Crown- rump length measurement error: impact on assessment of growth

被引:9
|
作者
Gadsboll, K. [1 ,2 ]
Wright, A. [3 ]
Kristensen, S. E. [1 ,2 ]
Verfaille, V. [4 ]
Nicolaides, K. H. [5 ]
Wright, D. [3 ]
Petersen, O. B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Obstet, Ctr Fetal Med Pregnancy & Ultrasound, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Exeter, Inst Hlth Res, Exeter, Devon, England
[4] Ultrasound Clin BovenMaas, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Kings Coll Hosp London, Harris Birthright Res Ctr Fetal Med, London, England
关键词
crown; rump length; estimated fetal weight; growth scan; large-for-gestational age; measurement error; small-for-gestational age; LAST MENSTRUAL PERIOD; NUCHAL-TRANSLUCENCY THICKNESS; GESTATIONAL-AGE; MATERNAL AGE; BETA-HCG; ULTRASOUND; RESTRICTION; DELIVERY; FETUSES; TRISOMY-21;
D O I
10.1002/uog.23690
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To examine the impact of first-trimester crown- rump length (CRL) measurement error on the interpretation of estimated fetal weight (EFW) and classification of fetuses as small-, large- or appropriate-for-gestational age on subsequent growth scans. Methods We examined the effects of errors of +/- 2, +/- 3 and +/- 4mm in the measurement of fetal CRL on percentiles of EFW at 20, 32 and 36weeks' gestation and classification as small-, large- or appropriate-for-gestational age. Published data on CRL measurement error were used to determine variation present in practice. Results A measurement error of -2mm in first-trimester CRL shifts an EFW on the 10th percentile at the 20-week scan to around the 20th percentile, and the effect of a CRL measurement error of + 2mm would shift an EFW on the 10th percentile to around the 5th percentile. At 32 weeks, a first-trimester CRL measurement error would shift an EFW on the 10th percentile to the 7th (+ 2 mm) or 14th (-2 mm) percentile; at 36weeks, the EFW would shift from the 10th percentile to the 8th (+ 2 mm) or 12th (-2 mm) percentile. Published data suggest that measurement errors of 2mm or more are common in practice. Conclusion Because of the widespread and potentially severe consequences of CRL measurement errors as small as 2mm on clinical assessment, patient management and research results, there is a need to increase awareness of the impact of CRL measurement error and to reduce measurement error variation through standardization and quality control. (C) 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 359
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PREDICTION OF DELIVERY DATE BY ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF FETAL CROWN-RUMP LENGTH
    DRUMM, JE
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1977, 84 (01): : 1 - 5
  • [22] ASSESSMENT OF GESTATIONAL-AGE OF THE ASIAN FETUS BY THE SONAR MEASUREMENT OF CROWN-RUMP LENGTH AND BIPARIETAL DIAMETER
    PARKER, AJ
    DAVIES, P
    NEWTON, JR
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1982, 89 (10): : 836 - 838
  • [23] THE ASSESSMENT OF GESTATIONAL-AGE OF THE ASIAN FETUS BY THE SONAR MEASUREMENT OF CROWN-RUMP LENGTH AND BIPARIETAL DIAMETER
    PARKER, AJ
    DAVIES, P
    NEWTON, JR
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1982, 55 (654): : 474 - 474
  • [24] ASSESSMENT OF PRENATAL AGE FROM CROWN-RUMP LENGTH DETERMINED ULTRASONICALLY
    DRUMM, JE
    ORAHILLY, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 1977, 148 (04): : 555 - 560
  • [25] CROWN-RUMP LENGTH MEASUREMENTS REVISITED
    KOORNSTRA, G
    WATTEL, E
    EXALTO, N
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (2-3): : 131 - 138
  • [26] DETERMINING ESOPHAGEAL LENGTH FROM CROWN-RUMP LENGTH
    PUTNAM, PE
    ORENSTEIN, SR
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1991, 29 (04) : A111 - A111
  • [27] Ultrasonographic measurement of crown-rump length in high-order multifetal pregnancies
    Saade, GR
    Gray, G
    Belfort, MA
    Carpenter, RJ
    Moise, KJ
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 11 (06) : 438 - 444
  • [28] Crown-rump length measurement: a new age for first-trimester ultrasound?
    Stirnemann, J.
    Massoud, M.
    Fries, N.
    Dumont, C.
    Haddad, G.
    Bessis, R.
    Dhombres, F.
    Salomon, L. J.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 58 (03) : 345 - 346
  • [29] ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF FETAL CROWN-RUMP LENGTH AS A METHOD OF ASSESSING GESTATIONAL AGE
    DRUMM, JE
    CLINCH, J
    MACKENZIE, G
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1976, 83 (06): : 417 - 421
  • [30] Automatic Quality Assessment of First Trimester Crown-Rump-Length Ultrasound Images
    Cengiz, Sevim
    Hamdi, Ibraheem
    Yaqub, Mohammad
    [J]. SIMPLIFYING MEDICAL ULTRASOUND, ASMUS 2022, 2022, 13565 : 172 - 182