Some Precambrian banded iron-formations (BIFs) from around the world: Their age, geologic setting, mineralogy, metamorphism, geochemistry, and origin

被引:704
|
作者
Klein, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2138/am.2005.1871
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Banded iron-formations (BIFs) occur in the Precambrian geologic record over a wide time span. Beginning at 3.8 Ga (Isua, West Greenland), they are part of Archean cratons and range in age from about 3.5 until 2.5 Ga. Their overall volume reaches a maximum at about 2.5 Ga (iron-formations in the Hamersley Basin of Western Australia) and they disappear from the geologic record at about 1.8 Ga, only to reappear between 0.8 and 0.6 Ga. The stratigraphic sequences in which BIFs occur are highly variable. Most Archean iron-formations are part of greenstone belts that have been deformed, metamorphosed, and dismembered. This makes reconstruction of the basinal setting of such BIFs very difficult. The general lack of metamorphism and deformation of extensive BIFs of the Hamersley Range of Western Australia and the Transvaal Supergroup of South Africa allow for much better evaluations of original basinal settings. Most Archean iron-formations show fine laminations and/or microbanding. Such microbanding is especially well developed in the Brockman Iron Formation of Western Australia, where it has been interpreted as chemical varves, or annual layers of sedimentation. BIFs ranging in age from 2.2 Ga to about 1.8 Ga (e.g., those of the Lake Superior region, U.S.A., Labrador Trough, Canada, and the Nabberu Basin of Western Australia) commonly exhibit granular textures and lack microbanding. The mineralogy of the least metamorphosed BIFs consists of combinations of the following minerals: chert, magnetite, hematite, carbonates (most commonly siderite and members of the dolomite-ankerite series), greenalite, stilpnomelane, and riebeckite, and locally pyrite. Minnesotaite is a common, very low-grade metamorphic reaction product. The Eh-pH stability fields of the above minerals (and/or their precursors) indicate anoxic conditions for the original depositional environment. The average bulk chemistry of BIFs, from 3.8 through 1.8 Ga in age, is very similar. They are rich in total Fe (ranging from about 20 to 40 wt%) and SiO2 (ranging from 43 to 56 wt%). CaO and MgO, contents range from 1.75 to 9.0 and from 1.20 to 6.7 wt%, respectively. Al2O3 contents are very low, ranging from 0.09 to 1.8 wt%. These chemical values show that they are clean chemical sediments devoid of detrital input. Only the Neoproterozoic iron-formations (of 0.8 to 0.6 Ga in age) have very different mineralogical and chemical make-ups. They consist mainly of chert and hematite, with minor carbonates. The rare-earth element profiles of almost all BIFs,with generally pronounced positive Eu anomalies, indicate that the source of Fe and Si was the result of deep ocean hydrothermal activity admixed with sea water. The prograde metamorphism of iron-formations produces sequentially Fe-amphiboles, then Fe-pyroxenes, and finally (at highest grade) Fe-olivine-containing assemblages. Such metamorphic reactions are. isochemical except for decarbonation and dehydration. The common fine lamination (and/or microbanding) as well as the lack of detrital components in most BIFs suggest that such are the result of deposition, below wave base, in the deeper parts of ocean basins. Those with granular textures are regarded as the result of deposition in shallow water, platformal areas. Carbon isotope data suggest that for a long period of time (from Archean to Early Proterozoic) the ocean basins were stratified with respect to delta C-13 (in carbonates) as well as organic carbon content. In Middle Proterozoic time (when granular BIFs appear) this stratification diminishes and is lost. The Neoproterozoic BIFs occur in stratigraphic sequences with glaciomarine deposits. These BIFs are the result of anoxic conditions that resulted from the stagnation in the oceans beneath a near-global ice cover, referred to as "Snowball Earth." All of the most "primary" mineral assemblages appear to be the result of chemical precipitation under anoxic conditions. There are, as yet, no data to support that BIF precipitation was linked directly to microbial, activity. The relative abundance of BIF throughout the Precambrian record is correlated with a possible curve for the evolution of the 02 content in the Precambrian atmosphere.
引用
收藏
页码:1473 / 1499
页数:27
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [11] Geochemistry and origin of the banded Iron formations (BIFs) from the Western Dharwar craton, southern India: Implications for evolving redox conditions of Archean oceans
    Mukherjee, Aindrila
    Mudlappa, Jayananda
    Nasipuri, Pritam
    Aadhiseshan, K. R.
