Laparoscopic In Situ Dismembered Pyeloplasty Can Facilitate Laparoscopic Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair: A Prospective Cohort Trial

被引:5
|
作者
Aminsharifi, Alireza [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Molaie, Afshin [1 ]
Monsef, Alireza [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Dept Urol, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Laparoscopy Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Urol Surg, Erwin St, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty; modifications; ureteropelvic junction obstruction; laparoscopy;
D O I
10.1089/end.2017.0538
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe the technique of laparoscopic in situ dismembered pyeloplasty as a modified technique during which the alignment of ureter and renal pelvis remains intact during ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) anastomosis. We also assessed intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of this modification in comparison to standard laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Patients and Methods: Patients with significant primary UPJ obstruction without any history of abdominal surgery, high ureter insertion, or renal anomalies were considered. The patients were consecutively enrolled one after another into one of two study groups: classic laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty (Group I) or laparoscopic in situ dismembered pyeloplasty (Group II), however, those with aberrant vessels crossing the UPJ were allocated specifically to Group I because UPJ anastomosis should be done anterior to the aberrant vessels. Demographic data, intraoperative timings, and postoperative and follow-up outcomes were compared in the two groups. Results: Patients in Group I (n=23) and Group II (n=14) had similar demographic characteristics. Mean operative time was significantly longer in Group I (103.819.95 minutes vs 89.5 +/- 18.90 minutes, p=0.038). Total duration of UPJ repair and anastomosis was also significantly longer in Group I (92.7 +/- 15.82 minutes vs 78.4 +/- 14.76 minutes, p=0.021). The method of pyeloplasty significantly affected the time required to prepare ureter and renal pelvis (p=0.017) and the duration of UPJ anastomosis (p=0.014). Both were shorter in Group II. Mean follow-up period was 14.4 +/- 7.42 months in Group I and 14.05 +/- 7.93 months in Group II (p=0.88). Success rate was 95.6% in Group I and 100% in Group II (p=0.42). Conclusion: Laparoscopic in situ pyeloplasty is a safe and effective approach that can help simplify laparoscopic pyeloplasty, especially at teaching centers where surgeons with variable levels of experience perform laparoscopic procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 222
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Experience with 142 Cases in a High-Volume Center
    Singh, Onkar
    Gupta, Shilpi Singh
    Hastir, Ankur
    Arvind, Nand Kishore
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (09) : 1431 - 1434
  • [32] Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Following Open Pyeloplasty in Children
    Powell, Christopher
    Gatti, John M.
    Juang, David
    Murphy, J. Patrick
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 25 (10): : 858 - 863
  • [33] Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: A Multi-institutional Experience
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    Leveillee, Raymond J.
    Patel, Manoj B.
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Bracho, Jorge E., II
    Moore, Charles R.
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Schatloff, Oscar
    Bird, Vincent G.
    Munver, Ravi
    Patel, Vipul R.
    UROLOGY, 2012, 79 (02) : 351 - 355
  • [34] Creation of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and its correction by chemical glue-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty
    Chiu, AW
    Lin, CH
    Huan, SK
    Liu, CJ
    Lin, CC
    Huang, YL
    Lin, WL
    Huang, SH
    Lee, PS
    Lin, CN
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2003, 17 (01) : 23 - 28
  • [35] A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Complains Open Pyeloplasty and Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction (UPJO): Subjective Outcome
    Srinivas, K. K.
    Uppin, I., V
    Nerle, R. B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2011, 5 (08) : 1601 - 1605
  • [36] MANAGEMENT OF TRANSPLANT URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION BY DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY
    WALTZER, WC
    GONDA, A
    LEHR, H
    JAO, S
    ANAISE, D
    FRISCHER, Z
    RAPAPORT, FT
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1985, 17 (05) : 2149 - 2151
  • [38] Early experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children
    Sweeney, DD
    Kim, C
    Docimo, SG
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 185 - 185
  • [39] TRANSPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY FOR URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION IN OUR CENTER
    Maghsoudi, Robab
    Shadpour, Pejman
    Etemadian, Masoud
    Samadi, Javid
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A287 - A287
  • [40] LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSMESENTERIC PYELOPLASTY IN PATIENTS WITH LEFT URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION
    Guliev, Bakhman G.
    Komyakov, Boris K.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A286 - A286