While emerging forward exchange markets (EMs) have been rapidly developed, market efficiency has rarely been examined for EMs. To properly test the market efficiency for EMs, we set up a simple model to account for EM-specific realistic features. Based on the new model, we develop a modified covered interest parity (CIP) condition, which features multiple neutral bands associated with both transaction costs and differential borrowing costs. In addition, we apply the notion of 'arbitrage paradox' to test market efficiency. In particular, we focus not only on the violation event of the (modified) CIP condition but also on the persistence of arbitrage opportunities. We then apply this methodology to the Korean forward exchange market and provide empirical results for the Korean market, which can also be useful for analyzing other EMs. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机构:
Fed Reserve Board, Washington, DC 20551 USAFed Reserve Board, Washington, DC 20551 USA
Du, Wenxin
Tepper, Alexander
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Columbia Grad Sch Architecture Planning & Preserv, New York, NY USA
Fed Reserve Bank New York, New York, NY 10045 USAFed Reserve Board, Washington, DC 20551 USA
Tepper, Alexander
Verdelhan, Adrien
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
MIT Sloan, Cambridge, MA USA
NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USAFed Reserve Board, Washington, DC 20551 USA
机构:
London Metropolitan Univ, Dept Econ Finance & Int Business, Ctr Int Capital Markets, London EC2M 6SQ, EnglandLondon Metropolitan Univ, Dept Econ Finance & Int Business, Ctr Int Capital Markets, London EC2M 6SQ, England
Cerrato, Mario
Sarantis, Nicholas
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
London Metropolitan Univ, Dept Econ Finance & Int Business, Ctr Int Capital Markets, London EC2M 6SQ, EnglandLondon Metropolitan Univ, Dept Econ Finance & Int Business, Ctr Int Capital Markets, London EC2M 6SQ, England