    Satyanarayanan, M.
    GEOCHEMISTRY, 2025, 85 (03):
  • [12] Petrology and geochemistry of the banded iron-formations from Ntem complex greenstones belt, Elom area, Southern Cameroon: Implications for the origin and depositional environment
    Sylvestre, Ganno
    Timoleon, Ngnotue
    Djibril, Kouankap Nono Gus
    Paul, Nzenti Jean
    Marianne, Notsa Fokeng
    CHEMIE DER ERDE-GEOCHEMISTRY, 2015, 75 (03) : 375 - 387
  • [13] DISTRIBUTION AND ORIGIN OF NOBLE-GASES IN MAGNETITES FROM THE PRECAMBRIAN BANDED IRON-ORE FORMATIONS
    VERKHOVSKY, AB
    MARKOV, MS
    SHUKOLYUKOV, YA
    SHCHIPANSKY, AA
    SEMENOVA, LF
    GEOKHIMIYA, 1991, (01): : 15 - 26
  • [14] Geology and geochemical constrains on the origin and depositional setting of the Kpwa-Atog Boga banded iron formations (BIFs), northwestern Congo craton, southern Cameroon
    Tamehe, Landry Soh
    Tankwa, Marvin Nzepang
    Wei Chongtao
    Ganno, Sylvestre
    Ngnotue, Timoleon
    Nono, Gus Djibril Kouankap
    Simon, Shaamu Jeremia
    Zhang, Junjian
    Nzenti, Jean Paul
    ORE GEOLOGY REVIEWS, 2018, 95 : 620 - 638
  • [15] Petrology and geochemistry of the Palaeo-Mesoarchean Banded Iron formations (BIFs) from the central Bundelkhand greenstone belts, Bundelkhand Craton, India: Source characteristics and depositional environment
    Malviya, Vivek P.
    Arima, Makoto
    Verma, Sanjeet K.
    Pati, Jayanta
    Shareef, Mohamed
    Dora, Muduru L.
    Singh, Vinod K.
    Prakash, Satya
    Shukla, Mayank
    GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 57 (08) : 3292 - 3312
  • [16] Neoarchean Algoma-type banded iron formations from Eastern Hebei, North China Craton: SHRIMP U-Pb age, origin and tectonic setting
    Han, Chunming
    Xiao, Wenjiao
    Su, Benxun
    Chen, Zhengle
    Zhang, Xiaohui
    Ao, Songjian
    Zhang, Jien
    Zhang, Zhiyong
    Wan, Bo
    Song, Dongfang
    Wang, Zhongmei
    PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH, 2014, 251 : 212 - 231
  • [17] Interpretations and implications of LA ICP-MS analysis of chert for the origin of geochemical signatures in banded iron formations (BIFs) from the Meadowbank gold deposit, Western Churchill Province, Nunavut
    Gourcerol, B.
    Thurston, P. C.
    Kontak, D. J.
    Cote-Mantha, O.
    CHEMICAL GEOLOGY, 2015, 410 : 89 - 107
  • [18] Petrology and geochemistry of the Wangjiazhuang banded iron formation and associated supracrustal rocks from the Wutai greenstone belt in the North China Craton: Implications for their origin and tectonic setting
    Wang, Changle
    Zhang, Lianchang
    Lan, Caiyun
    Dai, Yanpei
    PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH, 2014, 255 : 603 - 626
  • [19] Source and age of the Ngaye banded iron formations, Adamawa Yade Domain, Central Cameroon: Constraints from whole-rock geochemistry and U-Pb zircon geochronology
    Mbita, Arnold Steven Motto
    Tankwa, Marvine Nzepang
    Tamehe, Landry Soh
    Fossi, Donald Hermann
    Tchoupe, Guy Bertin Takam
    Ganno, Sylvestre
    Nzenti, Jean Paul
    GEOCHEMISTRY, 2024, 84 (03):
  • [20] Formation age and tectonic setting of the Shirengou Neoarchean banded iron deposit in eastern Hebei Province: Constraints from geochemistry and SIMS zircon U-Pb dating
    Zhang, Lianchang
    Zhai, Mingguo
    Zhang, Xiaojing
    Xiang, Peng
    Dai, Yanpei
    Wang, Changle
    Pirajno, Franco
    PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH, 2012, 222 : 325 - 338