Soil Moisture and pH Control Relative Contributions of Fungi and Bacteria to N2O Production

被引:125
|
作者
Chen, Huaihai [1 ]
Mothapo, Nape V. [1 ]
Shi, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Soil Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
NITROUS-OXIDE PRODUCTION; HETEROTROPHIC NITRIFICATION; NITRIFIER DENITRIFICATION; DENITRIFYING BACTERIA; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; FUSARIUM-OXYSPORUM; FOREST; REDUCTASE; GENE; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00248-014-0488-0
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Fungal N2O production has been progressively recognized, but its controlling factors remain unclear. This study examined the impacts of soil moisture and pH on fungal and bacterial N2O production in two ecosystems, conventional farming and plantation forestry. Four treatments, antibiotic-free soil and soil amended with streptomycin, cycloheximide, or both were used to determine N2O production of fungi versus bacteria. Soil moisture and pH effects were assessed under 65-90 % water-filled pore space (WFPS) and pH 4.0-9.0, respectively. Irrespective of antibiotic treatments, soil N2O fluxes peaked at 85-90 % WFPS and pH 7.0 or 8.0, indicating that both fungi and bacteria preferred more anoxic and neutral or slightly alkaline conditions in producing N2O. However, compared with bacteria, fungi contributed more to N2O production under sub-anoxic and acidic conditions. Real-time polymerase chain reaction of 16S, ITS rDNA, and denitrifying genes for quantifications of bacteria, fungi, and denitrifying bacteria, respectively, showed that fungi were more abundant at acidic pH, whereas total and denitrifying bacteria favored neutral conditions. Such variations in the abundance appeared to be related to the pH effects on the relative fungal and bacterial contribution to N2O production.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 191
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Production of NO, N2O and N2 by extracted soil bacteria, regulation by NO2- and O2 concentrations
    Morley, Nicholas
    Baggs, Elizabeth M.
    Dorsch, Peter
    Bakken, Lars
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 2008, 65 (01) : 102 - 112
  • [22] INFLUENCE OF PH ON THE PRODUCTION OF N2O AND N-2 BY DIFFERENT DENITRIFYING BACTERIA AND FUSARIUM-SOLANI
    BURTH, I
    OTTOW, JCG
    ECOLOGICAL BULLETINS, 1983, (35) : 207 - 215
  • [23] CONTRIBUTIONS OF AUTOTROPHIC AND HETEROTROPHIC NITRIFIERS TO SOIL NO AND N2O EMISSIONS
    TORTOSO, AC
    HUTCHINSON, GL
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1990, 56 (06) : 1799 - 1805
  • [24] Denitrification gene pools, transcription and kinetics of NO, N2O and N2 production as affected by soil pH
    Liu, Binbin
    Morkved, Pal Tore
    Frostegard, Asa
    Bakken, Lars Reier
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 2010, 72 (03) : 407 - 417
  • [25] Contributions from different microbial processes to N2O emission from soil under different moisture regimes
    Webster, EA
    Hopkins, DW
    BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1996, 22 (04) : 331 - 335
  • [26] N2O production by heterotrophic N transformations in a semiarid soil
    McLain, Jean E. T.
    Martens, Dean A.
    APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2006, 32 (02) : 253 - 263
  • [27] Disentangling gross N2O production and consumption in soil
    Wen, Yuan
    Chen, Zhe
    Dannenmann, Michael
    Carminati, Andrea
    Willibald, Georg
    Kiese, Ralf
    Wolf, Benjamin
    Veldkamp, Edzo
    Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus
    Corre, Marife D.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [28] Disentangling gross N2O production and consumption in soil
    Yuan Wen
    Zhe Chen
    Michael Dannenmann
    Andrea Carminati
    Georg Willibald
    Ralf Kiese
    Benjamin Wolf
    Edzo Veldkamp
    Klaus Butterbach-Bahl
    Marife D. Corre
    Scientific Reports, 6
  • [29] MICROBIOLOGICAL BASIS OF NO AND N2O PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION IN SOIL
    FIRESTONE, MK
    DAVIDSON, EA
    EXCHANGE OF TRACE GASES BETWEEN TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS AND THE ATMOSPHERE, 1989, 47 : 7 - 21
  • [30] Soil pH is a good predictor of the dominating N2O production processes under aerobic conditions
    Cheng, Yi
    Zhang, Jin-Bo
    Wang, Jing
    Cai, Zu-Cong
    Wang, Shen-Qiang
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2015, 178 (03) : 370 - 373