Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Anal Cancer: Dose-Volume Relationship of Acute Gastrointestinal Toxicity and Disease Outcomes

被引:8
|
作者
Ng, M. [1 ]
Hoy, H. [2 ]
Skelton, J. [3 ]
Guerrieri, M. [4 ]
Guiney, M. [1 ]
Chao, M. [2 ]
Blakey, D. [5 ]
Macleod, C. [6 ]
Amor, H. [3 ]
Subramanian, B. [2 ]
Melven, L. [3 ]
机构
[1] GenesisCare Radiat Oncol Ctr St Vincents, Fitzroy, Vic, Australia
[2] GenesisCare Radiat Oncol Ctr Ringwood, Ringwood, Vic, Australia
[3] GenesisCare Head Off, East Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] GenesisCare Radiat Oncol Ctr Footscray, Footscray, Vic, Australia
[5] GenesisCare Radiat Oncol Ctr Frankston, Frankston, Vic, Australia
[6] Albury Wodonga Reg Canc Ctr, GenesisCare Radiat Oncol Ctr, East Albury, NSW, Australia
关键词
Anal cancer; diarrhoea; dose-volume relationship; gastrointestinal toxicity; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; CHEMORADIATION; PREDICTORS; MITOMYCIN; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.clon.2018.07.020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is increasingly used in the treatment delivery of chemoradiotherapy in anal cancer with the ability to reduce toxicity. We report on 4 year outcomes since the introduction of IMRT and identify the most predictive bowel organ at risk that correlates with acute diarrhoea. Materials and methods: Fifty-eight patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy for squamous or basaloid cell anal carcinoma (T1-4NanyM0) were reviewed. Fifty-four per cent of patients had stage III disease and most (79%) were treated with a dose of 54 Gy in 30 fractions. Patient acute gastrointestinal toxicity was recorded using Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE) diarrhoea grading. Four different methods of bowel were re-contoured for each patient and correlated with acute diarrhoea. Locoregional control and overall survival were analysed. Results: CTCAE grade 3 or more diarrhoea occurred in 11/58 patients (19%). Seven patients did not complete treatment; 10 patients (17%) required a treatment break of 3 or more days. 'Bowel cavity' was the best predictor of acute grade 3 toxicity using volume (P = 0.002) or volume to bowel cavity in 5 Gy bins (V5-V50Gy); P < 0.05. Bowel cavity V30Gy <= 300 cm(3) predicts a 6% grade 3 diarrhoea risk versus > 300 cm(3) predicts a 42% risk. Four year progression-free survival was 84% (95% confidence interval 73-92%) and overall survival was 88% (95% confidence interval 75-95%). Conclusion: Chemoradiation using IMRT provides excellent local control and acceptable acute gastrointestinal toxicity. Bowel cavity is the most sensitive predictor for grade 3 versus grade 0-2 diarrhoea, with any volume receiving 5-50 Gy discriminatory. (C) 2018 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:634 / 641
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy for Anal Cancer Outcomes and Toxicity
    Mitchell, Melissa P.
    Abboud, Mirna
    Eng, Cathy
    Beddar, A. Sam
    Krishnan, Sunil
    Delclos, Marc E.
    Crane, Christopher H.
    Das, Prajnan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2014, 37 (05): : 461 - 466
  • [22] Intensity modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: rigid compliance to dose-volume constraints as a warranty of acceptable toxicity?
    Michael J Chen
    Eduardo Weltman
    Rodrigo M Hanriot
    Fábio P Luz
    Paulo J Cecílio
    José C da Cruz
    Frederico R Moreira
    Adriana S Santos
    Lidiane C Martins
    Wladmir Nadalin
    Radiation Oncology, 2
  • [23] Intensity modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: rigid compliance to dose-volume constraints as a warranty of acceptable toxicity?
    Chen, Michael J.
    Weltman, Eduardo
    Hanriot, Rodrigo M.
    Luz, Fabio P.
    Cecilio, Paulo J.
    da Cruz, Jose C.
    Moreira, Frederico R.
    Santos, Adriana S.
    Martins, Lidiane C.
    Nadalin, Wladmir
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2007, 2 (1)
  • [24] Association of bowel radiation dose-volume with skeletal muscle loss during pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy in cervical cancer
    Lee, Jie
    Lin, Jhen-Bin
    Wu, Meng-Hao
    Chang, Chih-Long
    Jan, Ya-Ting
    Sun, Fang-Ju
    Chen, Yu-Jen
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (09) : 5497 - 5505
  • [25] Association of bowel radiation dose-volume with skeletal muscle loss during pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy in cervical cancer
    Jie Lee
    Jhen-Bin Lin
    Meng-Hao Wu
    Chih-Long Chang
    Ya-Ting Jan
    Fang-Ju Sun
    Yu-Jen Chen
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021, 29 : 5497 - 5505
  • [26] Acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity in women with gynecologic malignancies treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Andrad, RS
    Voynov, G
    Lalonde, R
    Lin, CJ
    Kalnicki, S
    Gerszten, K
    Heron, DE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (01): : S558 - S559
  • [27] Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) - Acute Toxicity Profile and Preliminary Clinical Outcomes
    Arunsingh, M.
    Prasath, S. Sriram
    Arun, B.
    Shrimali, R. K.
    Chatterjee, S.
    Achari, R.
    Mallick, I.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 29 (03) : E78 - E79
  • [28] Dose-volume specification: New challenges with intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Purdy, JA
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2002, 12 (03) : 199 - 209
  • [29] Treatment outcomes and dose-volume histogram analysis of simultaneous integrated boost method for malignant gliomas using intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Nakamatsu, Kiyoshi
    Suzuki, Minoru
    Nishimura, Yasumasa
    Kanamori, Shuichi
    Koike, Ryuta
    Shibata, Toru
    Shintani, Naoya
    Okumura, Masahiko
    Okajima, Kaoru
    Akai, Fumiharu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 13 (01) : 48 - 53
  • [30] Treatment outcomes and dose-volume histogram analysis of simultaneous integrated boost method for malignant gliomas using intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Kiyoshi Nakamatsu
    Minoru Suzuki
    Yasumasa Nishimura
    Shuichi Kanamori
    Ryuta Koike
    Toru Shibata
    Naoya Shintani
    Masahiko Okumura
    Kaoru Okajima
    Fumiharu Akai
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008, 13 : 48 - 53