ali
    Tepeler, Abdulkadir
    Bozkurt, Omer Faruk
    Oztuna, Derya
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 31 (06) : 1581 - 1586
  • [42] Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treating a 20-30 mm single renal pelvic stone (vol 13, pg 212, 2015)
    Hassan, Mohammed
    El-Nahas, Ahmed R.
    Sheir, Khaled Z.
    El-Tabey, Nasr A.
    El-Assmy, Ahmed M.
    Elshal, Ahmed M.
    Shokeir, Ahmed A.
    ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 14 (01) : 73 - 73
  • [43] Simultaneous ureteroscopic lithotripsy and contralateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy for ureteral calculi combined with renal staghorn calculi
    Shen, Peng Fei
    Liu, Nian
    Wei, Wu Ran
    Xu, Peng
    Li, Si
    Luo, Yu Hui
    Zhao, Tao
    Zhang, Xing Ming
    Zeng, Hao
    Wang, Jia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 22 (10) : 943 - 948
  • [44] Is there a difference between presence of single stone and multiple stones in flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy for renal stone burden <300mm2 ?
    Ozgor, Faruk
    Kucuktopcu, Onur
    Ucpinar, Burak
    Gurbuz, Zafer Gokhan
    Sarilar, Omer
    Berberoglu, Ahmet Yalcin
    Baykal, Murat
    Binbay, Murat
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2016, 42 (06): : 1168 - 1177
  • [45] Lower-pole caliceal stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and flexible ureteroscopy: Impact of radiographic spatial anatomy
    Elbahnasy, AM
    Clayman, RV
    Shalhav, AL
    Hoenig, DM
    Chandhoke, P
    Lingeman, JE
    Denstedt, JD
    Kahn, R
    Assimos, DG
    Nakada, SY
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1998, 12 (02) : 113 - 119
  • [46] EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY MONOTHERAPY FOR LARGE RENAL CALCULI
    GLEESON, MJ
    GRIFFITH, DP
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 64 (04): : 329 - 332
  • [47] Flexible Ureterorenoscopy versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Stones
    Ergin, Giray
    Kirac, Mustafa
    Kopru, Burak
    Ebiloglu, Turgay
    Biri, Hasan
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 15 (06) : 313 - 317
  • [48] The Effects of Hydronephrosis and Stone Burden on Success Rates of Shockwave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Population
    Turunc, Tahsin
    Gonen, Murat
    Kuzgunbay, Baris
    Bilgilisoy, Ugur Taylan
    Dirim, Ayhan
    Tekin, Mehmet Ilteris
    Ozkardes, Hakan
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (06) : 1037 - 1041
  • [49] INTERLEUKINE-6 AND C-REACTIVE PROTEIN AS MARKERS FOR INTERVENTIONAL STRESS IN RENAL STONE TREATMENT - A COMPARISON BETWEEN EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY, URETERORENOSCOPY AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOLAPAXY
    Bedke, Jens
    Nagele, Udo
    Sonnleithner, Markus
    Hennenlotter, Joerg
    Kruck, Stephan
    Horstmann, Marcus
    Hruby, Stefan
    Hoeltl, Wolfgang
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 581 - 581
  • [50] Re: Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, Shockwave Lithotripsy, and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Medium-Sized Radiolucent Renal Stones
    Assimos, Dean G.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (01): : 157 - 157