A randomized outpatient trial of a decision-support information technology tool

被引:47
|
作者
Apkon, M
Mattera, JA
Lin, ZQ
Herrin, J
Bradley, EH
Carbone, M
Holmboe, ES
Gross, CP
Selter, JG
Rich, A
Krumholz, HM
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Yale New Haven Hlth, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Sect Cardiovasc Med, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Sect Hlth Policy & Adm, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[5] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Robert Wood Johnson Clin Scholars Program, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[6] Amer Board Internal Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.165.20.2388
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Decision-support information technology is often adopted to improve clinical decision making, but it is rarely rigorously evaluated. Congress mandated the evaluation of Problem-Knowledge Couplers (PKC Corp, Burlington, Vt), a decision-support tool. proposed for the Department of Defense's new health information network. Methods: This was a patient-level randomized trial conducted at 2 military practices. A total of 936 patients were allocated to the intervention group and 966 to usual care. Couplers were applied before routine ambulatory clinic visits. The primary outcome was quality of care, which was assessed based on the total percentage of any of 24 health care quality process measures (opportunities to provide evidence-based care) that were fulfilled. Secondary outcomes included medical resources consumed within 60 days of enrollment and patient and provider satisfaction. Results: There were 4639 health care opportunities (2374 in the Coupler group and 2265 in the usual-care group), with no difference in the proportion of opportunities fulfilled (33.9% vs 30.7%; P = .12). Although there was a modest improvement in performance on screening/preventive measures, it was offset by poorer performance on some measures of acute care. Coupler patients used more laboratory and pharmacy resources than usual-care patients (logarithmic mean difference, $71). No difference in patient satisfaction was observed between groups, and provider satisfaction was mixed. Conclusion: This study provides no strong evidence to support the utility of this decision-support tool, but it demonstrates the value of rigorous evaluation of decision-support information technology.
引用
收藏
页码:2388 / 2394
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Students views of an online ethical decision-support tool
    Allinson, Maria Donna
    Black, Patricia
    [J]. CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2018, 10 (02) : 226 - 230
  • [32] Impact of a decision-support tool on decision making at the district level in Kenya
    Nutley, Tara
    McNabb, Sarah
    Salentine, Shannon
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2013, 11
  • [33] Impact of a decision-support tool on decision making at the district level in Kenya
    Tara Nutley
    Sarah McNabb
    Shannon Salentine
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 11
  • [34] Online Decision-Support Tool "TECHoice" for the Equipment Technology Choice in Sterile Filling Processes of Biopharmaceuticals
    Shirahata, Haruku
    Badr, Sara
    Shinno, Yuki
    Hagimori, Shuta
    Sugiyama, Hirokazu
    [J]. PROCESSES, 2019, 7 (07) : 1 - 19
  • [35] Virtual obesity collaborative with and without decision-support technology
    Gance-Cleveland, Bonnie
    Aldrich, Heather
    Schmiege, Sarah
    Tyler, Karen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2016, 28 (03) : 316 - 323
  • [36] A decision-support system for analyzing tractor guidance technology
    Lindsay, Karen
    Popp, Michael
    Ashworth, Amanda
    Owens, Phillip
    Burek, Jasmina
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2018, 153 : 115 - 125
  • [37] SUPPORTING DECISION-SUPPORT - WHERE INFORMATION ON DSS IS LOCATED
    ABRAHAM, T
    WANKEL, C
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 1995, 14 (04) : 299 - 312
  • [38] Determining information for inclusion in a decision-support intervention for clinical trial participation: A modified Delphi approach
    Gillies, Katie
    Skea, Zoe C.
    MacLennan, Sara J.
    Ramsay, Craig R.
    Campbell, Marion K.
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2013, 10 (06) : 967 - 976
  • [39] DEVELOPMENT OF A CLINICAL DECISION-SUPPORT TOOL FOR CLASSIFICATION OF RENAL MASSES
    Kunapuli, Gautam
    Ganapathy, Priya
    Varghese, Bino
    Hwang, Darryl
    Cen, Steven
    Desai, Bhushan
    Aron, Manju
    Gill, Inderbir
    Duddalwar, Vinay
    Desai, Mihir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E844 - E845
  • [40] A decision-support tool for post-disaster debris operations
    Lorca, Alvaro
    Celik, Melih
    Ergun, Oezlem
    Keskinocak, Pinar
    [J]. HUMANITARIAN TECHNOLOGY: SCIENCE, SYSTEMS AND GLOBAL IMPACT 2015, HUMTECH2015, 2015, 107 : 154 - 167