Rapid Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping of Intracerebral Hemorrhage

被引:20
|
作者
De, Ashmita [1 ]
Sun, Hongfu [1 ]
Emery, Derek J. [2 ]
Butcher, Kenneth S. [3 ]
Wilman, Alan H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Biomed Engn, 1098 RTF, Edmonton, AB T6G 2V2, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Radiol & Diagnost Imaging, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Div Neurol, Dept Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
TISSUE; MAP;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.26850
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) offers a means to track iron evolution in hemorrhage. However, standard QSM sequences have long acquisition times and are prone to motion artifact in hemorrhagic patients. Purpose: To minimize motion artifact and acquisition time by performing rapid QSM in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) using single-shot echo planar imaging (EPI). Study Type: Prospective method evaluation. Population/Subjects: Forty-five hemorrhages were analyzed from 35 MRI exams obtained between February 2016 and March 2019 from 27 patients (14 male / 13 female, age: 71 +/- 12 years) with confirmed primary ICH. Field Strength/Sequence: 3T; susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) with 4.54-minute acquisition and 2D single-shot gradient EPI with 0.45-minute acquisition. Assessment: Susceptibility maps were constructed from both methods. Measurement of ICH area and mean magnetic susceptibility were made manually by three independent observers. Motion artifacts were quantified using the magnitude signal ratio of artifact-to-brain tissue to classify into three categories: mild or no artifact, moderate artifact, or severe artifact. The cutoff for each category was determined by four observers. Statistical Tests: Pearson's correlation coefficient and paired t-test using alpha = 0.05 were used to compare results. Inter- and intraclass correlation was used to assess observer variability. Results: Using 45 hemorrhages, the ICH regions measured on susceptibility maps obtained from EPI and SWI sequences had high correlation coefficients for area (R-2 >= 0.97) and mean magnetic susceptibility (R-2 >= 0.93) for all observers. The artifact-to-tissue ratio was significantly higher (P < 0.01) for SWI vs. EPI, and the standard deviation for the SWI method (SD = 0.05) was much larger than EPI (SD = 0.01). All observers' measurements showed high agreement. Data Conclusion: Single-shot EPI-QSM enabled rapid measurement of ICH area and mean magnetic susceptibility, with reduced motion as compared with more standard SWI. EPI-QSM requires minimal additional acquisition time and could be incorporated into iron tracking studies in ICH.
引用
收藏
页码:712 / 718
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sparse Methods for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping
    Bilgic, Berkin
    Chatnuntawech, Itthi
    Langkammer, Christian
    Setsompop, Kawin
    WAVELETS AND SPARSITY XVI, 2015, 9597
  • [42] Editorial: Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in Neurodegeneration
    Yan, Fuhua
    He, Naying
    Haacke, E. Mark
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [43] Quantitative susceptibility mapping in atypical Parkinsonisms
    Mazzucchi, Sonia
    Frosini, Daniela
    Costagli, Mauro
    Del Prete, Eleonora
    Donatelli, Graziella
    Cecchi, Paolo
    Migaleddu, Gianmichele
    Bonuccelli, Ubaldo
    Ceravolo, Roberto
    Cosottini, Mirco
    NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2019, 24
  • [44] Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in Multiple Sclerosis
    Langkammer, Christian
    Liu, Tian
    Khalil, Michael
    Enzinger, Christian
    Jehna, Margit
    Fuchs, Siegrid
    Fazekas, Franz
    Wang, Yi
    Ropele, Stefan
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 267 (02) : 551 - 559
  • [45] Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Concepts and Applications
    J. R. Reichenbach
    F. Schweser
    B. Serres
    A. Deistung
    Clinical Neuroradiology, 2015, 25 : 225 - 230
  • [46] Image Reconstruction in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping
    Natterer, Frank
    SIAM JOURNAL ON IMAGING SCIENCES, 2016, 9 (03): : 1127 - 1131
  • [47] Quantitative susceptibility mapping in multiple sclerosis
    Langkammer, C.
    Liu, T.
    Khalil, M.
    Enzinger, C.
    Jehna, M.
    Fuchs, S.
    Fazekas, F.
    Wang, Y.
    Ropele, S.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2012, 18 : 393 - 393
  • [48] Quantitative susceptibility mapping evaluation of glioma
    Shanmei Zeng
    Hui Ma
    Dingxiang Xie
    Yingqian Huang
    Mengzhu Wang
    Wenting Zeng
    Nengjin Zhu
    Zuliwei Ma
    Zhiyun Yang
    Jianping Chu
    Jing Zhao
    European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 6636 - 6647
  • [49] Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping MRI With Computer Vision Metrics to Reduce Scan Time for Brain Hemorrhage Assessment
    Huang, Huiyu
    Balaji, Shreyas
    Aslan, Bulent
    Wen, Yan
    Selim, Magdy
    Thomas, Ajith J.
    Filippidis, Aristotelis
    Spincemaille, Pascal
    Wang, Yi
    Soman, Salil
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMAGING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 35 (02)
  • [50] Autonomic Shift and Increased Susceptibility to Infections After Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    Sykora, Marek
    Diedler, Jennifer
    Poli, Sven
    Rizos, Timolaos
    Turcani, Peter
    Veltkamp, Roland
    Steiner, Thorsten
    STROKE, 2011, 42 (05) : 1218 - 1223