Model Setting and Interpretation of Results in Research Using Structural Equation Modeling: A Checklist with Guiding Questions for Reporting

被引:90
|
作者
Kang, Hyuncheol [1 ]
Ahn, Jung-Won [2 ]
机构
[1] Hoseo Univ, Dept Big Data & AI, Asan, South Korea
[2] Chung Ang Univ, Red Cross Coll Nursing, 84 Heukseok Ro, Seoul 06974, South Korea
关键词
Factor analysis; Goodness of fit index; Latent variable; Measurement model; Structural equation model; Structural model;
D O I
10.1016/j.anr.2021.06.001
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study develops a checklist with guidelines for the methods and important factors to consider in research using structural equation modeling (SEM). Method: The paper discusses the factors to consider in the process across the three stages of 1) model setting, 2) model evaluation and modification, and 3) interpretation and reporting of SEM-based studies. Results: The authors present a checklist for researchers during the stages of model setting, model evaluation and modification, result analysis, and reporting, along with examples of figures and tables with explanations. Conclusion: A checklist will help to improve the reporting quality of SEM-based studies. (c) 2021 Korean Society of Nursing Science. Published by Elsevier BV. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 162
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Structural equation model with PLS path modeling for an integrated system of publicly funded basic research
    Jiancheng Guan
    Nan Ma
    Scientometrics, 2009, 81 : 683 - 698
  • [32] Structural equation model with PLS path modeling for an integrated system of publicly funded basic research
    Guan, Jiancheng
    Ma, Nan
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, 81 (03) : 683 - 698
  • [33] Predictive modeling in logistics and supply chain management research using partial least squares structural equation modeling
    Cheah, Jun-Hwa
    Kersten, Wolfgang
    Ringle, Christian M.
    Wallenburg, Carl
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2023, 53 (7/8) : 709 - 717
  • [34] A paired comparison test model using structural equation Modeling resistant to response bias
    Toyoda, Hideki
    Kawahashi, Ikko
    Watanabe, Tohru
    Hidaka, Mieko
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 55 (03): : 325 - 334
  • [35] Fitting Data to Model: Structural Equation Modeling Diagnosis Using Two Scatter Plots
    Yuan, Ke-Hai
    Hayashi, Kentaro
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2010, 15 (04) : 335 - 351
  • [36] Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach
    Chau, PYK
    DECISION SCIENCES, 1997, 28 (02) : 309 - 334
  • [37] An addictive disorders severity model: a chained mediation analysis using structural equation modeling
    Gori, Alessio
    Topino, Eleonora
    Cacioppo, Marco
    Craparo, Giuseppe
    Schimmenti, Adriano
    Caretti, Vincenzo
    JOURNAL OF ADDICTIVE DISEASES, 2023, 41 (01) : 98 - 109
  • [38] Development of an emotional response model for hospital gown design using structural equation modeling
    Zhao, Yu
    Zhou, Feng
    Zhao, Yan
    Zou, Yunding
    Wei, Xixi
    AUTEX RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [39] Using Phantom Variables in Structural Equation Modeling to Assess Model Sensitivity to External Misspecification
    Harring, Jeffrey R.
    McNeish, Daniel M.
    Hancock, Gregory R.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2017, 22 (04) : 616 - 631
  • [40] Validating a DEA-based menu analysis model using structural equation modeling
    Reynolds, Dennis
    Taylor, Jim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2011, 30 (03) : 584 - 587