Systemic perspectives on scaling agricultural innovations. A review

被引:200
|
作者
Wigboldus, Seerp [1 ,2 ]
Klerkx, Laurens [2 ]
Leeuwis, Cees [2 ]
Schut, Marc [2 ,3 ]
Muilerman, Sander [2 ,4 ]
Jochemsen, Henk [5 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen UR Univ & Res Ctr, Ctr Dev Innovat, POB 88, NL-6700 AB Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, Knowledge Technol & Innovat Grp, POB 8130, NL-6700 EW Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Int Inst Trop Agr, Rohero 1,Ave 18 Septembre 10, Bujumbura, Burundi
[4] Int Inst Trop Agr, Airport Residential Area, CSIR Campus,POB M32, Accra, Ghana
[5] Wageningen Univ, Philosophy Grp, POB 8130, NL-6700 EW Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Systemic analysis; Innovation systems; Diffusion of innovations; Adoption of innovations; Technology transfer; Responsible innovation; Sustainability transitions; Upscaling; Outscaling; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; PATH DEPENDENCE; SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FOOD SECURITY; TRANSITIONS; FRAMEWORK; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1007/s13593-016-0380-z
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Agricultural production involves the scaling of agricultural innovations such as disease-resistant and drought-tolerant maize varieties, zero-tillage techniques, permaculture cultivation practices based on perennial crops and automated milking systems. Scaling agricultural innovations should take into account complex interactions between biophysical, social, economic and institutional factors. Actual methods of scaling are rather empirical and based on the premise of 'find out what works in one place and do more of the same, in another place'. These methods thus do not sufficiently take into account complex realities beyond the concepts of innovation transfer, dissemination, diffusion and adoption. As a consequence, scaling initiatives often do not produce the desired effect. They may produce undesirable effects in the form of negative spill-overs or unanticipated side effects such as environmental degradation, bad labour conditions of farm workers and loss of control of farming communities over access to genetic resources. Therefore, here, we conceptualise scaling processes as an integral part of a systemic approach to innovation, to anticipate on the possible consequences of scaling efforts. We propose a method that connects the heuristic framework of the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions (MLP) to a philosophical 'modal aspects' framework, with the objective of elucidating the connectedness between technologies, processes and practices. The resultant framework, the PRactice-Oriented Multi-level perspective on Innovation and Scaling (PROMIS), can inform research and policymakers on the complex dynamics involved in scaling. This is illustrated in relation to three cases in which the framework was applied: scaling agro-ecological practices in Nicaragua, farmer field schools on cocoa cultivation in Cameroon and 'green rubber' cultivation in Southwest China.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Overcoming constraints of scaling: Critical and empirical perspectives on agricultural innovation scaling
    Gebreyes, Million
    Mekonnen, Kindu
    Thorne, Peter
    Derseh, Melkamu
    Adie, Aberra
    Mulema, Annet
    Ahmed Kemal, Seid
    Tamene, Lulseged
    Amede, Tilahun
    Haileslassie, Amare
    Gebrekirstos, Aster
    Mupangwa, Walter Tamuka
    Ebrahim, Mohammed
    Alene, Temesgen
    Asfaw, Addisu
    Dubale, Workneh
    Yasabu, Simret
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (05):
  • [32] Agroecological innovations. Increasing food production with participatory development
    Dessein, J
    EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 30 (03) : 412 - 414
  • [33] Youth violence: Current research and recent practice innovations.
    Curry, GD
    SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 2000, 74 (04) : 679 - 681
  • [34] INNOVATIVE PROFILE AND FOCUS ON INNOVATIONS. CASE STUDY SLOVAKIA
    Jezkova, Renata
    16TH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON REGIONAL SCIENCES, 2013, : 205 - 211
  • [35] The Effectiveness of Public Subsidies for Private Innovations. An Experimental Approach
    Brueggemann, Julia
    Proeger, Till
    B E JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & POLICY, 2017, 17 (04):
  • [36] Patents, citations and innovations. A window on the knowledge economy.
    Maurseth, PB
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS, 2003, 13 (02) : 207 - 211
  • [37] ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF BANKS OF MODELS IN THE PROGRAMMING OF LIFE CYCLES OF INNOVATIONS.
    Zhuk, K.D.
    Electronic modeling, 1981, (05): : 799 - 813
  • [38] DGIMTalk on digital innovations. In the hurdles to electronic patient records
    不详
    INNERE MEDIZIN, 2023, 64 (09): : 885 - 885
  • [39] Developing global business leaders: Policies, processes, and innovations.
    Fleenor, JW
    PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 55 (03) : 727 - 730
  • [40] Scaling up research-for-development innovations in food and agricultural systems
    Shilomboleni, Helena
    De Plaen, Renaud
    DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE, 2019, 29 (06) : 723 - 734