A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization

被引:845
|
作者
Burgess, Stephen [1 ]
Small, Dylan S. [2 ]
Thompson, Simon G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
英国惠康基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Instrumental variable; comparison of methods; causal inference; weak instruments; finite-sample bias; Mendelian randomization; MULTIPLE GENETIC-VARIANTS; WEAK INSTRUMENTS; CAUSAL INFERENCE; GENERALIZED-METHOD; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SAMPLE PROPERTIES; CONFIDENCE SETS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/0962280215597579
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Instrumental variable analysis is an approach for obtaining causal inferences on the effect of an exposure (risk factor) on an outcome from observational data. It has gained in popularity over the past decade with the use of genetic variants as instrumental variables, known as Mendelian randomization. An instrumental variable is associated with the exposure, but not associated with any confounder of the exposure-outcome association, nor is there any causal pathway from the instrumental variable to the outcome other than via the exposure. Under the assumption that a single instrumental variable or a set of instrumental variables for the exposure is available, the causal effect of the exposure on the outcome can be estimated. There are several methods available for instrumental variable estimation; we consider the ratio method, two-stage methods, likelihood-based methods, and semi-parametric methods. Techniques for obtaining statistical inferences and confidence intervals are presented. The statistical properties of estimates from these methods are compared, and practical advice is given about choosing a suitable analysis method. In particular, bias and coverage properties of estimators are considered, especially with weak instruments. Settings particularly relevant to Mendelian randomization are prioritized in the paper, notably the scenario of a continuous exposure and a continuous or binary outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:2333 / 2355
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficient Design for Mendelian Randomization Studies: Subsample and 2-Sample Instrumental Variable Estimators
    Pierce, Brandon L.
    Burgess, Stephen
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 178 (07) : 1177 - 1184
  • [2] EFFICIENT DESIGN FOR MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION STUDIES: SUBSAMPLE AND TWO-SAMPLE INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATORS.
    Pierce, Brandon
    Burgess, Stephen
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 177 : S117 - S117
  • [3] Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference
    Didelez, Vanessa
    Sheehan, Nuala
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (04) : 309 - 330
  • [4] Instrumental variable model average with applications in Mendelian randomization
    Seng, Loraine Liping
    Liu, Ching-Ti
    Wang, Jingli
    Li, Jialiang
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (19) : 3547 - 3567
  • [5] An adjusted instrumental-variable model for Mendelian randomization
    Palmer, T. M.
    Burton, P. R.
    Thompson, J. R.
    Tobin, M. D.
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 31 (06) : 641 - 641
  • [6] MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION: THE USE OF GENES IN INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ANALYSES
    Scholder, Stephanie von Hinke Kessler
    Smith, George Davey
    Lawlor, Debbie A.
    Propper, Carol
    Windmeijer, Frank
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2011, 20 (08) : 893 - 896
  • [7] 'Mendelian randomization' equals instrumental variable analysis with genetic instruments
    Wehby, George L.
    Ohsfeldt, Robert L.
    Murray, Jeffrey C.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (15) : 2745 - 2749
  • [8] Falsification of the instrumental variable conditions in Mendelian randomization studies in the UK Biobank
    Guo, Kelly
    Diemer, Elizabeth W.
    Labrecque, Jeremy A.
    Swanson, Sonja A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 38 (09) : 921 - 927
  • [9] Credible Mendelian Randomization Studies: Approaches for Evaluating the Instrumental Variable Assumptions
    Glymour, M. Maria
    Tchetgen, Eric J. Tchetgen
    Robins, James M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 175 (04) : 332 - 339
  • [10] Constrained Instrumental Variable Approach and its Application to Mendelian Randomization with Pleiotropy
    Jiang, Lai
    Greenwood, Celia
    Oualkacha, Karim
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 40 (07) : 615 - 616