Advanced uterovaginal prolapse: is vaginal hysterectomy with McCall culdoplasty as effective as in lesser degrees of prolapse?

被引:11
|
作者
Alas, Alexandriah [1 ]
Chandrasekaran, Neeraja [2 ]
Devakumar, Hemikaa [2 ]
Martin, Laura [2 ]
Hurtado, Eric [2 ]
Davila, G. Willy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Urogynecol, 7300 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Florida, Dept Gynecol, Div Female Pelv Med & Reconstruct Surg, 2950 Cleveland Clin Blvd, Weston, FL 33331 USA
关键词
Uterine prolapse; Advanced prolapse; Total vaginal hysterectomy; Pelvic organ prolapse; McCall culdoplasty; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; SACROSPINOUS LIGAMENT FIXATION; VAULT PROLAPSE; SUSPENSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-017-3436-y
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
There is a paucity of data on the success of vaginal surgery for severe prolapse. The authors hypothesized that the success rates of total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH) with McCall culdoplasty in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and in women with less severe POP are similar. This was a retrospective review of women undergoing TVH with McCall culdoplasty from 2005 to 2014. Advanced POP was defined as exteriorized uterovaginal prolapse with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) point C, Ba or Bp 50% of the total vaginal length. The primary aim was to compare surgical success of TVH with McCall culdoplasty for the repair of advanced POP and less severe POP at 1 year. A total of 311 women were included, 38 with advanced POP and 273 with less severe POP. Women with advanced POP were older (71.6 vs. 61.8 years, respectively; p < 0.0001), but there were no significant differences in the length of follow-up (102.5 vs. 117 weeks, p = 0.2378), success rates (76.3% vs. 68.5%, p = 0.3553) or reoperation rates (2.6% vs. 4%, p > 0.9999) between women with advanced POP and less severe POP, respectively. There was a higher failure rate in the anterior compartment in those with advanced POP (18.4% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.0168), but not in the apical or posterior compartment. TVH with McCall culdoplasty is equally effective for the treatment of advanced uterovaginal prolapse as for the treatment of less severe POP. Surgeons should consider this traditional surgery for their patients even if they have high-stage uterovaginal prolapse.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 144
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Total Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Compared With Supracervical Hysterectomy With Sacrocervicopexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse
    Giugale, Lauren E.
    Melnyk, Alexandra, I
    Ruppert, Kristine M.
    Napoe, Gnankang S.
    Lavelle, Erin S.
    Bradley, Megan S.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2022, 77 (03) : 151 - 152
  • [22] The accuracy of comparing laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse
    Alay, Ismail
    Kaya, Cihan
    Cengiz, Huseyin
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 29 (06) : 923 - 923
  • [23] Total Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Compared With Supracervical Hysterectomy With Sacrocervicopexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse
    Giugale, Lauren E.
    Melnyk, Alexandra I.
    Ruppert, Kristine M.
    Napoe, Gnankang S.
    Lavelle, Erin S.
    Bradley, Megan S.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 138 (03): : 435 - 442
  • [24] Abdominal hysterectomy and Burch colposuspension for uterovaginal prolapse
    H. S. Cronjé
    J. A. A. de Beer
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2004, 15 : 257 - 260
  • [25] Abdominal hysterectomy and Burch colposuspension for uterovaginal prolapse
    Cronjé, HS
    de Beer, JAA
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2004, 15 (04) : 257 - 260
  • [26] Apical support at the time of hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse
    Kelly L. Kantartzis
    Lindsay C. Turner
    Jonathan P. Shepherd
    Li Wang
    Daniel G. Winger
    Jerry L. Lowder
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2015, 26 : 207 - 212
  • [27] Apical support at the time of hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse
    Kantartzis, Kelly L.
    Turner, Lindsay C.
    Shepherd, Jonathan P.
    Wang, Li
    Winger, Daniel G.
    Lowder, Jerry L.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 (02) : 207 - 212
  • [28] High Uterosacral Ligament Fixation Versus McCall's Culdoplasty for Vaginal Vault Suspension in Utero-Vaginal Prolapse Surgery
    Verma, Aruna
    Kashyap, Monika
    Gupta, Abhilasha
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [29] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse
    Aparna Diwan
    Charles R. Rardin
    William C. Strohsnitter
    Alexandra Weld
    Peter Rosenblatt
    Neeraj Kohli
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2006, 17 : 79 - 83
  • [30] Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse
    Ridgeway, Beri M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (06) : 802 - 809