The effect of nursing on the cow-calf bond

被引:58
|
作者
Johnsen, Julie Foske [1 ]
de Passille, Anne Marie [2 ]
Mejdell, Cecilie Marie [1 ]
Boe, Knut Egil [3 ]
Grondahl, Ann Margaret [1 ]
Beaver, Annabelle [2 ]
Rushen, Jeffrey [2 ]
Weary, Daniel M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Vet Inst, Dept Hlth Surveillance, N-0106 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ British Columbia, Fac Land & Food Syst, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[3] Univ Life Sci, Inst Anim & Aquacultural Sci, N-1432 As, Norway
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Maternal bond; Dam rearing; Animal welfare; Dairy; Growth; DAIRY CALVES; SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR; EARLY SEPARATION; MILK; MOTHER; CATTLE; CONTACT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2014.12.003
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Dairy calves are often separated from the cow soon after birth and prevented from nursing, but little is known about the effects of nursing on the development of the cow-calf bond. This study evaluated the effect of nursing on affiliative behaviours between the darn and her calf including allogrooming, proximity and latency to reunite after a period of separation. Holstein cow-calf pairs were randomly allocated to three treatments differing only in nutritional dependency on the dam: milk feeder (n = 10 pairs), combined (n=10 pairs) or nursing (n = 10 pairs). Milk feeder calves could feed ad libitum from an automated milk-feeder, combined calves could suckle from their dams at night and could feed ad libitum from an automated milk feeder and nursing calves could suckle from their dams at night. Cows and calves were kept together during the night (between 20:00 h and 08:00 h) and were housed adjacent to each other during the day (between 08:00 h and 20:00 h). Direct live observations were performed 2 h following the opening of the gate that allowed calves to mix with cows at night. All pairs spent more time (% of observations) allogrooming each other (i.e. own cow/calf) than they did grooming other cows and calves within the same group (10 +/- 0.8% vs. 0.4 +/- 0.7%, t(29) = 168.8, P < 0.001). The time cow-calf pairs spent allogrooming did not vary with treatment; 10.0 +/- 0.8%, F-2,F- 27 = 0.4,P = 0.696). Similarly, time spent in close proximity without nursing did not differ among treatments; 31 +/- 2.6%, F-2,F-27 = 0.6, P = 0.543). The percentage of occasions a pair did not reunite (i.e. not observed within 1 m of each other within 3 min) was 23% for the milk feeder pairs, 38% for the combined pairs and 32% for the nursing pairs (chi(2) =3.9, P=0.415). Nevertheless suckling from another cow than own dam was observed at least once by 19 of the 20 calves that were allowed to suckle. Latency to reunite (among pairs that did so within 180 s) was highest for the combined pairs and tended to be lower for milk feeder and nursing calves; 52.5 +/- 16.0, 23.3 +/- 8.3 and 12.9 +/- 5.8; F-2,F- 24 = 3.1, P = 0.062). These results indicate that dam and calf form a bond independent of nursing. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 57
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modelling the Dynamics of Cow-Calf Dyadic Behavior
    de Toledo, Luciandra Macedo
    Fernandes, Thayna Barcelos
    Rodrigues Paranhos da Costa, Mateus Jose
    Ambrosio, Luis Alberto
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM DYNAMICS APPLICATIONS, 2018, 7 (04) : 1 - 19
  • [32] ORCHARDGRASS VS FESCUE FOR COW-CALF PRODUCTION
    GARRIGUS, RR
    FOUTCH, HW
    BIGGER, TC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1975, 40 (01) : 182 - 182
  • [33] Feed technologies and efficiency in cow-calf systems
    da Rosa, Yago Machado
    Zago, Daniele
    de Oliveira, Tamara Esteves
    Camargo, Vinicius de Anhaia
    Jardim Barcellos, Julio Otavio
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 51
  • [34] ARTHROGRYPOSIS IN A COW-CALF - A CASE-REPORT
    RAO, VN
    SINGH, M
    GUPTA, SK
    [J]. INDIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1994, 71 (08): : 846 - 847
  • [35] BEEF COW-CALF ORGANIC PRODUCTION SYSTEM
    Claudio Rojas, G.
    Adrian Catrileo, S.
    [J]. CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2012, 28 (02) : 99 - 108
  • [36] 1978 DAIRY AND COW-CALF RECORD ANALYSES
    WALKER, HW
    [J]. VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE EXTENSION SERVICE-VIRGINIA AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1979, (305): : 1 - 2
  • [37] Biosecurity practices of beef cow-calf producers
    Sanderson, MW
    Dargatz, DA
    Garry, FB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 217 (02) : 185 - 189
  • [38] Adoption of backgrounding on cow-calf farms.
    Popp, MP
    Faminow, MD
    Parsch, LD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (05) : 1191 - 1191
  • [39] ECONOMIC-EFFICIENCY IN COW-CALF PRODUCTION
    ODDE, KG
    FIELD, TG
    [J]. AGRI-PRACTICE, 1987, 8 (06): : 28 - 32
  • [40] Antimicrobial Use in Canadian Cow-Calf Herds
    Fossen, Jayce D.
    Campbell, John R.
    Gow, Sheryl P.
    Erickson, Nathan
    Waldner, Cheryl L.
    [J]. VETERINARY SCIENCES, 2023, 10 (05)