共 50 条
Benralizumab efficacy for patients with fixed airflow obstruction and severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma
被引:27
|作者:
Chipps, Bradley E.
[1
]
Hirsch, Ian
[2
]
Trudo, Frank
[3
]
Alacqua, Marianna
[4
]
Zangrilli, James G.
[2
]
机构:
[1] Capital Allergy & Resp Dis Ctr, 5609 J St,Suite C, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
[2] AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD USA
[3] AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE USA
[4] AstraZeneca, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词:
LIMITATION;
ANTIBODY;
RECEPTOR;
RISK;
D O I:
10.1016/j.anai.2019.10.006
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
Background: Fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) is associated with severe eosinophilic asthma. Benralizumab is an interleukin-5 receptor alpha-directed cytolytic monoclonal antibody for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma. Objective: We evaluated FAO influence on benralizumab treatment response. Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of pooled phase III SIROCCO (NCT01928771) and CALIMA (NCT01914757) data for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma with baseline blood eosinophil counts of 300 or more cells/mu L who received benralizumab 30 mg every 8 weeks or placebo. Demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, and treatment responses were evaluated by FAO status. FAO+ and FAO- were defined as ratios of postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity of less than 70% and 70% or more, respectively, at baseline. Results: FAO+ prevalence was 63% (935/1493). With benralizumab, similar annual asthma exacerbation rate (AER) reductions vs placebo were achieved for FAO+ and FAO- patients (rate ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.56 [0.44-0.71] and 0.58 [0.41-0.83], respectively), whereas annual AER reductions associated with emergency department visits or hospitalizations were greater for FAO+ vs FAO- patients (rate ratio [95% CI] = 0.55 [0.33-0.91] and 0.70 [0.33-1.48], respectively). Prebronchodilator FEV1 (95% CI) increase from baseline to end of treatment was greater for FAO+ vs FAO- patients receiving benralizumab compared with placebo (0.159 L [0.082-0.236] vs 0.103 L [-0.008 to 0.215]). Other lung function measures, patient-reported outcomes, and symptom improvements were also numerically greater for FAO+ vs FAO- patients. Conclusion: Benralizumab improved asthma control across several measures for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma and FAO. (C) 2019 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 86
页数:8
相关论文