Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

被引:73
|
作者
Nadu, A [1 ]
Salomon, L [1 ]
Hoznek, A [1 ]
Olsson, LE [1 ]
Saint, F [1 ]
de la Taille, A [1 ]
Cicco, A [1 ]
Chopin, D [1 ]
Abbou, CC [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Henri Mondor, Dept Urol, F-94010 Creteil, France
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2001年 / 166卷 / 05期
关键词
laparoscopy; prostatectomy; catheterization;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65648-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We prospectively tested the safety of routine removal of the catheter as early as 2 to 4 days after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: Between March 1998 and March 2001, 228 patients underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for clinically organ confined prostate cancer. The last 113 consecutive patients were included in a prospective study according to gravitational cystography performed 2 to 4 days postoperatively. If no leak was seen the catheter was removed. If a leak was apparent the catheter was left indwelling for another 6 days and cystography was repeated. Results: Cystography 2 to 4 days postoperatively showed an anastomosis without a leak in 96 (84.9%) patients who subsequently had the catheters removed. There were 28 patients who had the catheter removed on postoperative day 2, 28 day 3 and 40 day 4. In 17 (15.1%) patients an anastomotic leak was observed, and the catheter was not removed at that time. Of the 96 patients in whom the catheter was removed early 10 (10.4%) had urinary retention that necessitated re-catheterization. This procedure was performed without the need for cystoscopy, After the catheter was removed all patients were able to void 24 hours later. Median followup was 7 months (range 1 to 15) and showed continence rates greater than 93%. No anastomotic stricture, pelvic abscess or urinoma developed in any patient. Conclusions: Patients who undergo laparoscopic radical prostatectomy can have the catheter safely removed 2 to 4 days postoperatively without a higher risk of incontinence, stricture or leak related problems.
引用
收藏
页码:1662 / 1664
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Review of the article "Early removal of urethral catheter after endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy"
    Veliev, E. I.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2019, 15 (02): : 64 - 64
  • [12] Early Removal of Urethral Catheter with Suprapubic Tube Drainage Versus Urethral Catheter Drainage Alone after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Prasad, Sandip M.
    Large, Michael C.
    Patel, Amit R.
    Famakinwa, Olufenwa
    Galocy, R. Matthew
    Karrison, Theodore
    Shalhav, Arieh L.
    Zagaja, Gregory P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (01): : 89 - 95
  • [13] Role of Short-Term Antibiotic Therapy at the Moment of Catheter Removal after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Pinochet, Rodrigo
    Nogueira, Lucas
    Cronin, Angel M.
    Katz, Darren
    Rabbani, Farhang
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    Touijer, Karim
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2010, 85 (04) : 415 - 420
  • [14] Comparison of continence outcomes of early catheter removal on postoperative day 2 and 4 after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
    Matsushima, Masashi
    Miyajima, Akira
    Hattori, Seiya
    Takeda, Toshikazu
    Mizuno, Ryuichi
    Kikuchi, Eiji
    Oya, Mototsugu
    BMC UROLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [15] Comparison of continence outcomes of early catheter removal on postoperative day 2 and 4 after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
    Masashi Matsushima
    Akira Miyajima
    Seiya Hattori
    Toshikazu Takeda
    Ryuichi Mizuno
    Eiji Kikuchi
    Mototsugu Oya
    BMC Urology, 15
  • [16] Correlation of urine loss after catheter removal and early continence in men undergoing radical prostatectomy
    Hoeh, B.
    Wenzel, M.
    Humke, C.
    Wittler, C.
    Hohenhorst, J. L.
    Volckmann-Wilde, M.
    Koellermann, J.
    Steuber, T.
    Graefen, M.
    Derya, T.
    Karakiewicz, P.
    Becker, A.
    Kluth, L. A.
    Chun, F. K. H.
    Mandel, P.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S1670 - S1670
  • [17] Urethral mobility at catheter removal predicts early recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy
    Nishida, Sachiyo
    Utsunomiya, Noriaki
    Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
    Kamoto, Toshiyuki
    Ogawa, Osamu
    Kinoshita, Hidefumi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 16 (04) : 375 - 378
  • [18] Reply to review of the article "Early removal of urethral catheter after endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy"
    Nosov, A. K.
    Reva, S. A.
    Berkut, M. V.
    Petrov, S. B.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2019, 15 (02): : 65 - 65
  • [19] Correlation of Urine Loss after Catheter Removal and Early Continence in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
    Hoeh, Benedikt
    Preisser, Felix
    Wenzel, Mike
    Humke, Clara
    Wittler, Clarissa
    Hohenhorst, Jan L.
    Volckmann-Wilde, Maja
    Koellermann, Jens
    Steuber, Thomas
    Graefen, Markus
    Tilki, Derya
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Becker, Andreas
    Kluth, Luis A.
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Mandel, Philipp
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (06) : 4738 - 4747
  • [20] Early Removal of Urethral Catheter with Suprapubic Tube Drainage Versus Urethral Catheter Drainage Alone after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Abdollah, Firas
    Menon, Mani
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (01): : 95 - 95