Use of a preference-based measure of health (EQ-5D) in COPD and asthma

被引:109
|
作者
Pickard, A. Simon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wilke, Caitlyn [1 ,2 ]
Jung, Eunmi [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Sneh [1 ,2 ]
Stavem, Knut [4 ]
Lee, Todd A. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice, Ctr Pharmacoecon Res, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Adm, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Edward Hines Jr VA Hosp, Ctr Management Complex Chron Dis, Hines, IL 60141 USA
[4] Akershus Univ Hosp, Dept Med, NO-1478 Lorenskog, Norway
[5] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
asthma; COPD; health outcomes; quality of life; EQ-5D;
D O I
10.1016/j.rmed.2007.11.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: EQ-5D is a generic preference-based measure of health that can help to understand the impact of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The purpose of this paper was to synthesize literature on the validity and reliability of EQ-5D use in studies of asthma and COPD, and estimate EQ-5D utility scores associated with stage of disease. Methods: A structured search was conducted in EMBASE and MEDLINE (1988-2007) using keywords relevant to respiratory disease and EQ-5D. Original research studies in asthma or COPD that reported EQ-5D results and/or psychometric properties were included. Results: Studies that reported psychometric properties supported the construct validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness of EQ-5D in asthma (seven studies) and COPD (nine studies), although some evidence of ceiling effects were observed in asthma studies. In asthma studies that reported summary scores (n = 11), EQ-5D index-based scores ranged from 0.42 (SD 0.30) to 0.93 (SD not reported). In COPD studies (n = 8), scores ranged from 0.52 (SD 0.16) to 0.84 (SD 0.15). While few asthma studies reported scores by severity level, sufficient studies in COPD were available to calculate pooled mean utility scores according to GOLD stage: stage I = 0.74 (0.62-0.87), stage II = 0.74 (0.66-0.83), stage III = 0.69 (0.60-0.78) and stage IV = 0.61 (0.44-0.77) (most severe).
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 536
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Developing a preference-based measure for postmenopausal health
    Brazier, JE
    Zoellner, YF
    Platts, M
    Towers, I
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (06) : 606 - 606
  • [32] PREDICTING HEALTH CARE COSTS IN ASTHMA USING THE EQ-5D INDEX SCORE
    Gu, N. Y.
    Raisch, D. W.
    Wu, J.
    Gai, Y.
    Hay, J. W.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A370 - A371
  • [33] Does the EQ-5D Measure Quality of Life in Schizophrenia?
    Hastrup, Lene Halling
    Nordentoft, Merete
    Hjorthoj, Carsten
    Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2011, 14 (04): : 187 - 196
  • [34] Is the EQ-5D fit for purpose in mental health?
    Brazier, John
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 197 (05) : 348 - 349
  • [35] Argentine Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States
    Ariel Augustovski, Federico
    Edit Irazola, Vilma
    Pascual Velazquez, Alberto
    Gibbons, Luz
    Craig, Benjamin M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (04) : 587 - 596
  • [36] Comparing UK, USA and Australian values for EQ-5D as a health utility measure of oral health
    Brennan, D. S.
    Teusner, D. N.
    [J]. COMMUNITY DENTAL HEALTH, 2015, 32 (03) : 180 - 184
  • [37] Summarizing population health using EQ-5D
    Chuang, L. H.
    Kind, P.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (06) : A205 - A205
  • [38] CHILEAN VALUATION OF THE EQ-5D HEALTH STATES
    Zarate, V
    Kind, P.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A98 - A98
  • [39] Is the EQ-5D responsive to recovery from a moderate COPD exacerbation?
    Goossens, Lucas M. A.
    Nivens, Michael C.
    Sachs, Paul
    Monz, Brigitta U.
    Rutten-van Molken, Maureen P. M. H.
    [J]. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2011, 105 (08) : 1195 - 1202
  • [40] IS THE EQ-5D RESPONSIVE TO RECOVERY FROM A MODERATE COPD EXACERBATION?
    Goossens, L.
    Rutten-van Moelken, M. P.
    Nivens, C.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A453 - A453