Development of electrochemical method to detect bacterial count, Listeria monocytogenes, and somatic cell count in raw milk

被引:12
|
作者
Huang, Yi-Ming [1 ]
Hsu, Hung-Yu [2 ]
Hsu, Chuan-Liang [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chin Yi Univ Technol, Dept Chem & Mat Engn, Taichung 411, Taiwan
[2] Tunghai Univ, Dept Food Sci, Taichung 407, Taiwan
关键词
Bacterial count; Listeria monocytogenes; Somatic cell count; Detection time; Lactate dehydrogenase; Mastitis; LACTATE-DEHYDROGENASE; SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS; RAPID DETECTION; BIOSENSORS; QUALITY; IDENTIFICATION; HAPTOGLOBIN; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtice.2016.01.030
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Bacterial count, Listeria monocytogenes detection and somatic cell count (SCC) are generally recognized as indexes of raw milk quality which could affect the price and the shelf-life of dairy products. This research was aimed at developing an easy, low-cost and rapid quantitative electrochemical detection method for measuring the three indexes simultaneously. Through the electrochemical sensor, bacterial count or L monocytogenes detection was determined by evaluating the electric-current originated from microbial activity. SCC was determined by measuring current signal produced by the expression of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, a biomarker also for diagnosing mastitis. The research indicated that the appropriate conditions for applying the biosensor to bacterial count detection ranging from 10(2) to 10(8) CFU/ml within detection time (DT) of 1-10 h are 35 degrees C at 1 V and that the optimal conditions for L. monocytogenes detection are 37 degrees C at 1 V, under pH 9.4, associated with a Fraser selective broth. The optimal conditions for SCC detection ranging from 350 to 780 thousand SCC/ml (R-2 = 0.907) within 60 s (DT) are 42 degrees C at 0.5 V, under pH 9.0. The biosensor is shown to be a promising approach for the detections in raw milk. (C) 2016 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 44
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Estimation of low bacterial concentration:: Listeria monocytogenes in raw milk
    Meyer-Broseta, S
    Diot, A
    Bastian, S
    Rivière, J
    Cerf, O
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 80 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [22] Proteolysis and Storage Stability of Ultra High Temperature Processed Milk as Influenced by Somatic Cell Count and Bacterial Count
    Hachana, Yasser
    Kraiem, Khemais
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2009, 36 (01) : 65 - 70
  • [23] EFFECT OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF UDDER PREPARATION ON THE SOMATIC-CELL COUNT AND BACTERIAL COUNT OF HERD BULK MILK
    CHAMINGS, RJ
    JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF DAIRY TECHNOLOGY, 1984, 37 (04): : 130 - 132
  • [24] BACTERIAL COUNT AND CELL DIFFERENTIATION IN MILK
    DUITSCHAEVER, CL
    NATURE, 1965, 208 (5006) : 200 - +
  • [25] DIRECT MICROSCOPIC SOMATIC CELL COUNT IN MILK
    不详
    JOURNAL OF MILK AND FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1968, 31 (11): : 350 - &
  • [26] A world for milk somatic cell count: Is it justified?
    Smith, KL
    Hogan, JS
    BULLETIN OF THE INTERNATIONAL DAIRY FEDERATION NO 345/1999: QUALITY AND SAFETY OF RAW MILK AND ITS IMPACT ON MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS, 1999, : 7 - 10
  • [27] Influence of somatic cell count on milk components
    Maziero Montanhini, Maike Tais
    Murara Moraes, Deborah Helena
    Neto, Roberto Montanhini
    JOURNAL OF CANDIDO TOSTES DAIRY INSTITUTE, 2013, 68 (392): : 18 - 22
  • [28] Changes on milk somatic cell count in farms
    Agabriel, C
    Coulon, JB
    Sibra, C
    Journal, C
    Hauwuy, A
    ANNALES DE ZOOTECHNIE, 1997, 46 (01): : 13 - 19
  • [29] Method development for the analysis of total bacterial count in raw milk using near-infrared spectroscopy
    Numthuam, Sonthaya
    Hongpathong, Jutaporn
    Charoensook, Rangsun
    Rungchang, Saowaluk
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SAFETY, 2017, 37 (03)
  • [30] Relationships Between Somatic Cell Count and Some Raw Milk Paramaters of Anatolian Buffaloes
    Sahin, A.
    Yildirim, A.
    Ulutas, Z.
    JOURNAL OF TEKIRDAG AGRICULTURE FACULTY-TEKIRDAG ZIRAAT FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2014, 11 (01): : 114 - 121