Combined ureterorenoscopy and shockwave lithotripsy for large renal stone burden: An alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

被引:17
|
作者
Hafron, J [1 ]
Fogarty, JD [1 ]
Boczko, J [1 ]
Hoenig, DM [1 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2005.19.464
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the feasibility and initial outcomes of a combination of ureterorenoscopy (URS) using holmium laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWIL) in a single outpatient session for the treatment of large renal stone burdens in patients refusing or unsuitable for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Patients and Methods: Fourteen patients with a mean age of 52.7 years (range 34-81 years) having a mean stone burden of 847 mm 2 (range 58 mm(2)-1850 mm(2)) were treated with combined URS laser lithotripsy and SWL as an alternative to PCNL. The SWL (mean 2800 shockwaves) was performed using the Storz Modulith SL-X, and flexible URS with holmium laser lithotripsy was performed either during or following SWL. Results: Ninety-three percent of the patients (13/14) were treated successfully on an outpatient basis. Two patients were rendered stone free after the initial procedure alone (14%). Overall, including secondary outpatient treatment with a second session of URS alone (N = 7) URS and SWL (N = 1), SWL (N = 1), or oral alkalinization therapy (N = 1), the stone-free rate was 76.9% (10113). One patient was excluded secondary to death from unrelated causes after the initial procedure, and the success rate (residual fragments < 4 mm) was 84.6% (11/13). The two treatment failures included one patient who required a third URS procedure and one patient who developed urosepsis necessitating nephrostomy-tube placement who underwent subsequent PCNL. Conclusions: In comparison with traditional approaches using PCNL and second-look nephroscopy, single-session combined URS and SWL with a second outpatient procedure may offer equivalent results with decreased morbidity in carefully selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 468
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] SYMPTOMATIC STONE RECURRENCE FOLLOWING URETEROSCOPY, PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY, AND SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    Hubanks, John
    Rangel, Laureano
    Krambeck, Amy
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E620 - E621
  • [3] Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stone less than 25 mm in pediatric patients: Could it be an alternative to shockwave lithotripsy?
    Sarica, K.
    Eryildirim, B.
    Tuerxun, A.
    Batuer, A.
    Kavukoglu, O.
    Buz, A.
    Zeng, G.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2018, 42 (06): : 406 - 413
  • [4] Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy
    Stephan Kruck
    Aristoteles G. Anastasiadis
    Thomas R. W. Herrmann
    Ute Walcher
    Mohamed F. Abdelhafez
    André P. Nicklas
    Lillian Hölzle
    David Schilling
    Jens Bedke
    Arnulf Stenzl
    Udo Nagele
    World Journal of Urology, 2013, 31 : 1555 - 1561
  • [5] Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy
    Kruck, Stephan
    Anastasiadis, Aristoteles G.
    Herrmann, Thomas R. W.
    Walcher, Ute
    Abdelhafez, Mohamed F.
    Nicklas, Andre P.
    Hoelzle, Lillian
    Schilling, David
    Bedke, Jens
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Nagele, Udo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 31 (06) : 1555 - 1561
  • [6] Alkaline citrate reduces stone recurrence and regrowth after shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Lojanapiwat, B.
    Tanthanuch, M.
    Pripathanont, C.
    Ratchanon, S.
    Srinualnad, S.
    Taweemonkongsap, T.
    Kanyok, S.
    Lammongkolkul, S.
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2011, 37 (05): : 611 - 616
  • [7] Punctures versus shocks: a comparison of renal functional and structural changes after percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shockwave lithotripsy for solitary renal stone
    Shrivastava, Nitin
    Nayak, Brusabhanu
    Singh, Prabhjot
    Dogra, Prem N.
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Khan, Maroof A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2020, 13 (04) : 254 - 260
  • [8] The optimal treatment for 1-2 cm renal stones: randomised trial of percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus ureterorenoscopy versus shockwave lithotripsy
    Hong, M.
    Paul, E.
    Berman, I.
    Shahbaz, S.
    Mccahy, P.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 : 57 - 58
  • [9] Flexible ureterorenoscopy vs percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stone management: Retrospective study
    Palmero, X.
    Balssa, L.
    Bernardini, S.
    Chabannes, E.
    Guichard, G.
    Bittard, H.
    Kleinclauss, F.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2016, 26 (09): : 500 - 506
  • [10] Re: Alkaline Citrate Reduces Stone Recurrence and Regrowth After Shockwave Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
    Tiselius, Hans-Goran
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (06) : 1264 - 1264